Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-htx7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-13T12:32:01.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decline, adaptation and relevance: political parties and their researchers in the twentieth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Anika Gauja  and
Karina Kosiara-Pedersen
Anika Gauja*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Social Sciences Building A02, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Karina Kosiara-Pedersen*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Østre Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Anika.gauja@sydney.edu.au
kp@ifs.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sub-field of political party research is an interesting case study of the broader development of the discipline of political science over the past 20 years as it demonstrates the reflexive and evolving relationship between politics researchers and the organizations that they study. Party research has moved on from crises of existence, to studying the resilience and adaptation of these organizations with new and evolving methodologies that have taken party research into the twenty-first century and fostered more collaborative, specialist and increasingly internationalized relationships within the research community. In the last two decades, expectations around research engagement and impact have heightened in response to changes in the research funding environment and the political pressure to demonstrate the ongoing relevance of the discipline has intensified. The increasingly heterogeneous, specialized and quantified nature of the subfield has enabled party scholarship to find impact and relevance through the provision of technical advice to parties and policymakers, thereby affecting how parties organize. However, while political party researchers have been able to engage audiences outside academia with this specialized and technical advice, the sub-discipline has shifted away from some of the “bigger picture”, normative questions surrounding the role of parties in modern representative democracies.

Keywords

MethodsParty changeParty researchPolitical partiesResearch field history

Information

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
European Political Science , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 123 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achury, S., Scarrow, S.E., Kosiara-Pedersen, K., and van Haute, E.. 2020. The Consequences of Membership Incentives: Do Greater Political Benefits Attract Different Kinds of Members? Party Politics 26(1): 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818754603. Google Scholar
Albertazzi, D., and McDonnell, D.. 2015. Populists in Power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allern, E.H., Hansen, V., Marshall, D., Rasmussen, A., and Webb, P. 2020. Competition and Interaction: Party Ties to Interest Groups in a Multidimensional Policy Space European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12403 Google Scholar
Allern, E.H., Heidar, K., and Karlsen, R.. 2016. After the Mass Party: Continuity and Change in Political Parties and Representation in Norway. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bale, T., Webb, P., and Poletti, M.. 2019. Footsoldiers: Political Party Membership in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, L. 1997. Partier I Forandring. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Bille, L. 2001. Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality? Candidate Selection in Western European Parties, 1960–1990. Party Politics 7(3): 363-380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolleyer, N. 2018. The State and Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H. and Stewart, M.. 1998. The Decline of Parties in the Minds of Citizens. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357-378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa Lobo, M., and Razzuloli, I. 2017. Party Finance and Perceived Party Responsiveness. In Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power, ed. Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S.E., and Webb, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Cross, W., and Blais, A.. 2012a. Politics at the Centre: The Selection and Removal of Party Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, W., and Blais, A.. 2012b. Who Selects the Party Leader? Party Politics 18(2): 127-150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. 2008. Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies 56(1): 76-93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. and Wattenberg, M., eds. 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Dalton, R., and Weldon, S.. 2005. Public Images of Political Parties: A Necessary Evil? West European Politics 28: 931-951. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demker, M., Heidar, K., and Kosiara-Pedersen, K.. 2019. Nordic Party Members: Linkages in Troubled Times. London: ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
den Ridder, J., van Holsteijn, J., and Koole, R.A.. 2015. Party Membership in the Netherlands. In Party Members and Activists, ed. van Haute, E. and Gauja, A.. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar
Döring, H., and Regel, S.. 2020. Party Facts: A Database of Political Parties Worldwide. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818820671 Google Scholar
Duverger, M. 1951. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
EC [European Commission]. 2018. Horizon 2020 Interim Evaluation: Maximising the Impact of EU Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Union. Google Scholar
Gallagher, M., and Marsh, M.. 2002. Days of Blue Loyalty. The Politics of Membership of the Fine Gael Party. Dublin: PSAI.Google Scholar
Gauja, A. 2015. The Construction of Party Membership. European Journal of Political Research 54(2): 232-248. Google Scholar
Gauja, A. 2016. Dilemmas of Party Regulation: Hands-On Courts Versus Hands-Off Legislators? In Party Rules: Dilemmas of Political Party Regulation in Australia, ed. Gauja, A. and Sawer, M.. Canberra: ANU Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauja, A., and Kosiara-Pedersen, K.. 2021. The Comparative Study of Political Party Organization: Changing Perspectives and Prospects. Ephemera: Theory and Politics. in Organization.Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. 2019. The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., Greffet, F., and Cantijoch, M.. 2017. Friend or Foe? Digital Technologies and the Changing Nature of Party Membership. Political Communication 34(1): 89-111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, R., and Svåsand, L.. 1997. Preface. Party Politics 3(3): 291-292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidar, K. 1994. The Polymorphic Nature of Party Membership. European Journal of Political Research 25(1): 61-86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidar, K., and Kosiara-Pedersen, K.. 2006. Party Feminism: Gender Gaps Within Nordic Political Parties. Scandinavian Political Studies 29(3): 192-218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidar, K., Kosiara-Pedersen, K., and Saglie, J. 2012. Party Change and Party Member Participation in Denmark and Norway. In Democracy, Elections and Political Parties: Essays in Honor of Jørgen Elklit, ed. Blom-Hansen, J., Green-Pedersen, C., and Skaaning, S.E.. Politica: Aarhus. Google Scholar
