Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 59
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fossum, John Erik 2016. A Companion to European Union Law and International Law.


    Hurrelmann, Achim 2016. Empirical legitimation analysis in International Relations: how to learn from the insights – and avoid the mistakes – of research in EU studies. Contemporary Politics, p. 1.


    Kutay, Acar 2016. A Critical Transnational Public Sphere: Bringing Back Common Good and Social Ontology in Context. Globalizations, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 47.


    Maatsch, Aleksandra 2016. Drivers of political parties’ voting behaviour in European economic governance: the ultimate decline of the economic cleavage?. West European Politics, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 648.


    Hurrelmann, Achim 2015. Demoi-cratic citizenship in Europe: an impossible ideal?. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 19.


    Kostadinova, Petia 2015. Improving the Transparency and Accountability of EU Institutions: The Impact of the Office of the European Ombudsman. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 53, Issue. 5, p. 1077.


    Lord, Christopher 2015. Utopia or dystopia? Towards a normative analysis of differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 22, Issue. 6, p. 783.


    Piattoni, Simona 2015. Multi-Level Governance: The Missing Linkages.


    Schlenker, Andrea 2015. Supranational, Intergovernmental or Demoicratic Legitimacy? Citizens’ Evaluations of the EU. European Politics and Society, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 581.


    Woo, J.J. Ramesh, M. and Howlett, M. 2015. Legitimation capacity: System-level resources and political skills in public policy. Policy and Society, Vol. 34, Issue. 3-4, p. 271.


    Bellamy, R. and Kroger, S. 2014. Domesticating the Democratic Deficit? The Role of National Parliaments and Parties in the EU's System of Governance. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 67, Issue. 2, p. 437.


    Doyle, Natalie J. 2014. Democracy and Crisis.


    Miklin, Eric 2014. EU Politicisation and National Parliaments: Visibility of Choices and Better Aligned Ministers?. The Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 78.


    Occhipinti, John D 2014. Whither the withering democratic deficit? The impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 83.


    Risse, Thomas 2014. No Demos? Identities and Public Spheres in the Euro Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 52, Issue. 6, p. 1207.


    Schmidt, Susanne K. 2014. Judicial Europeanisation: The Case ofZambranoin Ireland. West European Politics, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 769.


    Wasserfallen, Fabio 2014. Political and Economic Integration in the EU: The Case of Failed Tax Harmonization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 52, Issue. 2, p. 420.


    Wihlborg, Elin 2014. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. p. 2148.

    Bellamy, Richard and Kröger, sandra 2013. Representation Deficits and Surpluses in EU Policy-making. Journal of European Integration, Vol. 35, Issue. 5, p. 477.


    Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione, Dario 2013. Three models of democracy, political community and representation in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 206.


    ×

Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity

  • Fritz W. Scharpf (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000204
  • Published online: 01 July 2009
Abstract

To be at the same time effective and liberal, governments must normally be able to count on voluntary compliance – which, in turn, depends on the support of socially shared legitimacy beliefs. In Western constitutional democracies, such beliefs are derived from the distinct, but coexistent traditions of ‘republican’ and ‘liberal’ political philosophy. Judged by these criteria, the European Union – when considered by itself – appears as a thoroughly liberal polity which, however, lacks all republican credentials. But this view (which seems to structure the debates about the ‘European democratic deficit’) ignores the multilevel nature of the European polity, where the compliance of citizens is requested, and needs to be legitimated, by member states, whereas the Union appears as a ‘government of governments’, which is entirely dependent on the voluntary compliance of its member states. What matters primarily, therefore, is the compliance–legitimacy relationship between the Union and its member states – which, however, is normatively constrained by the basic compliance–legitimacy relationship between member governments and their constituents. Given the high consensus requirements of European legislation, member governments could, and should, be able to assume political responsibility for European policies in which they had a voice, and to justify them in ‘communicative discourses’ in the national public space. That is not necessarily so for ‘non-political’ policy choices imposed by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). By enforcing its ‘liberal’ programme of liberalization and deregulation, the ECJ may presently be undermining the ‘republican’ bases of member-state legitimacy. Where that is the case, open non-compliance is a present danger, and political controls of judicial legislation may be called for.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: scharpf@mpifg.de
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Anderson , A. Blais , S. Bowler , T. Donovan O. Listhaug (2005), Losers’s Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Argument: voting rights. Florida Law Review, 41, 443–490.

S. Bartolini (2005), Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Restructuring between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

J.M. Buchanan G. Tullock (1962), The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

R.A. Cichowski (2004), ‘Women’s rights, the European Court, and supranational constitutionalism’, Law & Society Review 38(3): 489512.

M. Ferrera (2005), The Boundaries of Welfare. European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Follesdal S. Hix (2006), ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533562.

S. Ganghof P. Genschel (2008a), ‘Taxation and democracy in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(1): 5877.

P.A. Hall D. Soskice (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Héritier D. Lehmkuhl (2008), ‘Introduction: the shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance’, Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 117.

B. Kohler-Koch B. Rittberger (2006), ‘Review article: The “Governance Turn” in EU studies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 2749.

G. Majone (1998), ‘Europe’s “democratic deficit”: the question of standards’, European Law Journal 4: 528.

D. Martinsen (2005), ‘The Europeanization of welfare. The domestic impact of Intra-European social security’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(5): 10271054.

D. Martinsen K. Vrangbaek (2008), ‘The Europeanization of health care governance. Implementing the market imperatives of Europe’, Public Administration 86(1): 169184.

E. Maskin J. Tirole (1999), ‘Unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts’, Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 83114.

Y. Mény Y. Surel (eds) (2002), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

R. Münch (2008b), ‘Constructing a European society by jurisdiction’, European Law Journal 14(5): 519541.

K. Nicolaïdis S.K. Schmidt (2007), ‘Mutual recognition “on trial”: the long road to services liberalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 14: 717734.

J. Pollak (2008), ‘Ist eine europäische Identität möglich? Warum wir lernen müssen, Zwiebeln zu lieben’, in C. Joerges, M. Mahlmann and U.K. Preuß (Hrsg.), Schmerzliche Erfahrungen der Vergangenheit’ und der Prozess der Konstitutionalisierung Europas, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 6380.

U.K. Preuss (1999), ‘National, supranational and international solidarity’, in K. Bayertz (ed.), Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, Vol. 5, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281292.

F.W. Scharpf (1988), ‘The joint decision trap. Lessons from German federalism and European integration’, Public Administration 66(3): 239278.

F.W. Scharpf (2001), ‘Notes toward a theory of multilevel governing in Europe’, Scandinavian Political Studies 24(1): 126.

F.W. Scharpf (2008), ‘Community, diversity and autonomy: the challenges of reforming German federalism’, German Politics 17(4), 501521.

V.A. Schmidt (2004), ‘The European Union: democratic legitimacy in a regional state’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42(4): 975999.

V.A. Schmidt (2006), Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

S.K. Schmidt (2007), ‘Mutual recognition as a new mode of governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 14: 667681.

A. Somek (2008), Individualism: An Essay on the Authority of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

C. Taylor (1992), The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

G. Tsebelis (2002), Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

A. Moravcsik (2002), ‘In defence of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 603624.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: