Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-7wlv9 Total loading time: 0.307 Render date: 2022-05-24T15:55:26.741Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

The Condemnation-Absolution Syndrome: Issues of Validity and Generality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

Abstract

In their article “Just War and Unjust Soldiers: American Public Opinion on the Moral Equality of Combatants,” Scott Sagan and Benjamin Valentino argue that the American public evaluates soldiers’ wartime actions more according to whether the war they are fighting was initiated justly, than on their actions during warfare. In this respect, their views are more similar to those of revisionist philosophers than to those of traditional just war theorists. Before leaping to broad conclusions from their survey, it should be replicated. If the findings hold in the replication, intriguing questions could be asked about comparative cross-national attitudes and about the relationship between democracy and war.

Type
Symposium: Just War and Unjust Soldiers
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Professor Nannerl O. Keohane for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

1 This essay is a response to Scott D. Sagan and Benjamin A. Valentino, “Just War and Unjust Soldiers: American Public Opinion on the Moral Equality of Combatants,” Ethics & International Affairs 33, no. 4, pp. 411–444. All quotes and pages numbers refer to that article unless otherwise noted.

2 King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See the Open Science Collaboration website at osf.io/vmrgu/.

4 William Shakespeare (Henry V, act IV, scene 1), quoted in Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977), p. 39Google Scholar.

5 Hughes, Brent L., Camp, Nicholas P., Gomez, Jesse, Natu, Vaidehi S., Grill-Spector, Kalanit, and Eberhart, Jennifer L., “Neural Adaptation to Faces Reveals Racial Outgroup Homogeneity Effects in Early Perception,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 29 (July 16, 2019), pp. 14532–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. For example, a recent study suggests that the greater ability of white subjects to distinguish the faces of other Caucasians than to differentiate black faces is deeply embedded in human neurological attributes.

6 Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, and Camerer, Colin, “‘Economic man’ in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, no. 6 (December 2005), pp. 795815CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Condemnation-Absolution Syndrome: Issues of Validity and Generality
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Condemnation-Absolution Syndrome: Issues of Validity and Generality
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Condemnation-Absolution Syndrome: Issues of Validity and Generality
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *