Skip to main content

The Fixation of (Moral) Belief: Making Imperial Administration Modern

  • Nicholas Hoover Wilson (a1)

This article argues that the transition between early-modern and modern organization of empires—especially the administrative outlooks and institutional logics used to govern them—revolved around how moral conflict was viewed within imperial organizations themselves and by metropolitan audiences. Early modern imperial organizations were deeply patrimonial, and hence relied on a style of embedded moral reasoning that distanced and segmented their affairs from the metropole. By contrast, modern empires order what they govern in hierarchies that are nominally objective and whose criteria seem universal. Using a case study of the British Empire’s crisis and transformation at the turn of the 19th century, I argue that modern imperial administration emerged because networks of moral justification, which provided the scaffolding for patrimonial early-modern empire, eroded in the face of “disinterested” metropolitan scrutiny. This scrutiny created an audience for bitter political and moral conflicts among imperial administrators, who then used disembedded moral claims to mobilize support.

Cet article étudie le rôle de la perception publique du conflit moral pour la transition entre les organisations impériales de type pré-moderne et moderne, en particulier du point de vue des approches administratives et des logiques institutionnelles mobilisées pour les gouverner. Les premières organisations impériales modernes étaient profondément patrimoniales et s’appuyaient sur un style « implanté » (embedded) de raisonnement moral qui contribuait à éloigner et segmenter leurs affaires courantes des métropoles. À l’opposé, les empires modernes ordonnent ce qu’ils gouvernent dans des hiérarchies théoriquement objectives et sur la base de critères qui semblent universels. À l’aide d’une étude de cas consacrée à la crise et à la transformation de l’empire britannique au tournant du xixe siècle, cet article montre que l’émergence de l’administration impériale moderne repose sur l’affaiblissement des réseaux de justification morale, qui constituaient l’échafaudage de l’empire patrimonial, face à un contrôle métropolitain de type « désintéressé ». Ce contrôle a contribué à créer une audience pour les conflits politiques et moraux entre les administrateurs impériaux, qui ont ensuite utilisé des revendications morales « désimplantées » (disembedded) pour mobiliser leur soutien.

Beim Übergang von vormodern zu modern organisierten Weltreichen, und hier insbesondere in puncto Verwaltungsperspektiven und institutionelle Logik, um sie zu regieren, wurde die Frage, wie moralische Konflikte innerhalb der Reichsverbände einerseits und im Mutterland andererseits gesehen wurden, zum Angelpunkt. Neuzeitliche Imperien waren vermögensrechtlich aufgestellt und stützten sich auf eine moralisch verankerte Argumentation, die zu einer Trennung ihrer Angelegenheiten vom Mutterland führte. Ganz anders moderne Weltreiche, die ihre Regierungsstruktur hierarchisch gliedern, die rein formal betrachtet objektiv sind und deren Kriterien universell erscheinen. Aufbauend auf einer Fallstudie, die sich mit der Krise und Umwandlung des britischen Empires Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts auseinandersetzt, behauptet dieser Artikel, dass die Entstehung der modernen Kolonialreichsverwaltung auf die Zerrüttung der moralischen Rechtfertigungsnetze, das ursprüngliche Gerüst der frühen, vermögensrechtlich organisierten Weltreiche, zurückzuführen ist, die sich wiederum durch eine “desinteressierte” Überprüfung durch das Mutterland erklären lässt. Diese Überprüfung führte zu harten politischen und moralischen Konflikten zwischen imperialen Verwaltern, die schließlich durch “unverankerte” moralische Anforderungen Unterstützung zu erwirken suchten.

