Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Polecats, lions, and foxes: Coasian bargaining theory and attempts to legitimate the Union as a constrained form of political power

  • Christopher Lord (a1)

It is often supposed that the European Union (EU) can be legitimated as a Pareto-improving bargain between its member states. This paper explores the assumptions of social choice and political philosophy that lie behind that claim. Starting out from a republican view that a polity needs to satisfy standards of non-arbitrariness if it is to be legitimate, the paper begins by explaining why ‘Coasian’ assumptions of Pareto improvement are so important to arguments for the continued indirect legitimacy of the EU by its member states. The paper then identifies four reasons from the social choice literature why attempts to follow a ‘Coasian’ pathway to Pareto improvement may fail to deliver forms of collective choice at the European level that are non-arbitrary from the point of view of all member state governments: non-neutral starting points, preference drift, indivisibilities, and multiple equilibria. These problems are, in turn, used to identify difficulties that mechanisms of indirect legitimation are likely to encounter in meeting two key conditions political philosophers specify for the non-arbitrary exercise of political power, namely, political justice and ‘democratic self-legislation’.

Corresponding author
* E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Bartolini (2005), Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

D. Beetham C. Lord (1998), Legitimacy and the European Union, Harlow, Essex: Addison, Wesley, Longman.

R. Bellamy (2007), Political Constitutionalism, A Republican Defence of the Consitutionality of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. Buchanan G. Tullock (1962), The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

E.-O. Eriksen (2009), The Unfinished Democratization of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

G. Majone (2005), Dilemmas of European Integration. The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

M. Pollack (2003), The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency and Agenda-Setting in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

F. Scharpf (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

V. Schmidt (2006), Democracy in Europe, The EU and National Polities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 193 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.