Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:41:53.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Once they are seated: the impact of radical right parties’ political representation on attitudes of trust and solidarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2022

Mikkel Haderup Larsen Open the ORCID record for Mikkel Haderup Larsen [Opens in a new window]
Mikkel Haderup Larsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 16, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
*
E-mail: Mhl@soc.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A close reading of the literature on radical right parties (RRPs) suggests that these parties erode trust and solidarity in European democracies when they pit ‘the pure people’ against political and legal institutions, elites, and immigrants. I propose the conjecture that RRPs with seats in the national parliament have better conditions for spreading nativist and populist messages that may erode trust and solidarity between a society’s residents, between ethnic groups, and towards its political and legal institutions. To test this research question, I combine nine waves of European Social Survey data from 17 countries and data on national elections spanning the years 1999 to 2020. Two-way fixed effects models estimate that RRPs representation in the national parliament is associated with a reduction in public support for redistribution of ca. 18% of a standard deviation. Additionally, I demonstrate that this inverse relationship runs parallel to growing welfare chauvinistic beliefs and that it is stronger in countries with weak integration policies. Contra theoretical expectations, the radical rights’ political representation has not produced any change in societal levels of anti-immigration attitudes, institutional trust, or social trust. While the findings persist across a wide range of robustness checks and other model specifications, threats to identification in the form of non-parallel pre-trends and unobserved sources of confounding, means that one should be cautious in interpreting the findings in a causal manner.

Keywords

radical right partieselectionsattitudesfixed effectstrustregression discontinuity design
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 57 - 74
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Mads Meier Jæger, Merlin Schaeffer, Mathias Wullum Nielsen, Morten Wendler Jørgensen, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and ideas on earlier drafts of this article.

References

Abou-Chadi, T. and Finnigan, R. (2019), ‘Rights for same-sex couples and public attitudes toward gays and lesbians in Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 52(6): 868–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abou-Chadi, T. and Krause, W. (2020), ‘The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: a regression discontinuity approach’, British Journal of Political Science, 50(3): 829–847. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abts, K., Dalle Mulle, E., van Kessel, S. and Michel, E. (2021), ‘The welfare agenda of the populist radical right in Western Europe: combining welfare chauvinism, producerism and populism*’, Swiss Political Science Review 27(1): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, T. (2015), ‘Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: a fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades’, Party Politics 21(1): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, T. (2018), The Impact of Populist Radical-Right Parties on Immigration Policy Agendas: A Look at the Netherlands, Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199267669.001.0001/acprof9780199267668- CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, J. (2006), Immigration and the Legitimacy of the Scandinavian Welfare State: Some Preliminary Danish Findings. Akademiet for Migrationsstudier i Danmark, Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Andersen, J.G. and Bjørklund, T. (1990), ‘Structural changes and new cleavages: the progress parties in Denmark and Norway’, Acta Sociologica 33(3): 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939003300303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B.R.O. (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Arzheimer, K. and Carter, E. (2006), ‘Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success’, European Journal of Political Research 45(3): 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00304.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (1994), Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billiet, J. and Witte, H.D. (1995), ‘Attitudinal dispositions to vote for a ‘new’ extreme right-wing party: the case of ‘Vlaams Blok’, European Journal of Political Research 27(2): 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00635.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischof, D. and Wagner, M. (2019), ‘Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?’, American Journal of Political Science 63(4): 888–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishin, B.G., Hayes, T.J., Incantalupo, M.B. and Smith, C.A. (2016), ‘Opinion backlash and public attitudes: are political advances in gay rights counterproductive?’, American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, A. (2011), ‘Articulated antipathies: political influence on anti-immigrant attitudes’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology 52(6): 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715211428182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, A. and Hjerm, M. (2016), ‘In the wake of radical right electoral success: a cross-country comparative study of anti-immigration attitudes over time’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(11): 1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1131607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, D. and Finnigan, R. (2014), Does immigration undermine public support for social policy?’, American Sociological Review 79(1): 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413513022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, D.E. and Butler, D.M. (2017), ‘The causal effects of elite position-taking on voter attitudes: field experiments with elite communication’, American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G. and Fiorin, S. (2017), ‘From extreme to mainstream: how social norms unravel (No. w23415)’, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23415 Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1982), ‘Two strategies for the study of populism*’, Political Studies 30(4): 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00559.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Careja, R., Elmelund-Præstekær, C., Klitgaard, M.B. and Larsen, E.G. (2016), ‘Direct and indirect welfare chauvinism as party strategies: an analysis of the Danish people’s party’, Scandinavian Political Studies 39(4): 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, M., Dahl, G.B. and Rooth, D.-O. (2021), ‘Backlash in policy attitudes after the election of an extreme political party’, Journal of Public Economics 204, 104533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, T. and Boucher, A. (2009), ‘Social security and immigration: an agenda for future research’, Zeitschrift Fur Austlandisches Und Internationales Arbeits- Und Sozialrecht 23, 331–340.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, B. (2017), ‘Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands’, European Political Science Review 10, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000066 Google Scholar
de la Cuesta, B. and Imai, K. (2016), ‘Misunderstandings about the regression discontinuity design in the study of close elections’, Annual Review of Political Science 19(1): 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032015-010115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2014), ‘Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results’, Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinas, E., Riera, P. and Roussias, N. (2014), ‘Staying in the first league: parliamentary representation and the electoral success of small parties’, Political Science Research and Methods 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.38 Google Scholar
Dinesen, P.T. and Sønderskov, K.M. (2015), ‘Ethnic diversity and social trust: evidence from the micro-context’, American Sociological Review 80(3): 550–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415577989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, P.T., Schaeffer, M. and Sønderskov, K.M. (2020), ‘Ethnic diversity and social trust: a narrative and meta-analytical review’, Annual Review of Political Science 23(1): 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052918-020708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2021), ParlGov parties, elections, cabinets. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov). http://www.parlgov.org/ Google Scholar
Dunn, K.P. and Singh, S.P. (2011), ‘The surprising non-impact of radical right-wing populist party representation on public tolerance of minorities’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(3): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.588333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, T. (2012), Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eger, M.A. and Valdez, S. (2015), ‘Neo-nationalism in Western Europe’, European Sociological Review 31(1): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eger, M.A. and Valdez, S. (2019), ‘From radical right to neo-nationalist’, European Political Science 18(3): 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elff, M., Heisig, J.P., Schaeffer, M. and Shikano, S. (2021), ‘Multilevel analysis with few clusters: improving likelihood-based methods to provide unbiased estimates and accurate inference’, British Journal of Political Science 51(1): 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016), ‘A welfare state for whom? A group-based account of the Austrian freedom party’s social policy profile’, Swiss Political Science Review 22(3): 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Social Survey ERIC (ESS ERIC). (2020), European Social Survey (ESS), Cumulative Data Wizard. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS-CUMULATIVE CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EVS. (2021), EVS Trend File 1981–2017EVS Trend File 1981–2017 (2.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, M. (2016), ‘Far right parties in Europe’, Annual Review of Political Science 19(1): 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E. and Puranen, B. (2021), World Values Survey Time-Series (1981–2020) Cross-National Data-Set (2.0) [Data set]. World Values Survey Association. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, E., Kokkonen, A., Linde, J. and Dahlberg, S. (2021a), ‘A tough trade-off? The asymmetrical impact of populist radical right inclusion on satisfaction with democracy and government’, European Political Science Review 13(1): 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, E., Mendoza, P. and Rooduijn, M. (2021b), ‘Affective polarization and the populist radical right: creating the hating?’, Government and Opposition, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.31 Google Scholar
Hechter, M. (2015), Solidarity, Sociology of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (pp. 6–9). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32147-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinisch, R. (2003), ‘Success in opposition – failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office’, West European Politics 26(3): 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, S.B. and de Vries, C.E. (2015), ‘Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition’, Comparative Political Studies 48(9): 1159–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015575030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, M., Marien, S. and Pauwels, T. (2011), ‘Where do distrusting voters turn if there is no viable exit or voice option? The impact of political trust on electoral behaviour in the Belgian regional elections of June 2009 1’, Government and Opposition 46(2): 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01338.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignazi, P. (2003), From Ideologies to Parties. In Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293259.003.0003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R.F. and Norris, P. (2016), Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2818659). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Research Group. (1992), International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government II - ISSP 1990International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government II - ISSP 1990 (1.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.1950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Research Group. (1999), International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government III - ISSP 1996International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government III - ISSP 1996 (1.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.2900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Research Group. (2008). International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government IV - ISSP 2006International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government IV - ISSP 2006 (1.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Research Group. (2018), International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government V - ISSP 2016International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government V - ISSP 2016 (2.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2008), ‘What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe?: Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases’, Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M.M. (2006), ‘What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: self-interest or political ideology?: a longitudinal approach’, Acta Sociologica 49(3): 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306067718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowell, R. and Fitzgerald, R. (2010), ‘Measurement Equivalence in Comparative Surveys: The European Social Survey (ESS)—From Design to Implementation and Beyond’, in Harkness, J.A. (ed.), Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jowell, R., Fitzgerald, R., Eva, G. and Roberts, C. (2007), Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey, California: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keskinen, S. (2016), ‘From welfare nationalism to welfare chauvinism: economic rhetoric, the welfare state and changing asylum policies in Finland’, Critical Social Policy 36(3): 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315624170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and McGann, A.J. (1995), The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis (1. paperback ed., [Nachdr.]). Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, W., Cohen, D. and Abou-Chadi, T. (2022), ‘Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties’, Political Science Research and Methods, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2001), ‘Politics in the vernacular: nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship’, Philosophy 76(298): 625–629.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. and Banting, K. (2006), ‘Immigration, multiculturalism, and the welfare state’, Ethics & International Affairs 20(3): 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.S. and Lemieux, T. (2010), ‘Regression discontinuity designs in economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 48(2): 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.D. and Weigert, A. (1985), ‘Trust as a social reality’, Social Forces 63(4): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebst, L.S. (2019), ‘Exploring the sources of collective effervescence: a multilevel study’, Sociological Science 6: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, V. and Brüderl, J. (2021), ‘What you need to know when estimating impact functions with panel data for demographic research’, Comparative Population Studies 46. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulemann, B., Davidov, E. and Billiet, J. (2018), Modeling Multiple-country Repeated Cross-sections. A Societal Growth Curve Model for Studying the Effect of the Economic Crisis on Perceived Ethnic Threat. Methods, data, 25 Pages. https://doi.org/10.12758/MDA.2017.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004), ‘The populist zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2013), ‘Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what?’, European Journal of Political Research 52(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C.R. (2013), ‘Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America’, Government and Opposition 48(2): 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muis, J. and Immerzeel, T. (2017), ‘Causes and consequences of the rise of populist radical right parties and movements in Europe’, Current Sociology 65(6): 909–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117717294 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murakawa, N. (2002), ‘Elite cues and political decision-making’, Research in Micropolitics: Political Decision-Making, https://www.academia.edu/1793754/Elite_Cues_and_Political_Decision_Making Google Scholar
OECD. (2017), International Migration Outlook 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/international-migration-outlook-2017_migr_outlook-2017-en Google Scholar
OECD. (2018), International Migration Outlook 2018. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/international-migration-outlook-2018_migr_outlook-2018-en Google Scholar
OECD. (2021), Migration—Foreign-born population—OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/migration/foreign-born-population.htm Google Scholar
Raftery, A.E. (1995), ‘Bayesian model selection in social research’, Sociological Methodology 25: 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. and Jackson, E. (2001), ‘Is trust in others declining in America? An age–period–cohort analysis’, Social Science Research - SOC SCI RES 30: 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2000.0692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooduijn, M., van der Brug, W. and de Lange, S.L. (2016), ‘Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent’, Electoral Studies 43: 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röth, L., Afonso, A. and Spies, D.C. (2018), ‘The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies’, European Political Science Review 10(3): 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2008), ‘The state and social capital: an institutional theory of generalized trust’, Comparative Politics 40(4): 441–459. https://doi.org/10.2307/20434095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J. (2008), ‘What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions’, Governance 21(2): 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydgren, J. (2007), ‘The sociology of the radical right’, Annual Review of Sociology 33(1): 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Catran, A. and Spies, D. (2013), ‘Do parties “Playing the race card” undermine natives’ support for redistribution? Evidence from Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 47, 519–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solano, G. and Huddleston, T. (2020), Migrant Integration Policy Index 2020. CIDOB and MPG, www.mipex.eu.Google Scholar
Solt, F. (2020), ‘Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: the standardized world income inequality database’, Social Science Quarterly 101(3): 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S. and Wlezien, C. (2014), ‘Economic Crisis and Support for Redistribution in the United Kingdom’, in Bartels, L. and Bermeo, N. (Eds), Mass Politics in Tough Times (pp. 105–127). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199357505.003.0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague-Jones, J. (2011), ‘Extreme right-wing vote and support for multiculturalism in Europe’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 34, 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.512665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R.T. (2001), ‘The economy and policy mood: a fundamental dynamic of democratic politics?’, American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 620–633. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrente, D., Caïs, J. and Bolancé, C. (2019), ‘Economic crisis and social trust: reviewing the effects of economic polarisation on social and institutional confidence’, Social Science Information 58(4): 631–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018419891321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentim, V. (2021), ‘Parliamentary representation and the normalization of radical right support’, Comparative Political Studies, 0010414021997159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997159 Google Scholar
van der Brug, W. (2003), ‘How the LPF fuelled discontent: empirical tests of explanations of LPF support’, Acta Politica 38: 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Eijk, C. (2001), ‘Measuring agreement in ordered rating scales’, Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 35(3): 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meer, T. and Tolsma, J. (2014), ‘Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion’, Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winship, C. and Radbill, L. (1994), ‘Sampling weights and regression analysis’, Sociological Methods & Research 23(2): 230–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194023002004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015), ‘Populism and Politics: Transgressing Norms and Taboos’, in The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean (pp. 1–24). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2021a), GDP per capita (current US$) | Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2020&start=1960&view=chart Google Scholar
World Bank. (2021b), Population density (people per sq. Km of land area) | Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.DNST Google Scholar
World Bank. (2021c), Unemployment rate (as % of total labor force). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.NE.ZS?end=2020&start=2000 Google Scholar
Ziller, C. and Schübel, T. (2015), ‘“The Pure People” versus “the Corrupt Elite”? Political corruption, political trust and the success of radical right parties in Europe’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25(3): 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2014.1002792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Larsen supplementary material

Larsen supplementary material

Download Larsen supplementary material(File)
File 855.5 KB