Hide All
Abbott, Andrew, 2005. “Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions”, Sociological Theory, 23 (3): 245-274.
Abend, Gabriel, 2008. “Two Main Problems in the Sociology of Morality”, Theory and Society, 37 (2): 87-125.
Abend, Gabriel, 2014. The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Adams, Julia, 1996. “Principals and Agents, Colonialists and Company Men: The Decay of Colonial Control in the Dutch East Indies”, American Sociological Review, 61 (1): 12-28.
Adams, Julia, 2007. The Familial State (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).
Barkey, Karen, 2008. Empire of Difference (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Bayly, C. A., 1990. Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas, 1967. The Social Construction of Reality (New York, Doubleday).
Boltanski, Luc, 1999. Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics (Cambridge, UK/New York, Cambridge University Press).
Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth, new edition, (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Bourdieu, Pierre, 2004. “From the King’s House to the Reason of State: A Model of the Genesis of the Bureaucratic Field”, Constellations 11 (1): 16-36.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Bourne, John, 1977. “The Civil and Military Patronage of the East India Company 1784-1858”, Leicester, Leicester University Press.
Bowen, H. V., 1991. Revenue and Reform: The Indian Problem in British Politics, 1757-1773 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Bowen, H. V., 2006. The Business of Empire: The East India Company and Imperial Britain, 1756-1833. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Bowen, John, 1955. “The East India Company’s Education of Its Own Servants”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 87 (3-4): 105-123.
Braddyll, John, 1746. The Vindication of Mr. John Braddyll, against Mr. Henry Lowther. In a Letter Humbly Adress’d to the Honourable the Court of Directors for Affairs of the United Company of Merchants of England Trading to the East-Indies. With a Proper Appendix. (Farmington Hills, Michigan, Gale Ecco).
Breiger, Ronald L., 1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups”, Social Forces, 53 (2): 181-190.
Brewer, John, 1976. Party Ideology and Popular Politics at The Accession of George III (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Chatterjee, Partha, 1993. The Nation and Its Fragments (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Cohn, Bernard S., 1987. “The Recruitment and Training of British Civil Servants in India, 1600–1860”, in Cohn, B. S., An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays (New York, Oxford University Press: 500-553).
Compton, J. M., 1968. “Open Competition and the Indian Civil Service, 1854-1876”, The English Historical Review, 83 (327): 265-284.
Dewey, C. J., 1973. “The Education of a Ruling Caste: The Indian Civil Service in the Era of Competitive Examination”, The English Historical Review, 88 (347): 262-285.
Dewey, Clive, 1993. Anglo-Indian Attitudes: The Mind of the Indian Civil Service (London, The Hambledon Press).
Dirks, Nicholas B., 2009. The Scandal of Empire: India and the Creation of Imperial Britain (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Dodwell, Henry, 1920. Dupleix and Clive: The Beginning of Empire (London, Methuen).
Dodwell, Henry, 1926. The Nabobs of Madras (London, Williams and Norgate Ltd).
D’Oyly, Charles and Ackermann, Rudolph, 1828. Tom Raw, the Griffin: A Burlesque Poem, in Twelve Cantos: Illustrated by Twenty-Five Engravings, Descriptive of the Adventures of a Cadet in the East India Company’s Service, from the Period of His Quitting England to His Obtaining a Staff Situation in India (London, printed for R. Ackermann).
Emirbayer, Mustafa, 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”, American Journal of Sociology, 103 (2): 281-317.
Erikson, Emily, 2014. Between Monopoly and Free Trade: The English East India Company, 1600-1757 (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Fligstein, Neil, 2001. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields”, Sociological Theory, 19 (2): 105-125.
Fligstein, Neil and McAdam, Doug, 2012. A Theory of Fields (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Foote, Samuel and Colman, George, 1778. The Nabob; a Comedy, in Three Acts. As It Is Performed at the Theatre-Royal in the Haymarket (London, printed by T. Sherlock, for T. Cadell).
Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran, 2017. “Seeing like a Market”, Socio-Economic Review, 15 (1): 9-29.
Ghosh, Suresh Chandra, 1970. The Social Condition of the British Community in Bengal: 1757-1800 Ann Arbor MI, University of Michigan).
Go, Julian, 2000. “Chains of Empire, Projects of State: Political Education and U.S. Colonial Rule in Puerto Rico and the Philippines”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 42 (2): 333-362.
Gupta, Akhil, 1995. “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State”, American Ethnologist, 22 (2): 375-402.
Hacking, Ian, 2004. Historical Ontology (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Harrison, Graham, 1999. “Corruption as ‘Boundary Politics’: The State, Democratisation, and Mozambique’s Unstable Liberalisation”, Third World Quarterly, 20 (3): 537-550.
Hejeebu, Santhi, 2005. “Contract Enforcement in the English East India Company”, The Journal of Economic History, 65 (2): 496-523.
Hirschman, Daniel and Reed, Isaac Ariail, 2014. “Formation Stories and Causality in Sociology”, Sociological Theory, 32 (4): 259-282.
Hitlin, Steven and Vaisey, Stephen, eds., 2010. Handbook of the Sociology of Morality (Berlin, Springer Science & Business Media).
Jasper, James M., 1999. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Lawson, Philip and Phillips, Jim, 1984. “‘Our Execrable Banditti’: Perceptions of Nabobs in Mid-Eighteenth Century Britain”, Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 16 (3): 225-241.
Lenman, Bruce and Lawson, Philip, 1983. “Robert Clive, the ‘Black Jagir’, and British Politics”, The Historical Journal, 26 (4): 801-829.
Leonard, Spencer, 2014. “‘A Theatre of Disputes’: The East India Company Election of 1764 as the Founding of British India”, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 42 (4): 593-624.
Leonard, Spencer, 1965. The Impeachment of Warren Hastings, (London: Oxford University Press).
Leonard, Spencer, 1976. East Indian Fortunes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Leonard, Spencer, 1981. “Introduction”, in Marshall, P. J. and Todd, W., eds., The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke: India: Madras and Bengal, 1774-1785, vol. V. (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Leonard, Spencer, 1987. Bengal: The British Bridgehead (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Leonard, Spencer, 1997. “British Society in India under the East India Company”, Modern Asian Studies, 31 (1): 89-108.
Leonard, Spencer, 2005. The Making and Unmaking of Empires (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Martin, John Levi, 2009. Social Structures (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
McLaren, Martha, 2001. British India & British Scotland, 1780-1830: Career Building, Empire Building, and a Scottish School of Thought on Indian Governance. 1st ed. (Akron, Ohio, University of Akron Press).
Menand, Louis, 1997. Pragmatism: A Reader (New York, Vintage Books).
Metcalf, Thomas, 1994. Ideologies of the Raj (London, Cambridge University Press).
Metcalf, Thomas, 2015. Aftermath of Revolt: India 1857-1970 (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Mitchell, Timothy, 1988. Colonising Egypt (Berkeley, University of California Press).
Moore, R. J., 1964. “The Abolition of Patronage in the Indian Civil Service and the Closure of Haileybury College”, The Historical Journal, 7 (2): 246-257.
Neild-Basu, Susan, 1984. “The Dubashes of Madras”, Modern Asian Studies, 18 (1): 1-31.
Nightingale, Pamela, 1985. Fortune and Integrity (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Pickett, Catherine, 2011. Bibliography of the East India, annotated edition (London, British Library Publishing).
Polanyi, Karl, 1944. The Great Transformation (New York, Beacon Press).
Ricœur, Paul, 1995. Oneself as Another, reissue edition (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Rothschild, Emma, 2011. The Inner Life of Empires: An Eighteenth-Century History (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric, 1975. The Semisovereign People (New York, Dryden Press).
Schutz, Alfred, 1967. Phenomenology of the Social World, first edition (Evanston, IL., Northwestern University Press).
Shapin, Steven, 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Sherman, Arnold A., 1976. “Pressure from Leadenhall: The East India Company Lobby, 1660-1678”, The Business History Review, 50 (3): 329-355.
Smith, Adam, 2002. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Spear, Percival, 1963. The Nabobs (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Steinmetz, George, 2007. The Devil’s Handwriting (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Steinmetz, George, 2014. “The Sociology of Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonialism”, Annual Review of Sociology, 40 (1): 77-103.
Stern, Philip J., 2011. The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Stokes, Eric, 1986. The Peasant Armed: The Indian Rebellion of 1857, First edition, edited by Bayly, C. A. (Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press).
Stokes, Eric, 1989. The English Utilitarians and India (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Sutherland, Lucy S., 1952. The East India Company in Eighteenth-Century Politics (London, Hyperion Press).
Tavory, Iddo, 2011. “The Question of Moral Action: A Formalist Position”, Sociological Theory, 29 (4): 272-293.
Taylor, Charles, 1985. Human Agency and Language (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Trevelyan, Sir George Otto, 1864. The Competition Wallah (Basingstoke, Macmillan).
Wilson, Jon E., 2007. “Anxieties of Distance: Codification in Early Colonial Bengal”, Modern Intellectual History, 4 (1): 7-23.
Wilson, Jon E., 2011. The Domination of Strangers. (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
Wilson, Kathleen, 1995. The Sense of the People: Politics, Culture, and Imperialism in England, 1715-1785. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Wilson, Nicholas Hoover, 2011. “From Reflection to Refraction: State Administration in British India, circa 1770-1855.” The American Journal of Sociology, 116 (5): 1437-1477.
Wilson, Nicholas Hoover, 2015. “‘A State in Disguise of a Merchant’? The English East India Company as a Strategic Action Field, Ca. 1763?1834”, in Erikson, E., ed., Chartering Capitalism: Organizing Markets, States, and Publics, 29, Political Power and Social Theory (Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 257-285) Retrieved [].
Wilson, Nicholas Hoover, 2016. “Moral Accounting as Field Foundation in an Early Modern Empire: The English East India Company in the Late Eighteenth Century”, The Sociological Review Monographs, 64 (2): 61-78.
Wuthnow, Robert, 1987. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis (Berkeley, University of California Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed