Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-h7vld Total loading time: 0.181 Render date: 2022-03-06T06:50:32.748Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Significant difference in knowledge between English and Danish psychiatrists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Lars Hansen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Brintons Terrace, Southampton SO14 0YG, UK School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK
John W. McDonald
Affiliation:
Social Statistics and Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: lh4@soton.ac.uk (L. Hansen).
Get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate if differences in levels of knowledge existed between Danish and English training and specialist psychiatrists. This is important in the context of the free (and growing) movement of the medical workforce across European Union (EU) countries’ borders.

Methods

A complete balanced two-way factorial study design was used. Ten training and ten specialist psychiatrists were recruited in each country from reputable, university hospitals. They answered 50 multiple choice questions (MCQs), translated into the appropriate language, consisting of four subcategories of questions: psychology (15 MCQs), psychopharmacology (10 MCQs), neuroscience (five MCQs) and psychopathology (20 MCQs). No memory or other types of aids were allowed at the knowledge test. A two-way analysis of variance was used to analyse the total knowledge score (number of correct answers) and the component subscores. Levene’s test of equality of error variances was used to test for variance homogeneity.

Results

There were significant differences in total knowledge and psychology knowledge by country and level of training. UK doctors scored 3.10 points higher than Danish doctors, with 95% confidence interval (0.97, 5.23). The knowledge of the specialists was also significantly superior to that of the training psychiatrists, with 2.30 higher score, 95% confidence interval (0.17, 4.43). In the sub-categories only the scores in the psychology section were significantly different. UK doctors scored 2.30 higher than Danish doctors, with 95% confidence interval (1.15, 3.45). Specialists scored 1.20 higher than non-specialists with 95% confidence interval (0.05, 2.35).

Conclusions

The results indicate that there is a significant difference in level of knowledge between psychiatrists in these two EU-countries, England and Denmark. This difference seemed to be chiefly the result of different knowledge of psychology. The disparity could be a result of the fundamentally different post-graduate training system in psychiatry in the two countries. Surprisingly, the differences in total knowledge and psychology knowledge between countries were larger than the differences between levels of training. The difference in knowledge is worrying taking into consideration that there is free movement of the workforce, including doctors, across the EU. The results here need further confirmation in future studies with greater numbers, more countries involved and perhaps additional measurements to MCQs.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier SAS 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggernaes, H, Lindhardt, APsychiatric training in Denmark. J Eur Arch Psych Clin Neurosci 247(Suppl 1):1997 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, LK, Thomsen, AFPsychiatric training in two different EU countries: Denmark and the UK. Psychiatr Bull 2000;24: 309311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, L, Bruce, JPsychiatric training in Italy. Psychiatr Bull 1998;22: 762763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C, Protheoroe, D, Brownlee, KMCQ technique. 2nd ed Pass the MRCPsych, Part 1 and 2 2000 W.B. Saunders London, UK [Chapter 3]Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Significant difference in knowledge between English and Danish psychiatrists
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Significant difference in knowledge between English and Danish psychiatrists
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Significant difference in knowledge between English and Danish psychiatrists
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *