Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine

  • R. Reisli (a1), J. Celik (a1), S. Tuncer (a1), A. Yosunkaya (a1) and S. Otelcioglu (a1)...
Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: To compare, using prilocaine, the effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) and continuous epidural anaesthesia (CEA) on haemodynamic stability as well as the quality of anaesthesia and recovery in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate gland.

Methods: Thirty patients (>60 yr) were randomized into two groups. Prilocaine, 2% 40 mg, was given to patients in the CSA group, and prilocaine 1% 150 mg was given to patients in the CEA group. Incremental doses were given if the level of sensory block was lower than T10 or if needed during surgery.

Results: There was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure in Group CEA compared with Group CSA (P < 0.01). The decrease in heart rate in Group CSA occurred 10 min after the first local anaesthetic administration and continued through the operation (P < 0.05). The level of sensory anaesthesia was similar in both groups. The times to reach the level of T10 and the upper level of sensory blockade (Tmax) were 18.0 ± 4.7 and 25.3 ± 7.0 min in Groups CSA and CEA, respectively, and were significantly longer in Group CEA. The duration of anaesthesia was 76.8 ± 4 min and was shorter in Group CSA (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Spinal or epidural anaesthesia administered continuously was reliable in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Continuous spinal anaesthesia had a more rapid onset of action, produced more effective sensory and motor blockade and had a shorter recovery period. Prilocaine appeared to be a safe local anaesthetic for use with either continuous spinal anaesthesia or continuous epidural anaesthesia.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Ruhiye Reisli, Selcuk Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dali, 42080 Konya, Turkey. E-mail: ireisli@hotmail.com; Tel: +90 332 3232600/1159/1864; Fax: +90 332 3232643
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

HoleA, TerjesenT, BreivigH. Epidural versus general anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1980; 24: 279287.

SchniderTW, Mueller-DuysingS, JohrM, GerberH. Incremental dosing versus single-dose spinal anesthesia and hemodynamic stability.Anesth Analg1993; 77: 11741178.

Favarel-GarriguesJF, SztarkF, PetitjeanME, ThicoipeM, LassieP, DabadieP. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter.Anesth Analg1996; 82: 312316.

KlimschaW, WeinstablC, IliasW, et al. Continuous spinal anesthesia with a microcatheter and low-dose bupivacaine decreases the hemodynamic effects of centroneuraxis blocks in elderly patients.Anesth Analg1993; 77: 275280.

SutterPA, GamulinZ, ForsterA. Comparison of continuous spinal and continuous epidural anaesthesia for lower limb surgery in elderly patients. A retrospective study.Anaesthesia1989; 44: 4750.

CollardCD, EappenS, LynchEP, ConcepcionM. Continuous spinal anesthesia with invasive hemodynamic monitoring for surgical repair of the hip in two patients with severe aortic stenosis.Anesth Analg1995; 81: 195198.

GraceD, OrrDA. Continuous spinal anaesthesia in acute respiratory failure.Anaesthesia1993; 48: 226228.

KestinIG, MaddenAP, MulveinJT, GoodmanNW. Comparison of incremental spinal anaesthesia using a 32-gauge catheter with extradural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.Br J Anaesth1991; 66: 232236.

DennyN, MastersR, PearsonD, et al. Postural puncture headache after continuous spinal anesthesia.Anesth Analg1987; 66: 791794.

StandlT, BeckH. Radiological examination of the intrathecal position of microcatheters in continuous spinal anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth1993; 71: 803806.

StandlT, EckertS, RundshagenI, Schulte am EschJ. A directional needle improves effectiveness and reduces complication of microcatheter continuous spinal anaesthesia.Can J Anaesth1995; 42: 701705.

DennyNM, SelanderDE. Continuous spinal anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth1998; 81: 590597.

HorlockerTT, McGregorDG, MatsushigeDK, et al. Neurologic complications of 603 consecutive continuous spinal anesthesia using macrocatheter and microcatheter techniques. Perioperative outcomes group.Anesth Analg1997; 84: 10631070.

MarkJB, SteeleSM. Cardiovascular effects of spinal anesthesia.Int Anesthesiol Clin1989; 27: 3139.

MalmqvistLA, BengtssonM, BjornssonG, JorfeldtL, LofstromJB. Sympathetic activity and haemodynamic variables during spinal analgesia in man.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1987; 31: 467473.

DefalqueRJ. Compared effects of spinal and epidural anesthesia upon blood pressure.Anesthesiology1962; 23: 627630.

BiglerD, HjortsoNC, EdstromH, ChristensenNJ, KehletH. Comparative effects of intrathecal bupivacaine and tetracaine on analgesia, cardiovascular function and plasma catecholamines.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1986; 30: 199203.

LoganMR, McClureIH, WildsmithAW. Plain bupivacaine: unpredictable spinal agent.Br J Anaesth1986; 58: 292296.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • ISSN: 0265-0215
  • EISSN: 1365-2346
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-anaesthesiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 64 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.