Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T17:44:39.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes towards highly skilled and low‐skilled immigration in Europe: A survey experiment in 15 European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Elias Naumann ,
Lukas F. Stoetzer  and
Giuseppe Pietrantuono
Elias Naumann*
Affiliation:
University of Mannheim, Germany
Lukas F. Stoetzer
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Giuseppe Pietrantuono
Affiliation:
Immigration Policy Lab ETH Zurich, Switzerland
*
Address for correspondence: Elias Naumann, SFB 884 ‘Political Economy of Reforms’, University of Mannheim, B6 30–32, 68131 Mannheim, Germany. Email: naumann@uni-mannheim.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To what extent do economic concerns drive anti‐migrant attitudes? Key theoretical arguments extract two central motives: increased labour market competition and the fiscal burden linked to the influx of migrants. This article provides new evidence regarding the impact of material self‐interest on attitudes towards immigrants. It reports the results of a survey experiment embedded in representative surveys in 15 European countries before and after the European refugee crisis in 2014. As anticipated by the fiscal burden argument, it is found that rich natives prefer highly skilled over low‐skilled migration more than low‐income respondents do. Moreover, the study shows that these tax concerns among the wealthy are stronger if fiscal exposure to migration is high. No support is found for the labour market competition argument predicting that natives will be most opposed to migrants with similar skills. The results suggest that highly skilled migrants are preferred over low‐skilled migrants irrespective of natives’ skill levels.

Keywords

migrationattitudeslabour market competition modelwelfare state modelcross‐country survey experiment

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 1009 - 1030
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Borjas, G.J. (1999). The economic analysis of immigration. Handbook of Labor Economics 3: 1697–1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, G.J., Freeman, R.B. & Katz, L.F. (1996). Searching for the effect of immigration on the labor market. American Economic Review 86(2): 246–251.Google Scholar
Ceobanu, A.M. & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerna, L. (2013). The EU Blue Card: Preferences, policies and negotiations between member states. Migration Studies 2(1): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J. et al. (1997). Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. Journal of Politics 59(3): 858–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, R.M. & Donnelly, M.J. (2012). Sectoral economies, economic contexts and attitudes toward immigration. Journal of Politics 75(1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Parliament (2015). Economic challenges and prospects on the refugee influx. Briefing 2015. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
Facchini, G. & Mayda, A.M. (2009). Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries. Review of Economics and Statistics 91(2): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G.P. & Kessler, A.K. (2008). Political economy and migration policy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(4): 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A., Huber, G., Biggers, D. & Hendry, D. (2017). Self‐Interest, beliefs and policy opinions: Understanding how economic beliefs affect immigration policy preferences. Political Research Quarterly 70(1): 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagendoorn, A. & Nekuee, S. (1999). Education and racism: A cross national inventory of positive effects of education on ethnic tolerance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J. & Hiscox, M.J. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low‐skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review 104(1): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J. & Hopkins, D.J. (2015). The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, M.J. & Margalit, Y. (2015). Do concerns about labor market competition shape attitudes toward immigration? New evidence. Journal of International Economics 97(1): 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, R. & Randeria, S. (2016). Tensions of refugee politics in Europe. Science 353(6303): 994–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, G.H., Scheve, K. & Slaughter, M.J. (2007). Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Economics and Politics 19(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbling, M. (2011). Why Swiss‐Germans dislike Germans: Opposition to culturally similar and highly skilled immigrants. European Societies 13(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbling, M. & Kalkum, D. (2017). Migration policy trends in OECD countries. Journal of European Public Policy, online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1361466.Google Scholar
Helbling, M. & Kriesi, H. (2014). Why citizens prefer high‐over low‐skilled immigrants: Labor market competition, welfare state and deservingness. European Sociological Review 30(5): 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hello, E., Scheepers, P. & Sleegers, P. (2006). Why the more educated are less inclined to keep ethnic distance: An empirical test of four explanations. Ethnic and Racial Studies 29(5): 959–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjerm, M. (2001). Education, xenophobia and nationalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27(1): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO) (2012). International standard classification of occupations: ISCO 08. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2005). Threatened by diversity: Why restrictive asylum and immigration policies appeal to Western Europeans. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15(1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right‐wing populists in Western Europe? Re‐examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. et al. (2013). Do attitudes about immigration predict willingness to admit individual immigrants? A cross‐national test of the person‐positivity bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(3): 641–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y. & Mo, C.H. (2013). Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: Distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, A.M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross‐country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3): 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, M. (2011). How do high‐skilled natives view high‐skilled immigrants? A test of trade theory predictions. European Journal of Political Economy 27(2): 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2013). International migration outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ortega, F. & Polavieja, J.G. (2012). Labor‐market exposure as a determinant of attitudes toward immigration. Labour Economics 19(3): 298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polavieja, J.G. (2016). Labour‐market competition, recession and anti‐immigrant sentiments in Europe: Occupational and environmental drivers of competitive threat. Socio‐Economic Review 14(3): 395–417.Google Scholar
Rho, S. & Tomz, M. (2017). Why don't trade preferences reflect economic self‐interest? International Organization 71(1): 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Römer, F. (2017). Generous to all or ‘insiders only’? Welfare state generosity and immigrant welfare rights. Journal of European Social Policy 27(2): 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, K.F. & Slaughter, M.J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics 83(1): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt‐Catran, A. & Spies, D. (2014). Do parties ‘playing the race card’ undermine natives’ support for redistribution? Evidence from Europe. Comparative Political Studies 47(4): 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, P.M., Hagendoorn, L. & Prior, M. (2004). Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review 98(1): 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, S. (1998). Tax policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (2016). Historical institutionalism and experimental methods. In Fioretos, O., Falleti, T.G. & Sheingate, A. (eds), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Naumann et al. supplementary material

Naumann et al. supplementary material
Download Naumann et al. supplementary material(File)
File 208 KB