Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Anne Jeffrey


In this paper I defend a form of epistocracy I call limited epistocracy – rule by institutions housing expertise in non-political areas that become politically relevant. This kind of limited epistocracy, I argue, isn't a far-off fiction. With increasing frequency, governments are outsourcing political power to expert institutions to solve urgent, multidimensional problems because they outperform ordinary democratic decision-making. I consider the objection that limited epistocracy, while more effective than its competitors, lacks a fundamental intrinsic value that its competitors have; namely, political inclusion. After explaining this challenge, I suggest that limited epistocracies can be made compatible with robust political inclusion if specialized institutions are confined to issuing directives that give citizens multiple actionable options. I explain how this safeguards citizens’ inclusion through rational deliberation, choice, and contestation.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Ancell, A. 2016. ‘Democracy Isn't That Smart (But We Can Make It Smarter): On Landemore's Democratic Reason.’ Episteme.
Anderson, E. 2011. ‘Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.’ Episteme, 8: 144–64.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2000. Intention, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Beckman, L. 2008. ‘Democratic Inclusion, Law, and CausesRatio Juris, 21: 348–64.
Brennan, J. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Broome, J. 2007. ‘Wide or Narrow Scope?Mind, 116: 359–70.
Chappell, Z. 2012. Deliberative Democracy: A Critical Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Christiano, T. 2006. ‘Democracy.’ In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Estlund, D. M. 2009. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
European Parliament. 2016. ‘REACH Regulation 2016.’ Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals, 2006.
Kukla, R., Huebner, B. and Winsberg, E. 2014. ‘Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 46: 1623.
Landemore, H. 2012. ‘Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and Why It Matters.’ Journal of Public Deliberation, 8: 114.
Manguvo, A. and Mafuvadze, B. 2015. ‘The Impact of Traditional Religious Practices on the Spread of Ebola in West Africa: Time for a Strategic Shift.’ Pan African Medical Journal, 22. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2015.22.1.6190.
Mulligan, T. 2015. ‘On the Compatibility of Epistocracy and Public Reason.’ Social Theory and Practice, 41: 458–76.
Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism. Oxford Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. 2012. ‘Legitimacy and Justice in Republican Perspective.’ Current Legal Problems, 65: 5982.
Pillai, S. K., Nyenswah, T., Rouse, E., Arwady, M. A., Forrester, J. D., Hunter, J. C., Matanock, A., Ayscue, P., Monroe, B., Schafer, I. J., Poblano, L., Neatherlin, J., Montgomery, J. M. and De Cock, K. M. 2014. ‘Developing an Incident Management System to Support Ebola Response – Liberia, July–August 2014.’ CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly, 63: 930–3.
Rehg, W. 2011. ‘Evaluating Complex Collaborative Expertise: The Case of Climate Change.’ Argumentation, 25: 385400.
Richardson, H. S. 2002. Democratic Autonomy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, H. S. 2012. ‘Relying on Experts as We Reason Together.’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22: 100–1.
Shields, J. A. and Dunn, J. M. Sr. 2016. Passing on the Right: Conservative Professors in the Progressive University. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Trout, J. D. 2013. ‘Democracy and Scientific Expertise: Illusions of Political and Epistemic Inclusion.’ Synthese, 190: 1267–91. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0226-4.
Young, I. M. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, L. T. 2012. Epistemic Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


  • Anne Jeffrey


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed