Skip to main content
×
×
Home

3D Bioprinting Regulations: a UK/EU Perspective

  • Phoebe LI and Alex FAULKNER
Abstract

This report introduces the challenges 3D bioprinting poses to the existing legal regime across bioethics, safety, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering. We briefly review the 3D bioprinting technology and look into the relevant regulatory instruments for the pre-printing, printing, and post-printing stages. Special attention is paid to the applications of the EU Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Regulation and the new Medical Device Regulation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      3D Bioprinting Regulations: a UK/EU Perspective
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      3D Bioprinting Regulations: a UK/EU Perspective
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      3D Bioprinting Regulations: a UK/EU Perspective
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Phoebe Li is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Sussex (e-mail: Phoebe.Li@sussex.ac.uk). Alex Faulkner is Professor in Sociology of Biomedicine and Healthcare Policy, University of Sussex. This article is based on the project “Mass customisation governance: regulation, liability, and intellectual property of re-distributed manufacturing in 3D printing”, funded by the UK EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Institute for Manufacturing at Cambridge University, EP/M017656/1). All data created during this research are openly available from the University of Cambridge data archive at https://capturingthevalue.wordpress.com/3dp-rdm-reports/.

Footnotes
References
Hide All

1 Council Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, amending Council Directive (EC) 2001/83/EC (ATMP Regulation).

2 Council Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells (EUTCD, or the Parent Directive).

3 Council Directive (EC) 2009/120 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community Code relating to medicinal products for human use as regards advanced therapy medicinal products [2009] OJ L 242/3.

4 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices, and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation(EC) No 1223/2009, Brussels, 15, June 2016, 9364/3/16 REV 3; Revisions of Medical Devices, available at <https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/medical-devices/regulatory-framework/revision_en> (accessed 31 March 2017).

5 P, Hourd, et al., “A 3D-bioprinting Exemplar of the Consequences of the Regulatory Requirement on Customized Process” (2015) 10(7) Regenerative Medicine 863883 .

6 Printing a Bit of Me”, The Economist, 8 March 2014, available at <http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21598322-bioprinting-building-living-tissue-3d-printer-becoming-new-business> (accessed 31 March 2017).

7 Hourd, , et al , supra note 5.

8 European Directive 2004/23/EC (Parent Directive).

9 The First Technical Directive (European Directive 2006/17/EC).

10 The Second Technical Directive (European Directive 2006/86/EC).

11 The Third Technical Directive (European Directive 2012/39/EU).

12 HTA website, <https://www.hta.gov.uk/> (accessed 31 March 2017).

13 M Varkey, and Atala, AOrgan Bioprinting: a Closer Look at Ethics and Policies” (2015) Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy 275, 288 .

14 JF Douglas, and Cronin, AJThe Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: an Act of Encouragement, Not Enforcement” (2015) 78(2) Modern Law Review 324 .

15 Hourd, et al ., supra note 5.

16 Art. 18a, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices, and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, 9364/3/16 REV 3, Brussels, 15 June 2016 (MDR).

17 ibid Art. 2(1)(1) MDR.

18 MDR, Annex VII Section II.3.

19 MDR, Annex II Technical documentation.

20 Art. 2(1)(a) ATMP.

21 Art. 2(1)(c) ATMP.

22 Recital (6) ATMP.

23 “Supply unlicensed medicinal products in the UK (Specials)”, available at <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supply-unlicensed-medicinal-products-specials> (accessed 31 March 2017).

24 Art. 15(4) ATMP.

* Phoebe Li is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Sussex (e-mail: ). Alex Faulkner is Professor in Sociology of Biomedicine and Healthcare Policy, University of Sussex. This article is based on the project “Mass customisation governance: regulation, liability, and intellectual property of re-distributed manufacturing in 3D printing”, funded by the UK EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Institute for Manufacturing at Cambridge University, EP/M017656/1). All data created during this research are openly available from the University of Cambridge data archive at https://capturingthevalue.wordpress.com/3dp-rdm-reports/.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Risk Regulation
  • ISSN: 1867-299X
  • EISSN: 2190-8249
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-risk-regulation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 57
Total number of PDF views: 272 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 273 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st July 2017 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.