Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T13:18:37.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contingent Diffusion of Parliamentary Oversight Institutions in the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2026

Nils‐Christian Bormann  and
Thomas Winzen
Nils‐Christian Bormann*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Exeter, UK
Thomas Winzen
Affiliation:
Centre for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
*
Address for correspondence: Nils‐Christian Bormann, Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK. E‐mail: n.bormann@exeter.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What explains the variation in institutional adaptation of national parliaments to European integration? Whereas the existing literature has mainly focused on domestic conditions, this article explains institutional adaptation to integration by focusing on inter‐parliamentary diffusion. The argument draws on ‘learning’ mechanisms of diffusion on the demand side and on ‘emulation’ mechanisms on the supply side. Parliamentary demand for external inspiration is related to uncertainty about functional oversight institutions, and the selection of sources to perceptions of similarity and success. Demand arises in new European Union member parliaments and young democracies that then turn towards culturally alike countries and old democracies. Using spatial econometrics, support is demonstrated for the argument in the article while ruling out alternative diffusion mechanisms such as spatial proximity and learning from Scandinavian frontrunners once links along cultural similarity and democratic experience are controlled for. The results underline the limits of the ‘isolated polity’ approach in the comparative study of institutions in Europe's closely integrated political system, while also showing that, even in this favourable environment, diffusion pathways are contingent on the mechanisms generating demand among policy makers and shaping their selection of sources for external information.

Keywords

diffusionEuropean Unionnational parliaments

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , August 2016 , pp. 589 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Auel, K., Rozenberg, O. & Tacea, A. (2015). To scrutinise or not to scrutinise? Explaining variation in EU—related activities in national parliaments. West European Politics 38(2): 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N., Gleditsch, K.S. & Beardsley, K. (2006). Space is more than geography: Using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50(1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, A. (2004). Path‐dependent institutions and strategic veto players: National parliaments in the European Union. West European Politics 27(5): 875–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, T. (1997). National parliaments and EU affairs committees: Notes on empirical variation and competing explanations. Journal of European Public Policy 4(3): 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, T. (2000). The European Union as the next step of delegation and accountability. European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (1999). Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review 93(3): 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T.A. (2005). Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossaert, D. (2001). The Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies: From a toothless tiger to a critical watchdog? In Maurer, A. & Wessels, W. (eds), National parliaments on their ways to Europe: Losers or latecomers. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Brinks, D. & Coppedge, M. (2006). Diffusion is no illusion: Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies 39(4): 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzogány, A. (2013). Learning from the best? Interparliamentary networks and the parliamentary scrutiny of EU decision‐making. In Crum, B. & Fossum, J.E. (eds), Practices of inter‐parliamentary coordination in international politics. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, L.‐E. (2001). Nationalism and bounded integration: What it would take to construct a European demos. European Journal of International Relations 7(2): 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J.A. (2007). Presidentialism, parliamentarism and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crum, B. & Fossum, J.E. (2009). The multilevel parliamentary field: A framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU. European Political Science Review 1(2): 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. (2001). Incrementalism and path dependence: European integration and institutional change in national parliaments. Journal of Common Market Studies 39: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B.A. & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition or learning? Annual Review of Sociology 33: 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, A. & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, R.J. & Hays, J.C. (2007). Spatial econometric models of cross‐sectional interdependence in political science panel and time—series—cross—section data. Political Analysis 15(2): 140–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, R.J. & Hays, J.C. (2008). Empirical models of spatial interdependence. In Box‐Steffensmeier, J.M., Collier, D. & Brady, H.E. (eds), Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2012). Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas and policies. In Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (eds), Handbook of international relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, K.S. (2002). All international politics is local: The diffusion of conflict, integration and democratization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, K.H. & Meyer‐Sahling, J.‐H. (2008). The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives. Living Reviews in European Governance 3(2). Available online at: www.livingreviews.org/lreg‐2008‐2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamerly, I. (2012). Christian democratic parties and the domestic parliamentary response to European integration. Journal of Church and State 54(2): 214–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, J.C., Kachi, A. & Franzese, R.J. Jr (2010). A spatial model incorporating dynamic, endogenous network interdependence: A political science application. Statistical Methodology 7(3): 406–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachtenfuchs, M., Diez, T. & Jung, S. (1998). Which Europe? Conflicting models of a legitimate European political order. European Journal of International Relations 4(4): 409–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungar, A.‐C. (2010). The choice of parliamentary EU scrutiny mechanisms in the new member states. In Jacobsson, B. (ed.), The European Union and the Baltic States. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. (2007). Christian democracy and the origins of European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlas, J. (2011). Parliamentary control of EU affairs in Central and Eastern Europe: Explaining the variation. Journal of European Public Policy 18(2): 258–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlas, J. (2012). National parliamentary control of EU affairs: Institutional design after enlargement. West European Politics 35(5): 1095–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kietz, D. (2006). What Accounts for National Divergence: The Baltic Parliaments in EU Affairs. Paper presented at the EU‐Consent PhD Summer School, Budapest, 29 April–5 May.Google Scholar
LeSage, J.P. & Pace, R.K. (2011). Pitfalls in higher order model extensions of basic spatial regression methodology. Review of Regional Studies 41(1): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B. & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). Differentiated integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, M.G., Jaggers, K. & Gurr, T.R. (2011). The Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2010. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Martin, S. & Depauw, S. (2011). The Impact of Multiparty Government on the Internal Organization of Legislatures. Paper presented at the 69th Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 31 March–3 April.Google Scholar
Maurer, A. & Wessels, W. (eds) (2001). National parliaments on their ways to Europe: Losers or latecomers. Baden‐Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Meseguer, C. & Gilardi, F. (2009). What is new in the study of policy diffusion? Review of International Political Economy 16(3): 527–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, B.F., Guth, J.L. & Fraser, C.R. (2001). Does religion matter? Christianity and public support for the European Union. European Union Politics 2(2): 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, E. & Plümper, T. (2015). W. Political Science Research and Methods 4(1):175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brennan, J. & Raunio, T. (2007). Conclusion: National parliaments gradually learning to play the European game? In National parliaments within the enlarged European Union. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raunio, T. (2005). Holding governments accountable in European affairs: Explaining cross‐national variation. Journal of Legislative Studies 11(3–4): 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raunio, T. (2009). National parliaments and European integration: What we know and agenda for future research. Journal of Legislative Studies 15(4): 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raunio, T. (2011). The gatekeepers of European integration? The functions of national parliaments in the EU political system. Journal of European Integration 33(3): 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B.A., Dobbin, F. & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization 60(4): 781–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, W.R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46: 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, M.D. & Gleditsch, K.S. (2008). Spatial regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, B. (2005). Roles and orientations of members of parliament in the EU context: Congruence or difference? Europeanisation or not? Journal of Legislative Studies 11(3): 446–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winzen, T. (2010). Political integration and national parliaments in Europe. Living Reviews in Democracy 2. Available online at: www.livingreviews.org/lrd‐2010‐5Google Scholar
Winzen, T. (2012). National parliamentary control of European Union affairs: A cross‐national and longitudinal comparison. West European Politics 35(3): 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winzen, T. (2013). European integration and national parliamentary oversight institutions. European Union Politics 14(2): 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winzen, T., Roederer‐Rynning, C. & Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Parliamentary co‐evolution: National parliamentary reactions to the empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy 22(1): 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. & Escribà‐Folch, A. (2012). Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: Transitions to democracy and subsequent autocracy. British Journal of Political Science 42(2): 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bormann and Winzen supplementary material

Online Appendix
Download Bormann and Winzen supplementary material(File)
File 614.9 KB