Skip to main content
×
Home

Religious reasons in the public sphere: an empirical study of religious actors’ argumentative patterns in Swiss direct democratic campaigns

  • André Bächtiger (a1), Judith Könemann (a2), Ansgar Jödicke (a3) and Dominik Hangartner (a4)
Abstract

The ‘going public’ of religious actors is taking central stage both in religious studies and political philosophy. But this ‘going public’ of religious actors is controversial. The debate revolves around the question of whether religious actors must frame their religious convictions in terms of secular reasons or whether they should be allowed to introduce religiously grounded beliefs into public political argument without constraints. Despite vigorous and ongoing debate, there is little systematic and empirical research on this question. This article focuses on the public statements of religious actors in the context of Swiss direct democratic votes on abortion and immigration. Our empirical findings reveal an interesting gap: while many political philosophers and religious thinkers have moved to a position where religious actors can – and even should – openly employ religious arguments, the practice of religious actors in Switzerland is different. The larger denominations of Catholics and Protestants especially have a tendency to use a great amount of secular vocabulary. In addition, our findings also reveal that the use of religious or secular reasons varies considerably according to different issues, different media types (religious vs. secular press), different religious traditions, different alliance structures, and different media genres, while there is no clear time trend.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mails: Andre.Baechtiger@unilu.ch
References
Hide All
Audi R. (2000), Religious Commitment and Secular Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boettcher J.W.Harmon J. (2009), ‘Introduction: religion and the public sphere’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 35: 522.
Bruce S. (2002), God is Dead: Secularization in the West, Oxford: Blackwell.
Carter S.L. (1993), The Culture of Disbelief. How American Law and Politics Trivialize Religious Devotion, New York: Basic Books.
Casanova J. (1994), Public Religion in the Modern World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coleman J.A. (2001), ‘Public religion and religion in public’, Wake Forest Law Review 36: 279304.
Davie G. (1994), Religion in Britain Since 1945. Believing Without Belonging, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davie G. (2000), Religion in Modern Europe. Am Memory Mutates, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dobbelaere K. (2002), Secularization. An Analysis at Three Levels, Bruxelles: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
Entman R.M. (1993), ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43: 5158.
Gabriel K. (1996), Religiöse Individualisierung und Säkularisierung. Biographie und Gruppe als Bezugspunkte moderner Religiosität, Gütersloh: Chr. Kaiser/Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Gelman A.Hill J. (2007), Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S.Rubin D.B. (2003), Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn., London: Chapman & Hall.
Gelman A., Jakulin A., Pittau M.G.Su Y-S. (2008), ‘A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models’, The Annals of Applied Statistics 2: 13601383.
Gill J. (2007), Bayesian Methods for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn., Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.
Giugni M.Passy F. (2002), ‘Between post-nationalism and neo-institutionalism: the structuring of public debates in Switzerland in the field of immigration and ethnic relations’, Swiss Political Science Review 8: 2152.
Firth D. (1993), ‘Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates’, Biometrika 80: 2738.
Habermas J. (2006), ‘Religion in the public sphere’, European Journal of Philosophy 14: 125.
Hänggli R. (2010), ‘Frame building and framing effects in direct-democratic campaigns’. PhD thesis, Zurich: University of Zurich.
Hervieu-Léger D. (1999), Le pélerin et le converti. La religion en movement, Paris: Editions Champs-Flammarion.
Kettell S. (2009), ‘On the public discourse of religion: an analysis of Christianity in the United Kingdom’, Politics and Religion 2: 420443.
Klemp N.J. (2010), ‘The Christian right: engaged citizens or theocratic crusaders?’, Politics and Religion 3: 127.
Koopmans R.Statham P. (1999), ‘Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches’, Mobilization 4: 203221.
Kriesi H., Bernard L.Hänggli R. (2009), ‘The politics of campaigning – dimensions of strategic action’, in F. Marcincowski and B. Pfetsch (eds), Politik in der Mediendemokratie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 345–366.
Lafont C. (2007), ‘Religion in the public sphere: remarks on Habermas's conception of public deliberation in postsecular societies’, Constellations 14: 239259.
Luckmann T. (1967), The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society, New York: Macmillan.
McGraw B.T. (2010), Faith in Politics. Religion and Liberal Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris P.Inglehart R. (2004), Sacred and Secular, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris P., Curtice J., Sanders D., Scammell M.Semetko H.A. (1999), On Message. Communicating the Campaign, London: Sage.
Perry M.J. (2001), ‘Why political reliance on religiously grounded morality is not illegitimate in a liberal democracy’, Wake Forest Law Review 36: 217249.
Pollack D. (2003), Säkularisierung – ein moderner Mythos, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag.
Pollack D. (2009), Rückkehr des Religiösen?, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag.
Rawls J. (1993), Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Schockenhoff E. (1996), Naturrecht und Menschenwürde. Universale Ethik in einer geschichtlichen Welt, Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.
Sniderman P.M.Theriault S.M. (2004), ‘The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing’, in P.M. Sniderman and S.M. Theriault (eds), Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error and Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 133165.
Solum L.B. (1990), ‘Faith and justice’. DePaul Law Review 39: 1083.
Weithman, P.J. (ed.) (1997), Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Weithman P.J. (2002), Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolterstorff N. (1997a), ‘The role of religion in decision and discussions of political issues’, in R. Audi and N. Wolterstorff (eds), Religion in the Public Square. The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate, Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 67120.
Wolterstorff N. (1997b), ‘Why we should reject what liberalism tells us about speaking and acting in public for religious reasons’, in P.J. Weithman (ed.), Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 162181.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 159 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.