Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-7wlv9 Total loading time: 0.224 Render date: 2022-05-24T16:20:01.133Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Extremism and Confusion in American Views about the Ethics of War: A Comment on Sagan and Valentino

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

Abstract

In their article “Just War and Unjust Soldiers: American Public Opinion on the Moral Equality of Combatants,” Scott Sagan and Benjamin Valentino have revealed a wealth of information about the views of contemporary Americans on the ethics of war. Virtually all they have discovered is surprising and much of it is alarming. My commentary in this symposium seeks mainly to extract a bit more from their data and to draw a few further inferences. Among the striking features of Sagan and Valentino's data are that the views of Americans tend to cluster at the extreme ends of the spectrum of possible views about the ethics of war, that an apparent sympathy for pacifism coexists with harshly punitive views about the treatment of soldiers, and that few of those surveyed appear to have given any thought to the implications of the views they expressed for what it might be permissible for enemies of the United States to do to captured American soldiers. The commentary concludes by arguing that Sagan and Valentino's findings do not, as they argue, support the fear that is sometimes expressed that a wider acceptance of revisionist just war theory, and in particular its incorporation into the law, would make the practice of war even more barbarous than it already is.

Type
Symposium: Just War and Unjust Soldiers
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In this essay, I respond to Scott D. Sagan and Benjamin A. Valentino's article, “Just War and Unjust Soldiers: American Public Opinion on the Moral Equality of Combatants,” Ethics & International Affairs 33, no. 4, pp. 411–444. All quotations, figures, and pages numbers referring to the authors or their work are from this article.

2 Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Boston: Beacon, 1962), book 4, p. 420Google Scholar.

3 This notion includes “retribution . . . directed at outgroup members who, themselves, were not the direct causal agents in the original attack against the person's ingroup.” Lickel, Brian, Miller, Norman, Stenstrom, Douglas M., and Denson, Thomas F., “Vicarious Retribution: The Role of Collective Blame in Intergroup Aggression,” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, no. 4 (November 2006), p. 372CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1907), p. 490Google Scholar.

5 For a proposal for a juridical body similar to that mentioned by the authors, see McMahan, Jeff, “The Prevention of Unjust Wars,” in Benbaji, Yitzhak and Sussman, Naomi, eds., Reading Walzer (London: Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar.

1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Extremism and Confusion in American Views about the Ethics of War: A Comment on Sagan and Valentino
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Extremism and Confusion in American Views about the Ethics of War: A Comment on Sagan and Valentino
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Extremism and Confusion in American Views about the Ethics of War: A Comment on Sagan and Valentino
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *