Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-7jw6s Total loading time: 0.325 Render date: 2022-12-06T20:33:35.685Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Similarity vs. homogeneity: contextual effects in explaining trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Perola Öberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sverige
Sven Oskarsson
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sverige
Torsten Svensson
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sverige

Abstract

Diversity has powerful advantages, but may also generate internal tensions and low interpersonal trust. Despite extensive attention to these questions, the relationship between diversity and trust is often misunderstood and findings methodologically flawed. In this article, we specify two different mechanisms and adherent hypotheses. An individual might base her decision to trust on her perceived social similarity in relation to others in the community, that is, a similarity hypothesis. However, in a homogenous context, she might expect trustworthy behavior irrespective of her own social position due to signals of low degrees of social conflict and dense social networks, that is, a homogeneity hypothesis. Prior research has pinpointed only one of these mechanisms. The homogeneity hypothesis has not been explicated, and when the intention has been to test the similarity hypothesis, the homogeneity hypothesis has unintentionally been tested instead. The results are straightforward. While the homogeneity hypothesis is strongly supported, the findings speak against the similarity hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alba, R. Nee, V. (2003), Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. La Ferrara, E. (2002), ‘Who trusts others?’, Journal of Public Economics 85: 207234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, R. (2007), ‘Ethnic residential segregation and integration processes in Sweden’, in K. Schönwälder (ed.), Residential Segregation and the Integration of Immigrants. WZB (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH), Discussion Paper Nr. SP IV 2007-602, pp. 6190.Google Scholar
Arai, K., Oskarsson, S., Öberg, P., Svensson, T., Yamauchi, I. Hirano, S. (2005), ‘The structure and determinants of trust: the cases of Japan and Sweden’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 46: 183204.Google Scholar
Becker, L.C. (1996), ‘Trust as noncognitive security about motives’, Ethics 107: 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Books, J. Prysby, C. (1991), Political Behaviour and the Local Context, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (1998), ‘Communal and Exchange Trust Norms: Their Value Base and Relevance to Institutional Trust’, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds), Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 4674.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1994), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, K., Hardin, R. Levi, M. (2005), Cooperation without Trust?, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Delhey, J. Newton, K. (2003), ‘Who trusts?’, European Studies 5: 93137.Google Scholar
Delhey, J. Newton, K. (2005), ‘Predicting cross-national levels of social trust’, European Sociological Review 21: 311327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1999), ‘Review article on trust and governance’, Contemporary Sociology 28: 731732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. Torgler, B. (2006), ‘The effect of relative income position on social capital’, Economics Bulletin 26: 120.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (1988), ‘Mafia: the price of distrust’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 158175.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (2005), ‘The impact of social structure on economic outcomes’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsson, M. Jordahl, H. (2008), ‘Inequality and trust in Sweden’, Journal of Public Economics 92: 348365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1993), ‘The street-level epistemology of trust’, Politics and Society 21: 505529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1998), ‘Trust in government’, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds), Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 927.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2002), Trust and Trustworthiness, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hero, R. (2004), ‘Social capital and racial inequality in America’, Perspectives on Politics 1: 113122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, M. (2007), ‘Social capital and diversity generalized trust, social cohesion and regimes of diversity’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 40: 709732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Sprague, J. (1993), ‘Citizens, contexts, and politics’, in A. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, Washington: The American Political Science Association, pp. 291304.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Shively, P. Stein, R. (2002), ‘Contextual data and the study of elections and voting behavior’, Electoral Studies 21: 219233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S. Keefer, P. (1997), ‘Does social capital have an economic payoff?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 12511288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, S., Rothstein, B. (2007), ‘Minorities and Mistrust’. Conference Paper, ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, May 7–12, 2007, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Leigh, A. (2006), ‘Does Equality Lead to Fraternity?’, Australian National University CEPR Discussion Paper 513, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Letki, N. (2008), ‘Does diversity erode social cohesion?’, Political Studies 56: 99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (1991), ‘Are there limits to rationality’, Archives Européennes de Sociologie 32: 130141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (2003), ‘A state of trust’, in V. Braithwaite and M.A. Levi (eds), Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 77101.Google Scholar
