Skip to main content

Gender and opinion–policy congruence in Europe

  • Stefanie Reher (a1)

Does public policy in Europe reflect women’s preferences equally well as men’s? This study compares the opinions of women and men with concrete policy on a set of 20 issues across a diverse range of policy areas in 31 European countries. It shows that the majorities of men and women frequently prefer the same policy. However, when they disagree, men’s preferences are more likely to be represented. Neither the proportion of women in parliament nor the left–right orientation of the government explains variation in women’s policy representation. Instead, a higher number of parliamentary parties increase the likelihood that policy reflects women’s views. This effect does not seem to be driven by left-libertarian politics or Green parties, even though women’s stronger support for ‘new politics’ issues is an important source of disagreement between men and women.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gender and opinion–policy congruence in Europe
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gender and opinion–policy congruence in Europe
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gender and opinion–policy congruence in Europe
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Hide All
Abou-Chadi, T. (2016), ‘Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts – how green and radical right parties differ in their impact’, British Journal of Political Science 46: 417436.
Atchison, A. (2015), ‘The impact of female cabinet ministers on a female-friendly labor environment’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 36(4): 388414.
Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., et al (2015), 1999-2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, Version 1.13 Available on Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
Bartels, L.M. (2008), Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
Baumgartner, F.R., C. Breunig, C. Green-Pedersen, B. D. Jones, P. B. Mortensen, M. Nuytemans and S. Walgrave (2009), ‘Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective’, American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 603620.
Bergh, J. (2007), ‘Explaining the gender gap: a cross‐national analysis of gender differences in voting’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 17(3): 235261.
Bernauer, J., Giger, N. and Rosset, J. (2015), ‘Mind the gap: do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?’, International Political Science Review 36(1): 7898.
Blais, A. and Bodet, M.A. (2006), ‘Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policy makers?’, Comparative Political Studies 39: 12431262.
Bormann, N.-C. and Golder, M. (2013), ‘Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011’, Electoral Studies 32: 360369.
Bratton, K.A. and Haynie, K.L. (1999), ‘Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: the effects of gender and race’, Journal of Politics 61(3): 658679.
Bratton, K.A. and Ray, L.P. (2002), ‘Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway’, American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 428437.
Brunner, E., Ross, S.L. and Washington, E. (2013), ‘Does less income mean less representation?’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2): 5376.
Campbell, R. (2004), ‘Gender, ideology and issue preference: is there such a thing as a political women’s interest in Britain?’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6: 2044.
Campbell, R., Childs, S. and Lovenduski, J. (2010), ‘Do women need women representatives?’, British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 171194.
Caul, M. (2001), ‘Political parties and candidate gender policies: a cross-national study’, Journal of Politics 63(4): 12141229.
Celis, K. (2006), ‘Substantive representation of women: the representation of women’s interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian parliament (1900–1979)’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28(2): 85114.
Childs, S. and Withey, J. (2006), ‘The substantive representation of women: the case of the reduction of VAT on sanitary products’, Parliamentary Affairs 59(1): 1023.
Childs, S. and Krook, M.L. (2009), ‘Analysing women’s substantive representation: from critical mass to critical actors’, Government and Opposition 44(2): 125145.
Converse, P.E. (1964), ‘The nature of belief systems in mass publics in D.E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 206266.
Cowell-Meyers, K. (2017), ‘The contagion effects of the feminist initiative in Sweden: agenda-setting, niche parties and mainstream parties’, Scandinavian Political Studies 40(4): 481493.
Cox, G.W. (1997), Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahlerup, D. (1988), ‘From a small to a large minority: women in Scandinavian politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies 4: 275298.
de Vries, C.E. and Hobolt, S.B. (2012), ‘When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics 13: 246268.
Dingler, S.C., Kroeber, C. and Fortin-Rittberger, J. (2018), Do parliaments underrepresent women’s policy preferences? Exploring gender equality in policy congruence in 21 European democracies. Journal of European Public Policy,
Dolezal, M., Eder, N., Kritzinger, S. and Zeglovits, E. (2013), ‘The structure of issue attitudes revisited: a dimensional analysis of Austrian voters and party elites’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23(4): 423443.
Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2016), ‘Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Development version’. Retrieved 25 August 2016 from
Enns, P.K. (2015), ‘Relative policy support and coincidental representation’, Perspectives on Politics 13(4): 10531064.
Esaiasson, P. and Holmberg, S. (1996), Representation From Above, Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Ezrow, L. and Xezonakis, G. (2011), ‘Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings’, Comparative Political Studies 44: 11521178.
Gallagher, M. (2014), Election indices dataset. Retrieved 11 May 2017 from Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php.
Gidengil, E., Blais, A., Nadeau, R. and Nevitte, N. (2003), ‘Women to the left? Gender differences in political beliefs and policy preferences, in M. Tremblay and L. Trimble (eds), Women and Electoral Politics in Canada, Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, pp. 140159.
Gilens, M. (2012), Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America, New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
Golder, M. (2010), ‘Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2000’, Electoral Studies 24: 103120.
Golder, M. and Stramski, J. (2010), ‘Ideological congruence and electoral institutions’, American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 90106.
Greene, Z. and O’Brien, D. (2016), ‘Diverse parties, diverse agendas? Female politicians and the parliamentary party’s role in platform formation’, European Journal of Political Research 55: 435453.
Griffin, J.D., Newman, B. and Wolbrecht, C. (2012), ‘A gender gap in policy representation in the U.S. Congress?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 37(1): 3566.
Hayes, B.C. (1997), ‘Gender, feminism and electoral behaviour in Britain’, Electoral Studies 16(2): 203216.
Höhmann, D. (2017), ‘Electoral systems and the legislative behavior of women’. Paper presented at the General Conference of the European Political Science Association, June 22–24, Milan.
Homola, J. (2017), Are parties equally responsive to women and men? British Journal of Political Science.
Htun, M., Lacalle, M. and Micozzi, J.P. (2013), ‘Does women’s presence change legislative behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007’, Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(1): 95125.
Htun, M. and Weldon, S.L. (2012), ‘The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005’, American Political Science Review 106(3): 548569.
IDEA (2017), Voter Turnout Database. Retrieved 11 May 2017 from
Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. (2000), ‘The developmental theory of the gender gap: women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective’, International Political Science Review 21(4): 441463.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) (2018), ‘Women in parliament’. Retrieved 26 April 2018 from
Keefer, P.E. (2015), Database of political institutions 2015. Retrieved 11 May 2017 from http://go.
Kittilson, M.C. (2008), ‘Representing women: the adoption of family leave in comparative perspective’, Journal of Politics 70(2): 323334.
Knutsen, O. (2001), ‘Social class, sector employment, and gender as party cleavages in the Scandinavian countries: a comparative longitudinal study, 1970–95’, Scandinavian Political Studies 24(4): 311350.
Krook, M.L. and Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2013), Electoral institutions, in G. Waylen, et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 554578.
Kuklinski, J.H. and Segura, G.M. (1995), ‘Endogeneity, exogeneity, time, and space in political representation: a review article’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(1): 321.
Lax, J.R. and Phillips, J.H. (2012), ‘The democratic deficit in the states’, American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 148166.
Mansbridge, J. (1999), ‘Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”’, Journal of Politics 61(3): 628657.
Marshall, M.G., T.R. Gurr and K. Jaggers (2016), Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual, Center for Systemic Peace.
Matland, R.E. and Studlar, D.T. (1996), ‘The contagion of women candidates in single-member district and proportional representation electoral systems: Canada and Norway’, Journal of Politics 58(3): 707733.
Matland, R.E. and Taylor, M.M. (1997), ‘Electoral system effects on women’s representation: theoretical arguments and evidence from Costa Rica’, Comparative Political Studies 30(2): 186210.
Mazur, A.G. (2002), Theorizing Feminist Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McAllister, I. and Studlar, D.T. (2002), ‘Electoral systems and women’s representation: a long‐term perspective’, Representation 39(1): 314.
Meguid, B.M. (2005), ‘Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success’, American Political Science Review 99(3): 347359.
Monroe, A.D. (1998), ‘Public opinion and public policy, 1980-1993’, Public Opinion Quarterly 62(1): 628.
Osborn, T.L. (2012), How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Page, B.I. and Shapiro, R.Y. (1983), ‘Effects of public opinion on policy’, American Political Science Review 77(1): 175190.
Peters, Y. and Ensink, S.J. (2015), ‘Differential responsiveness in Europe: the effects of preference difference and electoral participation’, West European Politics 38(3): 577600.
Phillips, A. (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pitkin, H.F. (1967), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Poggione, S. (2004), ‘Exploring gender differences in state legislators’ policy preferences’, Political Research Quarterly 57(2): 305314.
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L.M. and Sidanius, J. (1997), ‘The gender gap: differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation’, British Journal of Social Psychology 36: 4968.
Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L. and Reher, S. (2018a), ‘With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success’, Comparative Political Studies 51(2): 139164.
Rasmussen, A., Reher, S. and Toshkov, D. (2018b), The opinion-policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research.
Reher, S. (2015), ‘Explaining cross-national variation in the relationship between priority congruence and satisfaction with democracy’, European Journal of Political Research 54(1): 160181.
Sawer, M. (2012), ‘What makes the substantive representation of women possible in a Westminster parliament? The story of RU486 in Australia’, International Political Science Review 33(3): 320335.
Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. and Mishler, W. (2005), ‘An integrated model of women’s representation’, Journal of Politics 67(2): 407428.
Shapiro, R.Y. and Mahajan, H. (1986), ‘Gender differences in policy preferences: a summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s’, Public Opinion Quarterly 50(1): 4261.
Soroka, S.N. and Wlezien, C. (2008), ‘On the limits to inequality in representation’, PS: Political Science & Politics 41(2): 319327.
Soroka, S.N. and Wlezien, C. (2010), Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stetson, D.M.B. and Mazur, A.G. (eds) (1995), Comparative State Feminism, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stimson, J.A., Mackuen, M.B. and Erikson, R.S. (1995), ‘Dynamic representation’, American Political Science Review 89(3): 543565.
Swers, M.L. (1998), ‘Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(3): 435448.
Taylor-Robinson, M.M. and Heath, R.M. (2003), ‘Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues?’, Women & Politics 24(4): 77101.
Thomas, S. (1991), ‘The impact of women on state legislative policies’, Journal of Politics 53(4): 958976.
Thomas, S. (1994), How Women Legislate, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomassen, J. (2012), ‘The blind corner of political representation’, Representation 48(1): 1327.
Tremblay, M. (2003), ‘Women’s representational role in Australia and Canada: the impact of political context’, Australian Journal of Political Science 38(2): 215238.
Vega, A. and Firestone, J.M. (1995), ‘The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(2): 213222.
Verba, S. (2003), ‘Would the dream of political equality turn out to be a nightmare?’, Perspectives on Politics 1(4): 663680.
Wagner, M. (2012), ‘Defining and measuring niche parties’, Party Politics 18: 845864.
Wängnerud, L. (2000), ‘Testing the politics of presence: women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag’, Scandinavian Political Studies 23(1): 6791.
Wängnerud, L. (2015), The Principles of Gender-Sensitive Parliaments, New York: Routledge.
Wängnerud, L. and Sundell, A. (2012), ‘Do politics matter? Women in Swedish local elected assemblies 1970-2010 and gender equality in outcomes’, European Political Science Review 4(1): 97120.
Waylen, G. (2007), Engendering Transitions: Women’s Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weldon, S.L. (2002), ‘Beyond bodies: institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking’, Journal of Politics 64(4): 11531174.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Reher supplementary material
Reher supplementary material 1

 PDF (960 KB)
960 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed