Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:33:52.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-evaluating the post-communist success story: party elite loyalty, citizen mobilization and the erosion of Hungarian democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2015

Lise Esther Herman
Lise Esther Herman*
Affiliation:
European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, London
*
*E-mail: l.herman@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In light of the instability of several Central Eastern European democracies following their accession to the European Union, most dramatically embodied by the ‘constitutional revolution’ taking place in Hungary since April 2010, this paper offers a critical reading of the dominant, rational-institutionalist model of democratic consolidation. Drawing on the Hungarian case, it argues that the conditions set out by this model are insufficient for ensuring a democratic regime against erosion. On this basis, the paper considers additional elements to understand Fidesz’s reforms: the importance of deeper commitments to democracy among the leadership of mainstream parties, and the pivotal role of party strategies of citizen mobilization in the consolidation of young democracies. Drawing on these insights, the paper argues for approaching democratic consolidation as an agent-led process of cultural change, emphasizing the socializing role of mainstream parties’ strategies of mobilization in the emergence of a democratic political culture. The last section concludes with methodological and empirical considerations, outlining a three-fold agenda for future research.

Keywords

democratic consolidationcentral and eastern EuropeHungarypolitical parties
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 251 - 284
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ágh, A. (2012), ‘Report on democracy, freedom and liberty in central and Eastern Europe’, Foundation for European Progressive Studies. Retrieved 14 November 2012 from http://www.feps-europe.eu/en/news/316_report-on-democracy-freedom-and-liberty-in-central-and-eastern-europe Google Scholar
Alevizakos, V.W. (2008), Party strategies and the process of democratic consolidation in Southern and Central Europe. Ph.D. thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. (2001), ‘Institutions, path dependence, and democratic consolidation’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(3): 249–269.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. (2002a), ‘Institutionalized uncertainty, the rule of law, and the sources of democratic stability’, Comparative Political Studies 35(10): 1145–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G. (2002b), The sources of Democratic Consolidation, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2001), ‘Boxing and politics in slovakia: “Meciarism” – roots, theory, practice’, Democratization 8(2): 97–116.Google Scholar
Bánkuti, M., Dombos, T., Fleck, Z., Halmai, G., Rozgonyi, K., Majtényi, B. and Uit, R. (2012), “Amicus brief for the Venice Commission on the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law and the Key Cardinal Laws”. Retrieved 8 September 2014 from http://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/hungary/Amicus_Cardinal_Laws_final.pdf Google Scholar
Batory, A. (2008), The Politics of EU Accession: Ideology, Party Strategy and the European Question in Hungary, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Belzile, J. and Oberg, G. (2012), ‘Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design’, Qualitative Research 12(4): 459–472.Google Scholar
Benoit, K. (1996), ‘Hungary’s two‐vote’ electoral system’, Representation 33(4): 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2010), The State as Cultural Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biezen van, I., Poguntke, T. and Mair, P. (2012), ‘Going, going…gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 24–56.Google Scholar
Birch, S. (2001), ‘Electoral systems and party systems in Europe east and west’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 2(3): 355–377.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A. (2008), ‘Consolidation or second revolution? The emergence of the new right in Hungary’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24(2): 191–231.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A. (2013), “Access to Electoral Rights – Hungary”. European Union Democracy Observatory, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-ER 2013/19.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A. and Kriza, B. (2008), ‘The Hungarian semi-loyal parties and their impact on democratic consolidation’, In A. Blasko and D. Januauskiene (eds), Political Transformation and Changing Identities in Central and Eastern Europe, Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, pp. 215–242.Google Scholar
Bozóki, A.S. and Ishiyama, J.T. (eds) (2002), The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Brada, J.C. (1996), ‘Privatization is Transition – or is it?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(2): 67–86.Google Scholar
Buckley, N. (2012), ‘Fears grow for democracy in Romania’. Financial Times. Retrieved 2 February 2015 from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e3f4a24a-c901-11e1-a768-00144feabdc0.html Google Scholar
Bunce, V. (2003), ‘Rethinking recent democratization: lessons from the postcommunist experience’, World Politics 55: 167–192.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960), The American Voter, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999), ‘Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy’, Political Studies 47(1): 2–16.Google Scholar
Carothers, T. (2002), ‘The end of the transition paradigm’, Journal of Democracy 13(1): 5–21.Google Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F. and Mair, P. (2010), Two decades on: how institutionalized are the post-communist party systems? EUI Working Paper, 3.Google Scholar
Centre for fair political analysis. (2013), ‘The anatomy of the Hungarian right’. Retrieved 24 September 2014 from http://meltanyossag.hu/content/files/Anatomy_of_the_Hungarian_Right_120630.pdf Google Scholar
Chong, D. and Druckman, J. (2007), ‘Framing public opinion in competitive democracies’, American Political Science Review 101(101): 637–655.Google Scholar
Clark, T.D. (2002), Beyond Post-Communist Studies: Political Science and the New Democracies of Europe, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Cohen, S.J. (1999), Politics Without a Past: the Absence of History in Post-Communist Nationalism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2013), ‘Adopted Opinions for “Hungary”’. Retrieved 23 July 2014 from http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?country=17&year=all Google Scholar
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011), ‘Opinion of the Commissioner for Human Rights on Hungary’s media legislation in light of Council of Europe standards on freedom of the media, CommDH(2011)’. Retrieved 29 July 2014 from https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?Index=no&command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=1902982&SecMode=1&DocId=1702724&Usage=2 Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P. (2000), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dani, M. (2013), ‘The “partisan constitution” and the corrosion of european constitutional culture’, LSE “Europe in Question” Discussion Paper Series 68: 1–64.Google Scholar
Deegan-Krause, K. and Haughton, T. (2009), ‘Toward a more useful conceptualization of populism: types and degrees of populist appeals in the case of Slovakia’, Politics and Policy 37(4): 821–841.Google Scholar
Di Palma, G. (1990), To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L.J. (1994), ‘Toward democratic consolidation’, Journal of Democracy 5(3): 4–17.Google Scholar
Dimitrova-Grajzl, V. and Simon, E. (2010), ‘Political trust and historical legacy: the effect of varieties of socialism’, East European Politics & Societies 24(2): 206–228.Google Scholar
Disch, L. (2011), ‘Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation’, American Political Science Review 105(1): 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J.N. (2004), ‘Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 671–686.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. and Holmes, L. (2002), Post-Communist Democratization: Political Discourses Across Thirteen Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1975), ‘A re-assessment of the concept of political support’, British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 435–457.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z. (2005), ‘The role of agency in cleavage formation’, European Journal of Political Research 44(5): 697–720.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z. (2006), ‘Party politics in post-communist transition’, In R.S. Katz and W.J. Crotty (eds), Handbook of Party Politics, London: SAGE, pp. 228–238.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z. (2015), ‘Plebeians, citoyens and aristocrats or where is the bottom of bottom-up? The case of Hungary’, In H. Kriesi and T. Pappas (eds), Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 338–362.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z. and Linek, L. (2008), ‘Searching for the right organization’, Party Politics 14(4): 455–477.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2003), ‘Comprehensive monitoring report on Hungary’s preparations for membership’. Retrieved 7 September 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2003/cmr_hu_final_en.pdf Google Scholar
European Parliament. (2013), ‘Report on the Situation of Fundamental Rights: Standards and Practices in Hungary (‘Rui Tavares Report’)’. Retrieved 23 July 2014 fromhttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A7-2013-0229+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Whitefield, S. (1998), ‘The structuring of political cleavages in post-communist societies: the case of the czech republic and slovakia’, Political Studies XLVI: 115–139.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Whitefield, S. (2000), ‘Explaining the formation of electoral cleavages in postcommunist democracies’, In H.-D. Klingemann, E. Mochmann and K. Newton (eds), Elections in Central and Eastern Europe: The First Wave, Berlin: Sigma, pp. 36–70.Google Scholar
Fish, S.M. (1998), ‘Democratization’s requisites: the post-communist experience’, Post-Soviet Affairs 14(3): 212–247.Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2012), ‘Nations in transit 2012’. Retrieved 23 July 2014 from http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2012 Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2014a), ‘Nations in transit 2014 methodology’. Retrieved 7 September 2014 from http://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Methodology_Proof1.pdf Google Scholar
Freedom House (2014b), ‘Nations in transit 2014, Eurasia’s rupture with democracy’. Retrieved 23 July 2014 from http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/NIT2014booklet_WEBSITE.pdf Google Scholar