March, J. Olsen, J. (2006), ‘The logic of appropriateness’, in M. Moran, M. Rein and R. Goodin (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 689708.Google Scholar
Marschall, M. Stolle, D. (2004), ‘Race and the city’, Political Behavior 26: 125153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. Kramer, R. (2001), ‘Trust as a form of shallow morality’, in K. Cook (ed.), Trust in Society, New York: Russell Sage, pp. 89118.Google Scholar
Miller, A. Mitamura, T. (2003), ‘Are surveys on trust trustworthy?’, Social Psychology Quarterly 66: 6270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nannestad, P. (2008), ‘What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything?’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 413436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, K. (1999), ‘Social capital and democracy’, in J. Van Deth et al. (eds), Social Capital and European Democracy, London: Routledge, pp. 324.Google Scholar
Newton, K. (2001), ‘Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy’, International Political Science Review 22: 201214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, K. (2007), ‘Social and political trust’, in R. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 342361.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öberg, P. Svensson, T. (2009), ‘Does power drive out trust?’, Political Studies 58: 143166.Google Scholar
Oliver, E. Mendelberg, T. (2000), ‘Reconsidering the environmental determinants of white racial attitudes’, American Journal of Political Science 44: 574589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oskarsson, S., Öberg, P. Svensson, T. (2009a), ‘Making capitalism work’, Economic and Industrial Democracy 30: 294320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oskarsson, S., Svensson, T. Öberg, P. (2009b), ‘Power, trust, and institutional constraints’, Rationality & Society 21: 171195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000), ‘Collective action and the evolution of social norms’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palme, J. (2006), ‘Income distribution in Sweden’, The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy 5: 1626.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work, Princeton: Princeton Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone, New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. (2007), ‘E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century’, Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 137174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. (2001), ‘The universal welfare state as a social dilemma’, Rationality and Society 13: 213233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. Uslaner, E. (2005), ‘All for all’, World Politics 58: 4172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. (1980), ‘Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility’, American Psychologist 35: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. Bosker, R. (1999), Multilevel Analysis, London: Sage.Google ScholarPubMed
Soroka, S., Helliwell, J. Johnston, R. (2006), ‘Measuring and modelling interpersonal trust’, in F. Kay and R. Johnston (eds), Social Capital, Diversity, and the Welfare State, Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 279303.Google Scholar
Statistics Sweden. ‘Befolkningsstatistik i sammandrag 1960–2008’. Retrieved 2 September 2009 from http://www.scb.se/Pages/TableAndChart____26040.aspxGoogle Scholar
Stolle, D. (2007), ‘Social capital’, in R.J. Dalton and H-D. Klingemann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 655674.Google Scholar
Stolle, D., Soroka, S. Johnston, R. (2008), ‘When does diversity erode trust?’, Political Studies 56: 5775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömblad, P. (2003), Politik på stadens skugga, Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Svensson, T. Öberg, P. (2005), How are coordinated market economies coordinated?, West European Politics 28(5): 10751100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. (1998), ‘Trust and democratic governance’, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds), Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 269294.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, E. (2002), ‘Trust, distrust, and in between’, in R. Hardin (ed.), Distrust, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 6082.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. (2002), The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, P.F. (1999), ‘The origins of social capital’, in J. Van Deth et al. (eds), Social Capital and European Democracy, London: Routledge, pp. 2544.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2001), ‘In whom do we trust’, The Academy of Management Review 26: 377396.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1993), ‘Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization’, Journal of Law and Economics 36: 453486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, T. Yamagishi, M. (1994), ‘Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan’, Motivation and Emotion 18: 129166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zak, P. Knack, S. (2001), ‘Trust and growth’, The Economic Journal 111: 295321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Similarity vs. homogeneity: contextual effects in explaining trust
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Similarity vs. homogeneity: contextual effects in explaining trust
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Similarity vs. homogeneity: contextual effects in explaining trust
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *