Adams, J. (1999), ‘Policy divergence in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting’, Public Choice
Adams, J. and Somer-Topçu, Z. (2009), ‘Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies’, British Journal of Political Science
Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2006), ‘Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976--1998’, American Journal of Political Science
Andersson, S., Torbjörn, B. and Svante, E. (2014), ‘The European Representative Democracy Data Archive, Release 3’. Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (In2007-0149:1-E). Retrieved 9 February 2016 from www.erdda.se
Bäck, H., Debus, M. and Dumont, P. (2011), ‘Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies’, European Journal of Political Research
Bevan, S. and Greene, Z. (2016), ‘Looking for the party? The effects of partisan change on issue attention in UK acts of parliament’, European Political Science Review
Bevan, S., John, P. and Jennings, W. (2011), ‘Keeping party programmes on track: the transmission of the policy agendas of executive speeches to legislative outputs in the United Kingdom’, European Political Science Review
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. and Jones, B.S. (2004), Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boydstun, A.E., Bevan, D.S. and Thomas, H.F. (2014), ‘The importance of attention diversity and how to measure it’, Policy Studies Journal
Carey, J.M. (2008),
Legislative Voting and Accountability
, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dandoy, R. (2014), ‘The impact of government participation and prospects on party policy preferences in Belgium’, Government and Opposition
De Swaan, A. (1973), Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments After 1918, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
De Vries, K. and Hobolt, S. (2012), ‘When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics
Diermeier, D. and Stevenson, R.T. (1999), ‘Cabinet survival and competing risks’, American Journal of Political Science
Döring, H. (2003), ‘Party discipline and government imposition of restrictive rules’, The Journal of Legislative Studies
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
Druckman, J.N. (2008), ‘Approaches to studying parliamentary coalitions’, Political Research Quarterly
Druckman, J.N. and Thies, M.F. (2002), ‘The importance of concurrence: the impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration’, American Journal of Political Science
Eichorst, J. (2014), ‘Explaining variation in coalition agreements: the electoral and policy motivations for drafting agreements’,
European Journal of Political Research
Elgie, R. (2011), Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types and Democratic Performance, Oxford: Oxford University press.
Ezrow, L. (2007), ‘The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters’, Journal of Politics
Ezrow, L., De Vries, C., Steenbergen, M. and Edwards, E. (2011), ‘Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?’, Party Politics
Falcó-Gimeno, A. (2014), ‘The use of control mechanisms in coalition governments the role of preference tangentiality and repeated interactions’, Party Politics
Franchino, F. and Høyland, B. (2009), ‘Legislative involvement in parliamentary systems: opportunities, conflict, and institutional constraints’, American Political Science Review
Golder, S. (2006), The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Green, J. (2011), ‘A test of core vote theories: the British Conservatives, 1997--2005’, The British Journal of Political Science
Green, J. and Hobolt, S. (2008), ‘Owning the issue agenda: party strategies and vote choices in British elections’, Electoral Studies
Greene, Z. (2015), ‘Competing on the issues: how experience in government and economic conditions influence the scope of parties’ policy messages’, Party Politics
1–14, doi: 10.1177/1354068814567026.
Greene, Z. and Jensen, C. (2014), ‘Manifestos, salience and junior ministerial appointments’, Party Politics
1–11, doi: 1354068814549336.
Green-Pedersen, C. and Mortensen, P.B. (2010), ‘Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting’, European Journal of Political Research
Hibbs, D.A. (1977), ‘Political parties and macroeconomic policy’, The American Political Science Review
Huber, J.D. (1996), Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ibenskas, R. (2015), ‘Understanding pre-electoral coalitions in Central and Eastern Europe’, British Journal of Political Science, 1–19, doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000544. FirstView.
Jennings, W., Bevan, S., Timmermans, A., Breeman, G., Brouard, S., Chaques-Bonafont, L., Green-Pedersen, C., John, P., Mortensen, P. and Palau, A. (2011), ‘Effects of the core functions of government on the diversity of executive agendas’, Comparative Political Studies
John, P. and Jennings, W. (2010), ‘Punctuations and turning points in British politics: the policy agenda of the Queen’s speech’, British Journal of Political Science
Kam, C.J. (2009), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, G.J.E.A., Burns, N.E. and Laver, M. (1990), ‘A unified model of cabinet dissolution in parliamentary democracies’, American Political Science Review
Kirchheimer, O. (1990), ‘The catch-all party’, in P. Mair (ed.), The West European Party System, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 50–60.
