Skip to main content
×
Home

The future study of terrorism

  • Richard English (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article reflects on the central problems to be faced over the next fifty years of the academic study of terrorism. It discusses a series of problems that are sometimes raised (regarding definition, the division between Critical Terrorism Studies and Orthodox Terrorism Studies, and the supposed stagnation in contemporary terrorism research), and argues that these present rather limited difficulties, in reality. It then identifies a greater problem, in the form of a five-fold fragmentation of the current field, before offering suggested means of addressing in practice these latter, more profound difficulties.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: Professor Richard English, Room 235, Arts Building, The Scores, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AX, Scotland, United Kingdom. Author’s email: rle2@st-andrews.ac.uk
References
Hide All

1 Arguably the greatest of terrorism scholars, Martha Crenshaw, formally began her graduate student research into terrorism in 1967 (Crenshaw Martha, Explaining Terrorism: Causes, Processes and Consequences (London: Routledge, 2011), p. ix). For consideration of the early years of the academic study of terrorism (focusing mainly on the US), see Stampnitzky Lisa, Disciplining Terror: How Experts Invented ‘Terrorism’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).

2 English Richard, ‘The enduring illusions of terrorism and counter-terrorism’, in Richard English (ed.), Illusions of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).

3 Schmid Alex P. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research (London: Routledge, 2011); Richards Anthony, ‘Conceptualizing terrorism’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 37:3 (2014); Wilkinson Paul and Bryan Dominic, ‘Is terrorism still a useful analytical term or should it be abandoned?’, in Richard Jackson and Samuel J. Sinclair (eds), Contemporary Debates on Terrorism (London: Routledge, 2012); Ramsay Gilbert, ‘Why terrorism can, but should not be defined’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8:2 (2015); Richards Anthony, Conceptualizing Terrorism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).

4 Thereby involving the issues addressed in: Cormac Rory, Confronting the Colonies: British Intelligence and Counterinsurgency (London: Hurst and Company, 2013); Bennett Huw, Fighting the Mau Mau: The British Army and Counter-Insurgency in the Kenya Emergency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).

5 Schmid (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research; Ramsay, ‘Why terrorism can’; Richards, Conceptualizing Terrorism, pp. 9, 12, 18–19.

6 Lodge Juliet (ed.), Terrorism: A Challenge to the State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981), pp. 15; Richardson Louise, What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Terrorist Threat (London: John Murray, 2006), pp. 1939; Wilkinson Paul, Terrorism Versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 421; Guelke Adrian, The Age of Terrorism and the International Political System (London: I. B. Tauris, 1998), pp. 1834.

7 It adheres to the definition that I set out in 2009: ‘Terrorism involves heterogeneous violence used or threatened with a political aim; it can involve a variety of acts, of targets, and of actors; it possesses an important psychological dimension, producing terror or fear among a directly threatened group and also a wider implied audience in the hope of maximizing political communication and achievement; it embodies the exerting and implementing of power, and the attempted redressing of power-relations; it represents a subspecies of warfare, and as such it can form part of a wider campaign of violent and nonviolent attempts at political leverage.’ See English Richard, Terrorism: How to Respond (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 24.

8 See Jackson Richard, Smyth Marie Breen, and Gunning Jeroen (eds), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda (London: Routledge, 2009); Jackson Richard, Jarvis Lee, Gunning Jeroen, and Breen Smyth Marie, Terrorism: A Critical Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011); and also the journal, Critical Studies on Terrorism.

9 Jackson and Sinclair (eds), Contemporary Debates on Terrorism, p. xi; English Richard and Jackson Richard (eds), ‘The Belfast International Terrorism Workshop’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 2:2 (2009).

10 Wilkinson, Terrorism Versus Democracy, p. 17.

11 On this, see Richards, Conceptualizing Terrorism, pp. 33–4, 68.

12 English Richard, Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA (London: Pan, 2012).

13 Sageman Marc, Understanding Terror Networks (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004); Sageman Marc, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).

14 Sageman Marc, ‘The stagnation in terrorism research’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 26:4 (2014), pp. 565, 569, 576.

15 Ibid., p. 565.

16 Ibid., p. 571.

17 Ibid., p. 567.

18 Foster Roy, Vivid Faces: The Revolutionary Generation in Ireland 1890–1923 (London: Penguin, 2014); English Richard, Ernie O’Malley: IRA Intellectual (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998); Augusteijn Joost, From Public Defiance to Guerrilla Warfare: The Experience of Ordinary Volunteers in the Irish War of Independence 1916–1921 (Blackrock: Irish Academic Press, 1996); Hart Peter, The IRA and Its Enemies: Violence and Community in Cork, 1916–1923 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998); Hart Peter, The IRA at War 1916–1923 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003); Hart Peter, Mick: The Real Michael Collins (London: Macmillan, 2005).

19 Schmid (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research; Ramsay, ‘Why terrorism can’; Richards, Conceptualizing Terrorism; Saul Ben, Defining Terrorism in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006); Schmid Alex P. and Jongman Albert J. (eds), Political Terrorism (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 1988); Laqueur Walter, Terrorism (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1977); Claridge David, ‘State terrorism? Applying a definitional model’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 8:3 (1996).

20 Crenshaw, Explaining Terrorism, pp. 9–11, 34–50, 118–19, 130, 142; Richardson, What Terrorists Want, pp. 57–132; Guelke, The Age of Terrorism, p. 6; Bloom Mia, Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005); English Richard, Irish Freedom: The History of Nationalism in Ireland (London: Pan Macmillan, 2006); English, Terrorism; English, Armed Struggle.

21 Krueger Alan B., What Makes a Terrorist: Economics and the Roots of Terrorism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).

22 Cronin Audrey Kurth, How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009); cf. Crenshaw, Explaining Terrorism, pp. 193–222.

23 Abrahms Max, ‘Why terrorism does not work’, International Security, 31:2 (2006); Neumann Peter R. and Smith Michael L. R., The Strategy of Terrorism: How it Works, and Why it Fails (London: Routledge, 2008); Argomaniz Javier and Lynch Orla (eds), Victims of Terrorism: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Study (London: Routledge, 2015); Argomaniz Javier and Lynch Orla (eds), International Perspectives on Terrorist Victimization: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015); Gearty Conor, Liberty and Security (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013); Crenshaw Martha (ed.), Terrorism, Legitimacy, and Power: The Consequences of Political Violence (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1983).

24 Crenshaw, Explaining Terrorism, pp. 30, 39, 109, 178–82; Richardson, What Terrorists Want, pp. 243–81; English, Terrorism; English (ed.), Illusions of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism; LaFree Gary, Dugan Laura, and Miller Erin, Putting Terrorism in Context: Lessons from the Global Terrorism Database (London: Routledge, 2015), pp. 221222; Gearty Conor, Terror (London: Faber and Faber, 1991); Roberts Adam, ‘Terrorism research: Past, present, and future’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 38:1 (2015); Schmid Alex P., ‘Terrorism and democracy’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 4:2 (1992).

25 Hoffman Bruce, Anonymous Soldiers: The Struggle for Israel, 1917–1947 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2015); Hoffman Bruce and Reinares Fernando (eds), The Evolution of the Global Terrorist Threat: From 9/11 to Osama bin Laden’s Death (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014); Joshi Manoj, ‘On the razor’s edge: The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 19:1 (1996); Singh Rashmi, Hamas and Suicide Terrorism: Multi-Causal and Multi-Level Approaches (London: Routledge, 2011); Wege Carl A., ‘Hizbollah organization’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 17:2 (1994); English, Armed Struggle; Clark Robert P., The Basque Insurgents: ETA, 1952–1980 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984); Aust Stefan, Baader-Meinhof: The Inside Story of the RAF (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009); Hutchinson Martha Crenshaw, Revolutionary Terrorism: The FLN in Algeria, 1954–1962 (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1978); Scheuer Michael, Osama bin Laden (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011); Silke Andrew, ‘Rebel’s dilemma: the changing relationship between the IRA, Sinn Fein and paramilitary vigilantism in Northern Ireland’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 11:1 (1999); Hroub Khaled, Hamas: Political Thought and Practice (Washington: Institute for Palestine Studies, 2000); McDonald Henry and Holland Jack, INLA: Deadly Divisions (Dublin: Poolbeg Press, 1994); Zulaika Joseba, Basque Violence: Metaphor and Sacrament (Reno: University of Nevada Press, 1988); Hemmingby Cato and Bjorgo Tore, The Dynamics of a Terrorist Targeting Process: Anders B. Breivik and the 22 July Attacks in Norway (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016); Muir Angus M., ‘Terrorism and weapons of mass destruction: the case of Aum Shinrikyo’, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 22:1 (1999).

26 Crenshaw, Explaining Terrorism, pp. 51–66.

27 Jackson and Sinclair (ed), Contemporary Debates on Terrorism, p. 1.

28 For example, Martha Crenshaw, Bruce Hoffman, Adrian Guelke, Alex Schmid, Conor Gearty, Charles Townshend, Paul Wilkinson, Ariel Merari, Mark Juergensmeyer, David Rapoport, and Andrew Silke.

29 See, for example, Shapiro Jacob N., The Terrorist’s Dilemma: Managing Violent Covert Organizations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013); Berman Eli, Radical, Religious and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009); LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context; Pape Robert A., Dying to Win: Why Suicide Terrorists Do It (London: Gibson Square Books, 2006).

30 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context, p. 2.

31 See, for example, Crenshaw, Explaining Terrorism.

32 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context, pp. 10–11, 25–6, 48, 69, 95–8, 124, 145, 172, 202–4, 223–5.

33 Such scholars include Daniel Byman, Eli Berman, Bruce Hoffman, Martha Crenshaw, Mark Juergensmeyer, Dipak Gupta, John Horgan, Max Abrahms, Barbara Walter, Mia Bloom, David Rapoport, Alan Krueger, Laura Donohue, Joseba Zulaika, Jacob Shapiro, Robert Pape, David Laitin, and Barak Mendelsohn.

34 Among others: Alex Schmid, Javier Argomaniz, Anthony Richards, Andrew Silke, Gilbert Ramsay, Richard Jackson, Ariel Merari, Rashmi Singh, Claude Berrebi, Diego Muro, Esteban Klor, Stuart Croft, Conor Gearty, Adrian Guelke, Thomas Hegghammer, Donatella Della Porta, Tore Bjorgo, Rogelio Alonso, Fernando Reinares, and Diego Gambetta.

35 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context, p. 7.

36 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context.

37 Krueger, What Makes a Terrorist, pp. 44–6.

38 On peace and peacekeeping, see, for example, Fortna V. Page, Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents’ Choices After Civil War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008); cf. the very different approach evident in Richmond Oliver P. and Franks Jason, Liberal Peace Transitions: Between Statebuilding and Peacebuilding (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009), and MacGinty Roger, No War, No Peace: The Rejuvenation of Stalled Peace Processes and Peace Accords (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).

39 Fortna, Does Peacekeeping Work?, pp. 202–5.

40 Kalyvas Stathis N., ‘The paradox of terrorism in civil war’, Journal of Ethics, 8 (2004); Fortna V. Page, ‘Do terrorists win? Rebels’ use of terrorism and civil war outcomes’, International Organization, 69:3 (2015).

41 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context, p. 53.

42 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller in Putting Terrorism in Context suggest a global figure for terrorist attacks for 1972 at well under 1,000 (p. 29). Since the respected Conflict Archive on the Internet (CAIN) records well over 10,000 shooting incidents and well over 1,000 bomb explosions in Northern Ireland alone for 1972, that figure seems implausible.

43 LaFree, Dugan, and Miller, Putting Terrorism in Context, p. 27.

44 Ibid., p. 33.

45 Ibid., p. 81.

46 Kalyvas Stathis N., The Logic of Violence in Civil War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006); Staniland Paul, Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014); Weinstein Jeremy M., Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007); Hemmingby and Bjorgo, The Dynamics; Shapiro, The Terrorist’s Dilemma; Berman, Radical, Religious and Violent.

47 Pagden Anthony, The Enlightenment and Why It Still Matters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

48 Sacks Jonathan, Not in God’s Name: Confronting Religious Violence (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2015); Pinker Steven, The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and its Causes (London: Penguin, 2011); Chenoweth Erica and Stephan Maria J., Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Roberts Adam and Garton Ash Timothy (eds), Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-Violent Action from Gandhi to the Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009); Cannadine David, The Undivided Past: History Beyond Our Differences (London: Penguin, 2013); Baron-Cohen Simon, Zero Degrees of Empathy: a New Theory of Human Cruelty and Kindness (London: Penguin, 2012); O’Mara Shane, Why Torture Doesn’t Work: The Neuroscience of Interrogation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015).

49 For important examples among very many, see Townshend Charles, Political Violence in Ireland: Government and Resistance Since 1848 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983); Townshend Charles, The Republic: The Fight for Irish Independence (London: Penguin, 2013); Zulaika, Basque Violence; Clark, The Basque Insurgents; Aust, Baader-Meinhof.

50 English (ed.), Illusions of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of International Security
  • ISSN: 2057-5637
  • EISSN: 2057-5645
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-international-security
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 80
Total number of PDF views: 2097 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1105 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.