Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity

  • Fritz W. Scharpf (a1)

To be at the same time effective and liberal, governments must normally be able to count on voluntary compliance – which, in turn, depends on the support of socially shared legitimacy beliefs. In Western constitutional democracies, such beliefs are derived from the distinct, but coexistent traditions of ‘republican’ and ‘liberal’ political philosophy. Judged by these criteria, the European Union – when considered by itself – appears as a thoroughly liberal polity which, however, lacks all republican credentials. But this view (which seems to structure the debates about the ‘European democratic deficit’) ignores the multilevel nature of the European polity, where the compliance of citizens is requested, and needs to be legitimated, by member states, whereas the Union appears as a ‘government of governments’, which is entirely dependent on the voluntary compliance of its member states. What matters primarily, therefore, is the compliance–legitimacy relationship between the Union and its member states – which, however, is normatively constrained by the basic compliance–legitimacy relationship between member governments and their constituents. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, member governments could, and should, be able to assume political responsibility for European policies in which they had a voice, and to justify them in ‘communicative discourses’ in the national public space. That is not necessarily so for ‘non-political’ policy choices imposed by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). By enforcing its ‘liberal’ programme of liberalization and deregulation, the ECJ may presently be undermining the ‘republican’ bases of member-state legitimacy. Where that is the case, open non-compliance is a present danger, and political controls of judicial legislation may be called for.

Corresponding author
Hide All
C. Anderson , A. Blais , S. Bowler , T. Donovan O. Listhaug (2005), Losers’s Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Argument: voting rights. Florida Law Review, 41, 443–490.

S. Bartolini (2005), Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Restructuring between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

J.M. Buchanan G. Tullock (1962), The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

R.A. Cichowski (2004), ‘Women’s rights, the European Court, and supranational constitutionalism’, Law & Society Review 38(3): 489512.

M. Ferrera (2005), The Boundaries of Welfare. European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Follesdal S. Hix (2006), ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533562.

S. Ganghof P. Genschel (2008a), ‘Taxation and democracy in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(1): 5877.

P.A. Hall D. Soskice (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Héritier D. Lehmkuhl (2008), ‘Introduction: the shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance’, Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 117.

B. Kohler-Koch B. Rittberger (2006), ‘Review article: The “Governance Turn” in EU studies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 2749.

G. Majone (1998), ‘Europe’s “democratic deficit”: the question of standards’, European Law Journal 4: 528.

D. Martinsen (2005), ‘The Europeanization of welfare. The domestic impact of Intra-European social security’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(5): 10271054.

D. Martinsen K. Vrangbaek (2008), ‘The Europeanization of health care governance. Implementing the market imperatives of Europe’, Public Administration 86(1): 169184.

E. Maskin J. Tirole (1999), ‘Unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts’, Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 83114.

Y. Mény Y. Surel (eds) (2002), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

R. Münch (2008b), ‘Constructing a European society by jurisdiction’, European Law Journal 14(5): 519541.

K. Nicolaïdis S.K. Schmidt (2007), ‘Mutual recognition “on trial”: the long road to services liberalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 14: 717734.

J. Pollak (2008), ‘Ist eine europäische Identität möglich? Warum wir lernen müssen, Zwiebeln zu lieben’, in C. Joerges, M. Mahlmann and U.K. Preuß (Hrsg.), Schmerzliche Erfahrungen der Vergangenheit’ und der Prozess der Konstitutionalisierung Europas, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 6380.

U.K. Preuss (1999), ‘National, supranational and international solidarity’, in K. Bayertz (ed.), Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, Vol. 5, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281292.

F.W. Scharpf (1988), ‘The joint decision trap. Lessons from German federalism and European integration’, Public Administration 66(3): 239278.

F.W. Scharpf (2001), ‘Notes toward a theory of multilevel governing in Europe’, Scandinavian Political Studies 24(1): 126.

F.W. Scharpf (2008), ‘Community, diversity and autonomy: the challenges of reforming German federalism’, German Politics 17(4), 501521.

V.A. Schmidt (2004), ‘The European Union: democratic legitimacy in a regional state’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42(4): 975999.

V.A. Schmidt (2006), Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

S.K. Schmidt (2007), ‘Mutual recognition as a new mode of governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 14: 667681.

A. Somek (2008), Individualism: An Essay on the Authority of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

C. Taylor (1992), The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

G. Tsebelis (2002), Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

A. Moravcsik (2002), ‘In defence of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 603624.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 482 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1164 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.