Laver, M. (2003), ‘Government termination’, Annual Review of Political Science
Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1996), Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Licht, A.A. (2011), ‘Change comes with time: substantive interpretation of nonproportional hazards in event history analysis’, Political Analysis
Lipsmeyer, C.S. and Pierce, H.N. (2011), ‘The eyes that bind: junior ministers as oversight mechanisms in coalition governments’, Journal of Politics
Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S. and Laver, M. (2011), ‘Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts’, Legislative Studies Quarterly
Lupia, A. and Strøm, K. (1995), ‘Coalition termination and the strategic timing of parliamentary elections’, American Political Science Review
Maoz, Z. and Somer-Topçu, Z. (2010), ‘Political polarization and cabinet stability in multiparty systems: a social network analysis of European parliaments, 1945--98’, British Journal of Political Science
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2003), ‘Wasting time? The impact of ideology and size on delay in coalition formation’, British Journal of Political Science
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2005), ‘Coalition policymaking and legislative review’, The American Political Science Review
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2008), ‘Coalition government and political communication’, Political Research Quarterly
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2011), Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2014), ‘Parties and policymaking in multiparty governments: the legislative median, ministerial autonomy, and the coalition compromise’, American Journal of Political Science
McCombs, M. and Zhu, J.-H. (1995), ‘Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda trends from 1954 to 1994’, Public Opinion Quarterly
Meguid, B. (2005), ‘Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success’, American Political Science Review
Meguid, B. (2008), Party Competition Between Unequals, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, T.M. and Wagner, M. (2013), ‘Mainstream or niche? Vote-seeking incentives and the programmatic strategies of political parties’, Comparative Political Studies
Meyer, T.M. and Miller, B. (2015), ‘The niche party concept and its measurement’, Party Politics
Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds) (1999), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds) (2003),
Coalition Governments in Western Europe
, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyblade, B. (2004), ‘The ‘Effective’ Number of issue dimensions: a measure with application to West Europe’. In Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, p. 15–18.
Petrocik, John R. (1996), ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study’, American Journal of Political Science
Przeworski, A. and Sprague, J.D. (1986), Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rovny, J. (2012), ‘Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition’, European Union Politics
Rovny, J. (2013), ‘Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition’, European Political Science Review
Saalfeld, T. (2000), ‘Members of parliament and governments in Western Europe: agency relations and problems of oversight’, European Journal of Political Research
Saalfeld, T. (2008), ‘Institutions, chance, and choices’, in K. Strøm, W.C. Müller and T. Bergman (eds), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 327–368.
Saalfeld, T. (2013), ‘Economic performance, political institutions and cabinet durability in 28 European parliamentary democracies, 1945–2011’, in W.C. Müller and H.M. Narud (eds), Party Governance and Party Democracy, New York: Springer, pp. 51–79.
Schleiter, P. and Morgan-Jones, E. (2009), ‘Constitutional power and competing risks: monarchs, presidents, prime ministers, and the termination of east and west European Cabinets’, American Political Science Review
Shepsle, K.A. (1972), ‘The strategy of ambiguity: uncertainty and electoral competition’, American Political Science Review
Smith, A. (2003), ‘Election timing in majoritarian parliaments’, British Journal of Political Science
Somer-Topçu, Z. (2009), ‘Timely decisions: the effects of past national elections on party policy change’, Journal of Politics
Somer-Topçu, Z. (2015), ‘Everything to everyone: the electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe’, American Journal of Political Science
Soroka, S. and Wlezien, C. (2010), Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spoon, J.-J. (2011), Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Stoll, H. (2011), ‘Dimensionality and the number of parties in legislative elections’, Party Politics
Strøm, K. (1990), Minority Government and Majority Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strøm, K. and Swindle, S.M. (2002), ‘Strategic parliamentary dissolution’, American Political Science Review
Strøm, K., Müller, W.C. and Bergman, T. (2008), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thies, M. (2001), ‘Keeping tabs on partners: the logic of delegation in coalition governments’, American Journal of Political Science
Traynor, I. (2010), ‘Belgium’s five-party coalition government collapses: Bitter Linguistic and constitutional dispute over Brussels voting rights prompts administration’s fall after just five months’. The Guardian, April 26.
Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
van Roozendaal, P. (1997), ‘Government survival in western multi-party democracies’, European Journal of Political Research
Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S. and Werner, A. (2015), The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2015a, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Warwick, P. (1979), ‘The durability of coalition governments in parliamentary democracies’, Comparative Political Studies
Warwick, P. (1992), ‘Ideological diversity and government survival in Western European parliamentary democracies’, Comparative Political Studies
Warwick, P. (1994), Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.