Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands

  • Bruno Castanho Silva (a1)

Radical parties have been found to succeed under conditions of mass polarization. It is argued that their message resonates better with voters at the extremes of an ideological spectrum. This paper investigates if the reverse also holds, meaning that radical parties may contribute to the polarization of the public. I test this claim in the Netherlands, a country that has experienced the rise of populist radical right parties since 2002, using a synthetic control model built with a pool of comparable countries and Eurobarometer survey data. Results show that, after the rise of Pim Fortuyn and Geert Wilders, the level of polarization among the Dutch public increased more than it otherwise would have. These findings contribute to understanding the connection between elite- and mass-level polarization, and the consequences of populist radical right parties’ emergence in Western Europe.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Abadie and J. Gardeazabal (2003), ‘The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque country’, The American Economic Review 93(1): 113132.

A. Abadie , A. Diamond and J. Hainmueller (2010), ‘Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490): 493505.

A. Abadie , A. Diamond and J. Hainmueller (2011), ‘Synth: an R package for synthetic control methods in comparative case studies’, Journal of Statistical Software 42(13): 117.

A. Abadie , A. Diamond and J. Hainmueller (2015), ‘Comparative politics and the synthetic control method’, American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 495–510.

A.I. Abramowitz and K. L. Saunders (2008), ‘Is polarization a myth?’, The Journal of Politics 70(2): 542555.

J. Adams , C.E. De Vries and D. Leiter (2012a), ‘Subconstituency reactions to elite depolarization in the Netherlands: an analysis of the Dutch public’s policy beliefs and partisan loyalties, 1986–98’, British Journal of Political Science 42: 81105.

J. Adams , J. Green and C. Milazzo (2012b), ‘Who moves? Elite and mass-level depolarization in Britain, 1987–2001’, Electoral Studies 31(4): 643655.

T. Akkerman (2005), ‘Anti-immigration parties and the defence of liberal values: the exceptional case of the List Pim Fortuyn’, Journal of Political Ideologies 10(3): 337354.

T. Akkerman and S. de Lange (2012), ‘Radical right parties in office: incumbency records and the electoral costs of governing’, Government and Opposition 47(4): 574596.

D. Albertazzi and S. Mueller (2013), ‘Populism and liberal democracy: populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland’, Government and Opposition 48(3): 343371.

A. Alesina , A. Devleeschauwer , W. Easterly , S. Kurlat and R. Wacziarg (2003), ‘Fractionalization’, Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155194.

J.T. Andrews and J. Money (2009), ‘The spatial structure of party competition: party dispersion within a finite policy space’, British Journal of Political Science 39(4): 805824.

K. Arzheimer (2009), ‘Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002’, American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 259275.

T. Bale (2003), ‘Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems’, West European Politics 26(3): 6790.

T. Brader , J.A. Tucker and D. Duell (2013), ‘Which parties can lead opinion? Experimental evidence on partisan cue taking in multiparty democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 46(11): 14851517.

F.G. Castles and P. Mair (1984), ‘Left-right political scales: some ‘expertâ’ judgements’, European Journal of Political Research 12(1): 7388.

R.J. Dalton (2008), ‘The quantity and the quality of party systems: party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences’, Comparative Political Studies 41(7): 899920.

C. de Vries , A. Hakhverdian and B. Lancee (2013), ‘The dynamics of Voters’ left/right identification: the role of economic and cultural attitudes’, Political Science Research and Methods 1(2): 223238.

P. DiMaggio , J. Evans and B. Bryson (1996), ‘Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized’, American Journal of Sociology 102(3): 690755.

D.J. Downey and M.L. Huffman (2001), ‘Attitudinal polarization and trimodal distributions: measurement problems and theoretical implications’, Social Science Quarterly 82(3): 494505.

J.N. Druckman , E. Peterson and R. Slothuus (2013), ‘How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation’, American Political Science Review 107(1): 5779.

J.-M. Esteban and D. Ray (1994), ‘On the measurement of polarization’, Econometrica 62(4): 819851.

L. Ezrow , J. Homola and M. Tavits (2014a), ‘When extremism pays: policy positions, voter certainty, and party support in postcommunist Europe’, The Journal of Politics 76(2): 535547.

L. Ezrow , M. Tavits and J. Homola (2014b), ‘Voter polarization, strength of partisanship, and support for extremist parties’, Comparative Political Studies 47(11): 15581583.

J.C. Garand (2010), ‘Income inequality, party polarization, and roll-call voting in the U.S. senate’, The Journal of Politics 72(4): 11091128.

J. Huber and R. Inglehart (1995), ‘Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies’, Party Politics 1: 73111.

G.C. Jacobson (2010), ‘Perception, memory, and partisan polarization on the Iraq war’, Political Science Quarterly 125(1): 3156.

C. Jensen and J.P.F. Thomsen (2011), ‘Can party competition amplify mass ideological polarization over public policy? The case of ethnic exclusionism in Denmark and Sweden’, Party Politics 19(5): 821840.

R. Koopmans and J. Muis (2009), ‘The rise of right-wing populist Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands: a discursive opportunity approach’, European Journal of Political Research 48(5): 642664.

H.G. Lavine , C.D. Johnston and M.R. Steenbergen (2012), The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.

M.S. Levendusky (2009), The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democratic and Conservatives Became Republicans, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

A. Lupia (1994), ‘Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections’, American Political Science Review 88(1): 6376.

N. Lupu (2015), ‘Party polarization and mass partisanship: a comparative perspective’, Political Behavior 37: 331356.

S. Merrill III and J. Adams (2002), ‘Centrifugal incentives in multi-candidate elections’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(3): 275300.

C. Mudde (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

C. Mudde (2013), ‘Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what?’, European Journal of Political Research 52(1): 119.

C. Mudde (2014), ‘Fighting the system? Populist radical right parties and party system change’, Party Politics 20(2): 217226.

S.P. Nicholson (2012), ‘Polarizing cues’, American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 5266.

H. Pellikaan , T. Van der Meer and S. de Lange (2003), ‘The road from a depoliticized to a centrifugal democracy’, Acta Politica 38(1): 2349.

H. Pellikaan , S. de Lange and T. Van der Meer (2007), ‘Fortuyn’s legacy: party system change in the Netherlands’, Comparative European Politics 5: 282302.

P. Pennings and H. Keman (2003), ‘The Dutch parliamentary elections in 2002 and 2003: the rise and decline of the Fortuyn movement’, Acta Politica 38(1): 5168.

M. Rooduijn , S.L. de Lange and W. Van der Brug (2014), ‘A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe’, Party Politics 20(4): 563575.

M. Rooduijn , W. van der Brug and S.L. de Lange (2016), ‘Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent’, Electoral Studies 43: 3240.

G. Schumacher and M. Rooduijn (2013), ‘Sympathy for the devil? Voting for populists in the 2006 and 2010 Dutch general elections’, Electoral Studies 32(1): 124133.

R.J. Sørensen (2014), ‘Political competition, party polarization, and government performance’, Public Choice 161(3): 427450.

W. Van der Brug (2003), ‘How the LPF fuelled discontent: empirical tests of explanations of LPF support’, Acta Politica 38: 89106.

C. Van Der Eijk (2001), ‘Measuring agreement in ordered rating scales’, Quality and Quantity 35(3): 325341.

J.J.M. Van Holsteyn and G.A. Irwin (2003), ‘Never a dull moment: Pim Fortuyn and the Dutch parliamentary election of 2002’, West European Politics 26(2): 4166.

K. Van Kersbergen and A. Krouwel (2008), ‘A double-edged sword! The Dutch centre-right and the ‘foreigners issue’’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(3): 398414.

J. Van Spanje (2010), ‘Contagious parties: anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary western Europe’, Party Politics 16(5): 563586.

A. Vatter (2016), ‘Switzerland on the road from a consociational to a centrifugal democracy?’, Swiss Political Science Review 22(1): 5974.

K. Vossen (2010), ‘Populism in the Netherlands after Fortuyn: Rita Verdonk and Geert Wilders compared’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 11(1): 2238.

K. Vossen (2011), ‘Classifying wilders: the ideological development of Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom’, Politics 31(3): 179189.

A. Zaslove (2004), ‘The dark side of European politics: unmasking the radical right’, Journal of European Integration 26(1): 6181.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 40
Total number of PDF views: 285 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1430 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st March 2017 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.