Freedom House. (2014c), ‘Nations in transit country report, Hungary’. Retrieved 7 September 2014 from http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2014/hungary-.VAyXaqhLHJ4 Google Scholar
Gamson, W.A. (1988), ‘Political discourse and collective action’, In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi and S. Tarrow (eds), International Social Movement Research, Vol. 1, From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures, Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 219–246.Google Scholar
Gamson, W.A. (1992), Talking Politics, Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gofas, A. and Hay, C. (eds) (2007), The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grabbe, H. (2006), The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2002), Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007), Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grzymalala-Busse, A. and Innes, A. (2003), ‘Great expectations: the eu and domestic political competition in east Central Europe’, East European Politics & Societies 17(1): 64–75.Google Scholar
Hanley, S., Szczerbiak, A., Haughton, T. and Fowler, B. (2008), ‘Sticking together, explaining comparative centre–right party success in post-communist central and Eastern Europe’, Party Politics 14(4): 407–434.Google Scholar
Hanson, S. (2001), ‘Defining democratic consolidation’, In R. Anderson, S. Fish and P. Roeder (eds), Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 126–151.Google Scholar
Haughton, T. (2005), Constraints and Opportunities of Leadership in Post-Communist Europe , Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2007), Why we Hate Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hungarian Central Statistical Office. (2013), ‘A nonprofit szektor legfontosabb jellemzői 2012-ben’. Retrieved 8 September 2014 from http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/stattukor/nonprofit/nonprofit12.pdf Google Scholar
Hungarian National Election Office. (2010), ‘2010 official election results’. Retrieved 8 September 2014 from http://www.valasztas.hu/hu/parval2010/354/354_0_index.html Google Scholar
Hungarian Parliament. (1989), ‘Act No. XX of 1949 (as amended)’. Retrieved 7 September 2014 from http://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/hungary/1989-90constitution_english.pdf Google Scholar
Hungarian Parliament. (2011), ‘The Fundamental Law of Hungary’. Retrieved 16 September 2013 from http://www.kormany.hu/download/e/02/00000/The New Fundamental Law of Hungary.pdf Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1993), Blood and Belonging, Toronto: Viking.Google Scholar
Innes, A. (2002), ‘Party competition in postcommunist Europe: the great electoral lottery’, Comparative Politics 35(1): 85–104.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J.T. (ed.) (1999), Communist Successor Parties in Post-Communist Politics, Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J.T. (2001), ‘Sickles with roses: the successor parties and democratic consolidation in post-communist politics’, In P.G. Lewis (ed.), Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe: The First Decade, London: Frank Cass, pp. 32–52.Google Scholar
Jackson, P.T. (2006), Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jasiewicz, K. (2007), ‘The political-party landscape’, Journal of Democracy 18(4): 26–33.Google Scholar
Jowitt, K. (1992), New World Disorder: the Leninist Extinction, Berkeley: University of California press.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (1995), ‘Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party’, Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (2009), ‘The cartel party thesis: a restatement’, Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 753–766.Google Scholar
King, C. (2000), ‘Post-postcommunism - transition, comparison and the end of “Eastern Europe”’, World Politics 53: 143–172.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., Markowski, R., Mansfeldova, Z. and Toka, G. (1999), Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P. (2006), ‘Political parties and the state in post-communist Europe: the nature of symbiosis’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22(3): 251–273.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P. (2007), Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P. and Mudde, C. (2000), ‘What has Eastern Europe taught us about the democratisation literature (and vice versa)?’ European Journal of Political Research 37: 517–539.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (2011), ‘Taking stock. Népszabadság’. Retrieved from http://nol.hu/gazdasag/janos_kornai__taking_stock Google Scholar
Kovács, K. and Tóth, G.A. (2011), ‘Hungary’s constitutional transformation’, European Constitutional Law Review 7: 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasovec, A. (2001), ‘Party and state in democratic Slovenia’, In P.G. Lewis (ed.), Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe: The First Decade, London: Frank Cass, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
Kubik, J. (2003), ‘Cultural legacies of state socialism – history making and cultural-political entrepreneurship in postcommunist Poland and russia’, In G. Ekiert and S.E. Hanson (eds), Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–351.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.G. (2001a), ‘Conclusion: party development and democratization in Eastern Europe’, In P.G. Lewis (ed.), Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe: The First Decade, London: Frank Cass, pp. 199–211.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.G. (2001b), ‘Introduction: democratization and political change in post-communist Europe’, In P.G. Lewis (ed.), Party Development and Democratic Change in post-Communist Europe: The First Decade, London: Frank Cass, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Lewis, P.G. (2006), ‘Party systems in post-communist Central Europe: patterns of stability and consolidation’, Democratization 13(4): 562–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1984), Democracies, Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1992), ‘Democratization and constitutional choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland, 1989–1991’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(2): 207–223.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (1978), The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. and Valenzuela, A. (eds) (1994), The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996), ‘Toward consolidated democracies’, Journal of Democracy 7: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1994), ‘The social requisites of democracy revisited: 1993 presidential address’, American Sociological Review 59(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (1997), ‘What is different about post-communist party systems?’, In P. Mair (ed.), Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 175–198.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003), ‘Rethinking representation’, The American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–528.Google Scholar
Manza, J. and Cook, F.L. (2002), ‘A democratic polity? Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States’, American Politics Research 30(6): 630–667.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2007), Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge, London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Markowski, R. (2001a), ‘Democratic consolidation and accountability: news from Eastern and Central European democracies’, In E. Wnuk-Lipinski and R. Markowski (eds), Transformative Paths in Central and Eastern Europe, Warsaw: Instytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Adamemii Nauk, pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
Markowski, R. (2001b), ‘Party system institutionalization in New Democracies: Poland, a trend-setter with no followers’, In P.G. Lewis (ed.), Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe: The First Decade, London: Frank Cass, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds) (2002), ‘The constitutive ambiguity of populism’, Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Michnik, A. (2007), ‘The Polish Witch-Hunt’. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 2 February 2015 from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2007/jun/28/the-polish-witch-hunt/?pagination=false Google Scholar
Millard, F. (2004), Elections, Parties, and Representation in Post-Communist Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miller, W. and White, S. (1998), ‘Political values underlying partisan cleavages in former communist countries’, Electoral Studies 17(2): 197–216.Google Scholar
Miller, W., White, S. and Heywood, P. (1997), Values and Political Change in Postcommunist Europe, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, M. (2002), ‘The radical right in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe: comparative observations and interpretations’, East European Politics and Societies 16: 335–362.Google Scholar
Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (1997), ‘Trust, distrust and skepticism: popular evaluations of civil and political institutions societies in post-communist’, The Journal of Politics 59(2): 418–451.Google Scholar
Misztal, B.A. (1996), Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2005), ‘The ‘end of politics’ and the challenge of right-wing populism’, In F. Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2002), ‘In the name of the peasantry, the proletariat, and the people: populism in Eastern Europe’, In Y. Mény and Y. Surel (eds), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 214–232.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2006), ‘A defense of party spirit’, Perspectives on Politics 4(4): 713–727.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. and Rosenblum, N.L. (2006), ‘Political liberalism vs. “the great game of politics”: the politics of political liberalism’, Perspectives on Politics 4(1): 99–108.Google Scholar
Norwegian Helsinki Commitee. (2013), ‘Democracy and Human Rights at stake in Hungary, The Viktor Orbán government’s drive for centralisation of power’. Retrieved 23 July 2014 from http://nhc.no/filestore/Publikasjoner/Rapporter/2013/Rapport_1_13_web.pdf Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (1996), ‘Illusions about consolidation’, Journal of Democracy 7(2): 34–51.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. and Whitehead, L. (1986), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, C. (2008), ‘Re-stating party development in central and Eastern Europe: a response’, Czech Sociological Review 44(6): 1181–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. (2004), ‘Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe’, Social Research 71(3): 501–528.Google Scholar
Olson, D.M. (1998), ‘Party formation and party system consolidation in the new democracies of Central Europe’, Political Studies XLVI: 432–464.Google Scholar
Orbán, V. (2013), ‘Speech for the comemoration of the 1956 uprising, October 23, 2013’. Retrieved 24 September 2014 from http://www.miniszterelnok.hu/beszed/kozeledunk_a_valodi_felszabadulas_fele Google Scholar
Orbán, V. (2014), ‘Speech at the Free University and Student Camp in Baˇile Tuşnad, Romania’. Retrieved 24 September 2014 from http://www.kormany.hu/hu/a-miniszterelnok/beszedek-publikaciok-interjuk/a-munkaalapu-allam-korszaka-kovetkezik. English translation at: http://budapestbeacon.com/public-policy/full-text-of-viktor-orbans-speech-at-baile-tusnad-tusnadfurdo-of-26-july-2014/ Google Scholar
OSCE. (2002), ‘Republic of Hungary, Parliamentary elections 7 and 21 April 2002, final report’. Retrieved 22 September 2014 from http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/hungary/16177?download=true Google Scholar
OSCE (2011), ‘Analysis of the Hungarian Media Legislation’. Tallinn University for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media. Retrieved 29 July 2014 from http://www.osce.org/fom/75990?download=true Google Scholar
OSCE (2014), ‘Hungary, Parliamentary Elections, 6 April 2014, OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission final report’. Retrieved 8 September 2014 from http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/hungary/121098?download=true Google Scholar
Palonen, E. (2006), Reading Budapest: Political Polarization in Contemporary Hungary. Ph.D. in ideology and discourse, University of Essex, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Palonen, E. (2009), ‘Political polarisation and populism in contemporary hungary’, Parliamentary Affairs 62(2): 318–334.Google Scholar
Panizza, F. (2005), ‘Introduction’, In F. Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London: Verso, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Pharr, S.J. and Putnam, R.D. (eds) (2000), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Democracies?, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Plasser, F., Ulram, P.A. and Waldrauch, H. (1998), Democratic Consolidation in East-Central Europe, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Plattner, M.F. and Diamond, L.J. (eds) (1996), The Global Resurgence of Democracy, 2nd edn., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Political Capital. (2011), ‘The New Hungarian Media Law: evaluation and summary’. Retrieved 1 August 2014 from http://www.riskandforecast.com/post/hungary/the-new-hungarian-media-law-evaluation-and-summary_645.html Google Scholar
Political Capital. (2013), ‘New Electoral System in the home stretch, an analysis of the effects of the New Hungarian Electoral Procedure Law and the Campaign Finance Law’. Retrieved 2 August 2014 from http://www.valasztasirendszer.hu/wp-content/uploads/PC_New_Electoral_System_In_The_Home_Stretch_20130723.pdf Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991), Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J.A. and Limongi, F. (1996), ‘What makes democracies endure?’, Journal of Democracy 7(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Renwick, A. (2010), The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, A.L. (2010), The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Public Preferences and Policy Reforms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. and Lipset, S.M. (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Makkai, T. (1995), ‘Consensus or dissensus about welfare in post-communist societies?’, European Journal of Political Research 28(2): 203–224.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Mishler, W. (1998), ‘Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries’, Electoral Studies 17(2): 217–234.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N.L. (2008), On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, J. and Wingfield, N.M. (2000), Return to Diversity: A Political History of East Central Europe since World War II, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rupnik, J. (2007), ‘From democracy fatigue to populist backlash’, Journal of Democracy 18(4): 17–25.Google Scholar
Saltman, E.M. (2014), ‘Turning right: contemporary political socialization of the Hungarian youth’. Ph.D. thesis. University College London.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1968), ‘The sociology of parties: a critical review’, In O. Stammer (ed.), Party Systems, Party Organizations, and the Politics of New Masses, Berlin: Freie Universität, Institut für Politische Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2010), The Representative Claim, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schatz, E. (ed.) (2009), Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (1998), ‘What is democratic consolidation?’, Journal of Democracy 9(2): 91–107.Google Scholar
Schensul, J.J. and LeCompte, M.D. (eds) (1999), The Ethnographer’s Toolkit, Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A. (2008), ‘Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 303–326.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. (1992), ‘The consolidation of democracy and representation of social groups’, American Behavioural Scientist 35: 422–449.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. and Karl, T.L. (1991), ‘What democracy is… and is not’, Journal of Democracy 2(3): 75–88.Google Scholar
Schneider, C.Q. and Schmitter, P.C. (2004), ‘Liberalization, transition and consolidation: measuring the components of democratization’, Democratization 11(5): 59–90.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Sikk, A. (2005), ‘How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 44: 391–412.Google Scholar
