Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Remifentanil versus alfentanil in total intravenous anaesthesia for day case surgery

  • I. Alper (a1), E. Erhan (a1), G. Ugur (a1) and B. Ozyar (a1)


Background and objective: We assessed the intraoperative haemodynamic responses and recovery profiles of total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and alfentanil for outpatient surgery.

Methods: Patients in Group 1 (n = 20) received alfentanil 20 μg kg−1 followed by 2 μg kg−1 min−1 intravenously; patients in Group 2 (n = 20) received remifentanil 1 μg kg−1 followed by 0.5 μg kg−1 min−1 intravenously. Both groups then received propofol 2 mg kg−1 followed by 9 mg kg−1 h−1 intravenously. Five minutes after skin incision, infusion rates were decreased, and at the end of surgery, all infusions were discontinued. Early recovery was assessed by the Aldrete score, whereas intermediate recovery was assessed with the postanaesthetic discharge scoring system (PADS).

Results: Perioperative arterial pressure was similar in both groups; heart rate was lower in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The times to spontaneous and adequate respiration, response to verbal commands, extubation and times for Aldrete score ≥9 were shorter in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Pain scores were higher in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Overall times for postanaesthetic discharge scores ≥9 were similar.

Conclusions: Early recovery of patients after day surgery is significantly shorter after total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil compared with that with alfentanil but postoperative pain management must be planned ahead.

Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Işık Alper, 194 Sokak No:28 Demirler apt. D:23, 35040, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey. E-mail:; Tel: +90 542 4143685; Fax: +90 232 2479783
Hide All
WhitePF. Ambulatory anaesthesia. Advances into the new millennium.Anesth Analg2000; 90: 12341235.

PhilipBK, ScuderiPE, ChungF, et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anaesthesia. The Remifentanil/Alfentanil Outpatient TIVA Group.Anesth Analg1997; 84: 515521.

GlassPSA, GanTJ, HowellS. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil.Anesth Analg1999; 89(Suppl): S714.

AldreteJA. The post anaesthesia recovery score revisited.J Clin Anesth1995; 7: 8991.

ChungF, ChanV, OngD. A post anaesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery.J Clin Anesth1995; 7: 500506.

HogueCW, BowdleTA, O'LearyC, et al. A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery.Anesth Analg1996; 83: 279285.

RowbothamDJ, PeacockJE, JonesRM, et al. Comparison of remifentanil in combination with isoflurane or propofol for short-stay surgical procedures.Br J Anaesth1998; 80: 752755.

DershwitzM, RandelGI, RosowCE, et al. Initial clinical experience with remifentanil, a new opioid metabolized by esterases.Anesth Analg1995; 81: 619623.

StewardDJ, VolgyesiG. Stabilometry: a new tool for measuring recovery following general anaesthesia.Can Anaesth Soc J1978; 25: 46.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • ISSN: 0265-0215
  • EISSN: 1365-2346
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-anaesthesiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Abstract views

Total abstract views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.