Heidar, K., and Wauters, B.. 2019. Do Political Parties Still Represent? An Analysis of the Representativeness of Political Parties in Western Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Janda, K. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Justitsministeriet. 2015. Betænkning om åbenhed om økonomisk støtte til politiske partier, 1550. Betænkning: Udvalget om åbenhed om den økonomiske støtte til politiske partier. Google Scholar
Karvonen, L. 2007. Legislation on Political Parties: A Global Comparison. Party Politics 13(4): 437-455. Google Scholar
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P.. 1992. Party Organizations: A Data Handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P.. 1992. Membership of Political Parties in European Democracies, 1960–1990. European Journal of Political Research 22(3): 329-345. Google Scholar
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P.. 1994. How Parties Organize. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P.. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organizations and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics 1(1): 5-28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P.. 2018. Democracy and the Cartelization of Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, O. 1966. The Transformation of the Western European Party System In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. Lapalombara, J. and Weiner, M.. Princeton University Press: Princeton. Google Scholar
Kölln, A.K. and J. Polk. 2015. Svenske partimedlemsundersökingen. Resultatredovisning, University of Gothenburg, Department of Political Science. http://pol.gu.se/partiforskningsprogrammet/Forskning+om+partier/partimedlemsundersokning.Google Scholar
Kosiara-Pedersen, K. 2017. Demokratiets Ildsjæle. Partimedlemmer i Danmark. København: DJØF forlag.Google Scholar
Kosiara-Pedersen, K., Scarrow, S., van Haute, E. 2017. Rules of Engagement? Party Membership Costs, New Forms of Party Affiliation, and Partisan Participation. In Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power, ed. Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S.E., and Webb, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Lawson, K. and Merkl, P., eds. 1988. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternate Organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P., ed. 1990. The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Mair, P., and van Biezen, I.. 2001. Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies: 1980–2000. Party Politics 7(1): 5-21. Google Scholar
McKenzie, R. 1963. British Political Parties: The Distribution of Power Within the Conservative and Labour Parties. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Michels, R. 1911. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchic Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Mole, Beth. 2013. NSF cancels political science grant cycle. Nature 2 August 2013. https://www.nature.com/news/nsf-cancels-political-science-grant-cycle-1.13501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Pheonix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogawa, H., M. Tanaka, A. Takashima, Y. Ajishi, and T. Uekami. 2019. Explaining how parties respond to multi-level governance in Europe. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, University of Wraclaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Önnudóttir, E.H., and Á.E. Björnsdóttir. 2014. Icelandic National Election Study (ICENES) 2013 Election: Sample Design and Data Collection Report. http://fel.hi.is/sites/fel.hi.is/files/islenska_kosningarannsoknin/ICENESSecondrelease/2014/ICENES_2013/icenes_2013_design_report_english.pdf.Google Scholar
OSCE. 2011. Guidelines for Political Party Regulation. OSCE: Warsaw. Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, M. 1903. La democratie et l’organization des partis politique. Paris: Calmann-Levy.Google Scholar
Panebianco, A. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K., Bille, L., Buch, R., Elklit, J., Hansen, B. and Nielsen, H.J.. 2004. Sleeping or Active Partners? Danish Party Members at the Turn of the Millennium. Party Politics 10: 367-383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, K., and Saglie, J.. 2005. New Technology in Ageing Parties: Internet Use in Danish and Norwegian Parties. Party Politics 11(3): 359-377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, J., Svåsand, L., and Widfeldt, A.. 2000. State Subsidies to Political Parties: Confronting Rhetoric with Reality. West European Politics 23(3): 1-24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilet, J.B., and Cross, W.. 2014. The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pilet, J.B. and Cross, W., eds. 2016. The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S.E., Webb, P.D., Allern, E.H., Aylott, N., van Biezen, I., Calossi, E., Costa Lobo, M., Cross, W.P., Deschouwer, K., Enyedi, Z., Fabre, E., Farrell, D., Gauja, A., Pizzimenti, E., Kopecký, P., Koole, R., Müller, W., Kosiara-Pedersen, K., Rahat, G., Szczerbiak, A., van Haute, E., and Verge, T.. 2016. Party Rules, Party Resources and the Politics of Parliamentary Democracies: How Parties Organize in the 21st Century. Party Politics 22(6): 661-678. Google Scholar
Ponce, A., and Scarrow, S.. 2016. Which Members? Using Cross-National Surveys to Study Party Membership. Party Politics 22(6): 679-690. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, G., and Kenig, O.. 2018. From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, S. 2000. Parties Without Members? Party Organization in a Changing Electoral Environment. In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Scarrow, S. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, S. and Gezgor, B.. 2010. Declining Memberships, Changing Members? European Political Party Members in a New Era. Party Politics 16: 823-843. Google Scholar
Scarrow, S., Webb, P., and Poguntke, T.. 2017. Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seyd, P., and Whiteley, P.. 1994. True Blues: The Politics of Conservative Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
van Biezen, I., and Kopecky, P. 2017. The Paradox of Party Funding: The Limited Impact of State Subsidies on Party Membership. In Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power, ed. Scarrow, S., Webb, P., and Poguntke, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
van Biezen, I., Mair, P., and Poguntke, T.. 2012. Going, Going…Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 24-56. Google Scholar
van Haute, E., and Gauja, A.. 2015. Party Members and Activists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Haute, E., Paulis, E., and Sierens, V.D.. 2018. Assessing Party Membership Figures: The MAPP Dataset. European Political Science 17(3): 366-377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, A. 2011. Exceptionalism, Political Science and the Comparative Analysis of Political Parties. Government and Opposition 46(4): 411-435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, P., Seyd, P., and Richardson, J.. 1994. True Blues: The Politics of Conservative Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar