Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Sabbagh, Clara and Vanhuysse, Pieter 2014. Betwixt and Between Global and Domestic Forms of Justice: The Israeli Case Over Time. Social Justice Research, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 118.

    Opp, Karl-Dieter 2013. Norms and rationality. Is moral behavior a form of rational action?. Theory and Decision, Vol. 74, Issue. 3, p. 383.

    Domínguez, Gloria and Shannon, Margaret 2011. A wish, a fear and a complaint: understanding the (dis)engagement of forest owners in forest management. European Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 130, Issue. 3, p. 435.

    Bennich-Björkman, Li 2007. Political Culture under Institutional Pressure.

    Hoem, Jan M. Neyer, Gerda and Andersson, Gunnar 2006. Education and childlessness. Demographic Research, Vol. 14, p. 331.

    Bolonyai, Agnes 2005. 'Who was the best?': Power, knowledge and rationality in bilingual girls' code choices1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Mészáros, József 2004. Racionális döntések elmélete és a társadalomtudományok. Társadalomkutatás, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 427.

    Ajzner, Jan 2000. Marxist Axioms as Self-Contradictory Parsonian Statements in Sociology. Human Studies, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 157.

    Myers-Scotton, Carol 2000. Explaining the role of norms and rationality in codeswitching. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 32, Issue. 9, p. 1259.

    Zafirovski, Milan Z. 2000. Spencer is dead, long live Spencer: individualism, holism, and the problem of norms*. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 553.

    Moon , Bruce 1999. Editor’s introduction and situating the appraisal of rationality. Journal of Management History, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Mackenzie, Craig 1997. Where are the motives? A problem with evidence in the work of Richard Thaler. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 123.


Rationality and social norms


One of the most persisting cleavages in the social sciences is the opposition between two lines of thought conveniently associated with Adam Smith and Émile Durkheim, between homo economicus and homo sociologicus. Of these, the former is supposed to be guided by instrumental rationality, while the behavior of the latter is dictated by social norms. The former is ‘pulled’ by the prospect of future rewards, whereas the latter is ‘pushed’ from behind by quasi-inertial forces (Gambetta 1987). The former adapts to changing circumstances, always on the lookout for improvements. The latter is insensitive to circumstances, adhering to the prescribed behavior even if new and apparently better options become available. The former is easily caricatured as a self-contained, asocial atom, and the latter as the mindless plaything of social forces. In this paper I characterize this contrast more fully, and discuss attempts to reduce norm-oriented action to some type of optimizing behavior.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *