Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ideational foundations of coercion: political culture and policies towards North Korea

  • Michal Onderco (a1) and Wolfgang Wagner (a2)
Abstract

The notion that states’ foreign and security policies are not exclusively driven by material interests is now firmly established. Whose ideas matter and in what way, however, has remained subject to debate. We advance this debate by studying the crisis diplomacy of liberal democracies towards North Korea during four crises around the country’s violation of international norms between 1993 and 2009. Although liberal democracies share a common perception of North Korea’s nuclear programme as a threat to international peace and security, they differ widely in either confronting or accommodating North Korea. We examine the explanatory power of two ideational driving forces behind the foreign policy of liberal democracies: the ideological orientation of the government, on the one hand, and a country’s political culture, on the other. Our analysis of 22 liberal democracies demonstrates that different domestic cultures of dealing with norm violations have a significant impact on crisis diplomacy: countries with punitive domestic cultures tend to adopt confrontational policies towards international norm violators; while left governments are not more accommodationist than right governments. Ideational differences across states are thus more pronounced than those within states.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: michal.onderco@eui.eu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Arena and G. Palmer (2009), ‘Politics or the economy? Domestic correlates of dispute involvement in developed democracies’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 955975.

Z. Bauman (2000), ‘Social issues of law and order’, British Journal of Criminology 40: 205221.

T. Beck , G. Clarke , A. Groff , P. Keefer and P. Walsh (2001), ‘New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions’, The World Bank Economic Review 15: 165176.

M. Breuning (1995), ‘Words and deeds: foreign assistance rhetoric and policy behavior in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom’, International Studies Quarterly 39: 235254.

B. Bridges (2003), ‘Western Europe and North Korea: new openings and old problems’, East Asia 20: 86107.

J. Clare (2010), ‘Ideological fractionalization and the international conflict behavior of parliamentary democracies1’, International Studies Quarterly 54: 965987.

R. Dorient (2002), ‘Un septennat de politique asiatique: quel bilan pour la France?Politique étrangère 67: 173188.

M.M. Feeley and J. Simon (1992), ‘The new penology. Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications’, Criminology 30: 449474.

E. Gartzke (2000), ‘Preferences and the democratic peace’, International Studies Quarterly 44: 191212.

A. Geis , H. Müller and N. Schörnig (eds) (2013), The Militant Face of Democracy: Liberal Forces for Good, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M.O. Hosli , M. Mattila and M. Uriot (2011), ‘Voting in the council of the European Union after the 2004 enlargement: a comparison of old and new member states’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49: 12491270.

M. Jachtenfuchs , T. Diez and S. Jung (1998), ‘Which Europe?’, European Journal of International Relations 4: 409445.

R.E. Kelly (2012), ‘Korea–European Union relations: beyond the FTA?International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 12: 101132.

H.-D. Klingemann , R.I. Hofferbert and I. Budge (1994), Parties, Policies, and Democracy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

M.T. Koch (2009), ‘Governments, partisanship, and foreign policy: the case of dispute duration’, Journal of Peace Research 46: 799817.

A. Lake (1994), ‘Confronting backlash states’, Foreign Affairs 73: 4555.

T. Lappi-Seppälä (2011), ‘Explaining imprisonment in Europe’, European Journal of Criminology 8: 303328.

P. Liberman (2006), ‘An eye for an eye: public support for war against evildoers’, International Organization 60: 687722.

P Liberman (2007), ‘Punitiveness and U.S. elite support for the 1991 Persian Gulf War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51: 332.

P Liberman (2013), ‘Retributive support for international punishment and torture’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 57: 285306.

H.W. Maull (1990), ‘Germany and Japan: the new civilian powers’, Foreign Affairs 69: 91106.

P.A. Mello (2014), Democratic Participation in Armed Conflict: Military Involvement in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

M. Onderco and W. Wagner (2012), ‘Of hawks and doves. Mapping policies towards Iran and North Korea’, The Nonproliferation Review 19: 177195.

G. Palmer , T. London and P. Regan (2004), ‘What’s stopping you? The sources of political constraints on international conflict behavior in parliamentary democracies’, International Interactions 30: 124.

B.C. Rathbun (2007), ‘Hierarchy and community at home and abroad: evidence of a common structure of domestic and foreign policy beliefs in American elites’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51: 379407.

L Ray (1999), ‘Measuring party orientations towards European integration: results from an expert survey’, European Journal of Political Research 36: 283306.

D Reiter (1999), ‘Military strategy and the outbreak of international conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 43: 366387.

T. Risse , D. Engelmann-Martin , H.-J. Knope and K. Roscher (1999), ‘To Euro or not to Euro?European Journal of International Relations 5: 147187.

J. Schuster and H. Maier (2006), ‘The rift: explaining Europe’s divergent Iraq policies in the run-up of the American-led war on Iraq’, Foreign Policy Analysis 2: 223244.

K. Seki and L.K. Williams (2014), ‘Updating the party government data set’, Electoral Studies 34: 270279.

L.J. Skitka and P.E. Tetlock (1993), ‘Providing public assistance: cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 12051223.

E. Voeten (2004), ‘Resisting the lonely superpower: responses of states in the United Nations to U.S. dominance’, The Journal of Politics 66: 729754.

W. Wagner and M. Onderco (2014), ‘Accommodation or confrontation? Explaining differences in policies towards Iran’, International Studies Quarterly 58: 717728.

K.N. Waltz (1993), ‘The emerging structure of international politics’, International Security 18: 4479.

A. Wiener (2007), ‘The dual quality of norms and governance beyond the state: sociological and normative approaches to “interaction”’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10: 4769.

M. Barnett (1999), ‘Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo’, European Journal of International Relations 5: 136.

T. Farrell (2002), ‘Constructivist security studies: portrait of a research program’, International Studies Review 4: 4972.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Onderco and Wagner supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 36 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 136 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.