Hostname: page-component-6565fbc58-wqvqn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-12T03:34:48.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties' discourse in Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Jan Jagers  and
Stefaan Walgrave
Jan Jagers*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Belgium
Stefaan Walgrave
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Belgium
*
Address for correspondence: Jan Jagers, Media, Movements and Politics (M2P), University of Antwerp (UIA), Korte St Annastraat 6, B‐2000 Antwerp, Belgium. E‐mail: Jan.jagers@ua.ac.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The scientific debate about populism has been revitalised by the recent rise of extreme‐right parties in Western Europe. Within the broad discussion about populism and its relationship with extreme‐right, this article is confined to three topics: a conceptual, an epistemological and an empirical issue. First, taking a clear position in the ongoing definition struggle, populism is defined primarily as a specific political communication style. Populism is conceived of as a political style essentially displaying proximity of the people, while at the same time taking an anti‐establishment stance and stressing the (ideal) homogeneity of the people by excluding specific population segments. Second, it is pointed out that defining populism as a style enables one to turn it into a useful concept that has too often remained vague and blurred. Third, drawing on an operational definition of populism, a comparative discourse analysis of the political party broadcasts of the Belgian parties is carried out. The quantitative analysis leads to a clear conclusion. In terms of the degree and the kinds of populism embraced by the six political parties under scrutiny, the extreme‐right party Vlaams Blok behaves very differently from the other Belgian parties. Its messages are a copybook example of populism.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 319 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2007 (European Consortium for Political Research)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abts, K. (2004). Het Populistisch Appel. Voorbij de populaire communicatiestijl en de ordinaire democratiekritiek. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 25: 451–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anckar, K. (2000). Size and party system fragmentation. Party Politics 6(3): 305–328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, H.‐G. (2004). La droite populiste en Europe. Extrême et démocrate? Paris: Corlet. Google Scholar
Billiet, J. & De Witte, H. (1995). Attitudinal dispositions to vote for a ‘new’ extreme right‐wing party: The case of ‘Vlaams Blok. European Journal of Political Research 27: 181–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billiet, J. & Swyngedouw, M. (1995). De keuze tussen groen en extreem‐rechts. Sporen van een nieuwe breuklijn. Res Publica 35(2): 247–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2001). Ik stel vast: politiek taalgebruik, politieke vernieuwing en verrechtsing. Berchem: EPO. Google Scholar
Buzzi, P. (1994). Le front national: entre national‐populisme et idéologie d'extrême droite. Notes et études documentaires 4996: 15–36. Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. London: London Junction. Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47(1): 2–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffé, H. (2005a). Do individual factors explain the different success of the two Belgian extreme right parties? Acta Politica 40: 74–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffé, H. (2005b). Extreem‐rechts in Vlaanderen en Wallonië. Het verschil. Roeselare: Roularta Books. Google Scholar
De Benoist, A. (2000). Wie is er bang van het populisme? Telos 96: 6–8. Google Scholar
Di Tella, T.S. (1997). Populism into the twenty‐first century. Government and Opposition 32(2): 187–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, K. (2001). De zorgeloze consensus. De statuten van het Vlaams Blok en de partijentheorie. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 22(1): 63–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elchardus, M. (1994). Gekaapte Deugden. Samenleving en Politiek 1(1): 20–27. Google Scholar
Elchardus, M. (2001). Moet populisme omarmd worden als politieke vernieuwing? Socialisme en democratie 58: 226–258. Google Scholar
Elchardus, M. & Pelleriaux, K. (1998). De polis verdeeld – hoe de kiezers links en rechts herdefiniëren. In Swyngedouw, M.et al. (eds), De (on)redelijke kiezer. Leuven: ACCO. Google Scholar
Hennessy, A. (1969). Latin America. In Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (eds), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson. Google Scholar
Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter‐revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right‐wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 22: 3–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R.S. & Mair, P. (1994). How parties organize: Change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies. London: SageCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazin, M. (1995). The populist persuasion: An American history. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. & McGann, A.J. (1995). Radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Lane, J‐E. & Ersson, S. (1991). Politics and society in Western Europe. London: Sage. Google Scholar
Maddens, B. (1998). De partijkeuze en de beleidsthema's. In Swyngedouw, M.et al. (eds),De (on)redelijke kiezer. Leuven: ACCO. Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2002). Populist democracy versus party democracy. In Mény, Y. & Surel, Y. (eds), Democracies and the populist challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar
Mény, Y. & Surel, Y. (2000). Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Paris: Fayard. Google Scholar
Mény, Y. & Surel, Y. (2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2000). The ideology of the extreme right. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39: 542–563. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfahl‐Traughber, A. (1994). Volkes Stimme? Rechtspopulismus in Europa. Bonn: Dietz. Google Scholar
Swyngedouw, M. (1992). Waar voor je waarden. De opkomst van Vlaams Blok en Groen! in de jaren '80. Leuven: ISPO. Google Scholar
Swyngedouw, M. (2001). The subjective cognitive and affective map of extreme right voters: Using open‐ended questions in exit‐polls. Electoral Studies 20(2): 217–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Taguieff, P.‐A. (1995). Political science confronts populism: From a conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos 103, 9–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguieff, P.‐A. (1998). Populismes et antipopulismes: le choc des argumentations. Mots – Les langages du Politique 55: 5–26. Google Scholar
Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M. & Tillie, J. (2000). Anti‐immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Journal of Political Research 37: 77–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, S. & Deswert, K. (2004). The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication 21(4): 479–500. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walicki, A. (1969). Russia. In Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (eds), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson. Google Scholar
Wievorka, M. (1993). La démocratie à l'épreuve: nationalisme, populisme et ethnicité. Paris: La découverte. Google Scholar
Worsley, P. (1969). The concept of populism. In Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (eds), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson. Google Scholar