Sitter, N. and Batory, A. (2006), ‘Election Briefing no. 28, Europe and the Hungarian elections of April 2006’. Retrieved 22 September 2014 from https://http://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=epern-election-briefing-no-28.pdf&site=266 Google Scholar
Sniderman, P.M. and Theriault, S.M. (2004), ‘The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing’, In W.E. Saris and P.M. Sniderman (eds), Studies in Public Opinion, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 133–165.Google Scholar
Stanley, B. (2008), ‘The thin ideology of populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95–110.Google Scholar
Stark, D. and Bruszt, L. (1998), Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, J.r., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. and Steenbergen, M.R. (2004), Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, A. (2001), ‘The ‘professionalization’ of party campaigning in post-communist Poland’, In P.G. Lewis (ed.), Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe: the First Decade, London: Frank Cass, pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, A. and Hanley, S. (2004), ‘Introduction: understanding the politics of the right in contemporary East–Central Europe’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20(3): 1–8.Google Scholar
Székely, L. (2014), ‘Opinion of the Hungarian Ombudsman Lászlo Székely on the legality of KEHI’s state audit on NGO’s financed through the Norwegian Civil Support Fund’. Retrieved 8 September 2014 from http://www.transparency.hu/uploads/docs/ombudsman_levele_miniszterelnoksegnek.pdf Google Scholar
Szikinger, I. (2001), ‘Hungary’s pliable constitution’, In J. Zielonka (ed.), Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 1, Institutional Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2012), ‘Organizing for success: party organizational strength and electoral performance in postcommunist Europe’, The Journal of Politics 74(1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, V. (1998), Fantasies of Salvation: Post-Communist Political Mythologies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, V. (2002), Discomforts of Victory: Democracy, Liberal Values, and Nationalism in Post-Communist Europe, San Domenico di Fiesole Italy: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre.Google Scholar
Tóka, G. (1996), ‘Parties and electoral choices in east-central Europe’, In P.G. Lewis and G. Pridham (eds), Stabilising Fragile Democracies: Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 100–125.Google Scholar
Tóka, G. (1998), ‘Party appeals and voter loyalty in new democracies’, Political Studies XLVI: 589–610.Google Scholar
Toole, J. (2000), ‘Government formation and party system stabilization in East Central Europe’, Party Politics 6(4): 441–461.Google Scholar
Transparency International Hungary. (2014), ‘Transparency International turns to the Ombudsman regarding recent government audit’. Retrieved 8 September 2014 from http://www.transparency.hu/TI_turns_to_the_Ombudsman_regarding_recent_government_audit?bind_info=index&bind_id=0 Google Scholar
Troev, T. and Buckley, N. (2013), ‘Bulgarian elections marred by claims of voting fraud’. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a99213a8-b98d-11e2-bc57-00144feabdc0.html Google Scholar
Tworzecki, H. (2003), Learning to Choose: Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. (2013), ‘Helsinki Commission hearing on “The trajectory of Democracy – Why Hungary Matters”’. Retrieved 23 July 2014 from http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewDetail&ContentRecord_id=539&Region_id=0&Issue_id=0&ContentType=H,B&ContentRecordType=H&CFID=26361986&CFTOKEN=c913fa608e26bcce-DF0375B6-9908-1777-4C6667FC43655A4F Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006), Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vachudova, M.A. (2008), ‘Tempered by the EU? Political parties and party systems before and after accession’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 861–879.Google Scholar
van Biezen, I. (2003), Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
van der Brug, W., Franklin, M. and Tóka, G. (2008), ‘One electorate or many? Differences in party preference formation between new and established European democracies’, Electoral Studies 27(4): 589–600.Google Scholar
Vanhuysse, P. (2006), Divide and Pacify: Strategic Social Policies and Political Protests in Post-Communist Democracies, Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
White, J. (2009), ‘The social theory of mass politics’, The Journal of Politics 71(1): 96–112.Google Scholar
White, J. (2011), Political Allegiance After European Integration, Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
White, J. and Ypi, L. (2010), ‘Rethinking the modern prince: partisanship and the democratic ethos’, Political Studies 58(4): 809–828.Google Scholar
White, J. and Ypi, L. (2011), ‘On partisan political justification’, American Political Science Review 105(2): 381–396.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, J. (2006), Crucibles of Political Loyalty: Church Institutions and Electoral Continuity in Hungary, New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Young, I.M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zakaria, F. (1997), ‘The rise of illiberal democracy’, Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22–43.Google Scholar
Zielonka, J. (ed.) (2001), Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 1, Institutional Engineering, Oxford Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar