Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:51:13.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2783 – Distress Level and Treatment Outcome in Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Enero
Affiliation:
Mental Health, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Terrassa, Spain
A. Soler
Affiliation:
Mental Health, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Terrassa, Spain
I. Ramos
Affiliation:
Mental Health, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Terrassa, Spain
S. Cardona
Affiliation:
Mental Health, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Terrassa, Spain
R. Guillamat
Affiliation:
Mental Health, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Terrassa, Spain
V. Valles
Affiliation:
Mental Health, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (CST), Terrassa, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Previous research has linked OCPD with increased distress levels that may lead to differences in treatment response.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to investigate the influence of pre-treatment distress on patient's response to groupbased cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCPD.

Methods:

116 out-patients who met DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for OCPD completed a pre-treatment assessment including BDI, STAI, STAXI-2, GRAI and Rosemberg Self-Esteem Scale. Pre-treatment distress was operationalized as depression and anxiety levels.

Intervention was comprised of ten group sessions including psychoeducation, specific CBT techniques and relapse prevention. in order to assess treatment response after intervention, the sample was divided in two groups:

  1. 1) discharged patients -responders and

  2. 2) patients who needed to continue treatment -non responders.

Assessment scores were compared using t test in order to analyze differences between groups. The extent to which potential predictor variables were related to treatment response was assessed using logistic regression.

Results:

Results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in depressed mood and state anxiety scores between responder and non-responder groups. Initial variable selection for logistic regression model included age, sex, depression, anxiety, anger, assertiveness and selfesteem scores. The final model included state anxiety as a significant predictor of treatment response.

Conclusions:

Our findings indicate that responder patients had lower pre-treatment distress levels than non-responder patients and that state anxiety score is a significant predictor of group-based CBT response in OCPD. According to this, pretreatment distress levels might be considered for treatment planning, despite more research in this direction would be necessary.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.