1 The language of peace, prosperity, and justice comes directly from United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/55/2. For the international commitment to poverty eradication, see United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/51/178; United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/59/247; Copenhagen Declaration and Programme of Action adopted at the World Summit for Social Development in 1995; available at http:\\www.un.org/esa/socdev/wssd/agreements/decpartc.htm; Monterrey Consensus of the International Committee on Financing for Development of 2002; statements of the United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development of 2002; and the Chairman's Summary of the Gleneagles Summit of G-8 Ministers of 2005; available at http:\\www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page7883.asp.
3 John Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 37.
6 John Rawls, Political Liberalism, paperback ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 291–94.
7 Rawls, The Law of Peoples, p. 65.
21 Ibid., pp. 5, 37, 106.
26 Allen Buchanan, “Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World,” Ethics 110 (July 2000), pp. 697–721.
27 Unlike ideal theory, which assumes full compliance and favorable conditions, nonideal theory is the part of Rawls's theory of justice that deals specifically with noncompliance and unfavorable conditions.
28 Rawls, The Law of Peoples, p. 109.
34 John Rawls, A Theory of Justice(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 115.
36 Ibid., pp. 109, 114, 355.
37 The distinction between positive and negative duties is not very important for Rawls, especially since it can easily get blurred. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 114.
38 Rawls, A Theory of Justice, pp. 339–40.
54 Independent Commission on International Development Issues, North-South: A Programme for Survival (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1980), pp. 49–50.
56 Rawls, The Law of Peoples, pp. 111, 116, 113–19.
57 United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today's Diverse World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 259.
58 HPI-1 assesses data from the developing world, while HPI-2 analyzes data from countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
59 Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1999), p. 21.
61 Rawls, The Law of Peoples, pp. 94–97.
63 United Nations Millennium Project, Investing in Development.
65 World Bank, World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997); and World Bank, World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000/2001).
66 United Nations Millennium Project, Investing in Development, p. 204.
67 Rawls, A Theory of Justice, pp. 8, 244–45, 575. For legal sanctions, see Rawls, A Theory of Justice, pp. 240, 249, 575–76.
* My thanks go to Christian Barry, Charles Beitz, Ronnie Beiner, Joe Carens, Michaele Ferguson, Stanley Hoffmann, Catherine Lu, Carla Norrlöf, Thomas Pogge, Zornitsa Stoyanova-Yerburgh, David Welch, and Iris Young for their feedback. I also benefited from comments received at the Conference on Dilemmas of Global Justice at the University of Toronto in April 2003, the Seminar on Ethics and International Affairs at Harvard University in April 2003, the School of Social Science Seminar of the Institute for Advanced Study in October 2003, the Cosmopolitanism Panel of the International Studies Association Annual Meeting in Montreal in March 2004, and the Philosophy Department Colloquium at Southern Connecticut State University in May 2004.