Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-zczlx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-08T23:18:22.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of and satisfaction with support received among survivors from three Scandinavian countries after the 2004 Southeast Asian tsunami

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P.O. Michel ,
S. Rosendal ,
L. Weisaeth  and
T. Heir
P.O. Michel*
Affiliation:
National Centre for Disaster Psychiatry/Akademiska sjukhuset/Uppsala University, 75185Uppsala, Sweden
S. Rosendal
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Section 7421, Center for Crisis and Disaster Psychiatry/University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 9, 2100Copenhagen, Denmark
L. Weisaeth
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, Building 48, 0407Oslo, Norway
T. Heir
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, Building 48, 0407Oslo, Norway
*
⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 18 6118825; fax: +46 186118890. E-mail address: per-olof.michel@neuro.uu.se (P.O. Michel).
Get access

Abstract

Introduction

There is limited guidance regarding effective preventions for post-disaster mental health problems and what kind of support is preferred by disaster survivors.

Aim

To describe the use of and satisfaction with support in three Scandinavian countries after the tsunami and analyzing the association between support and posttraumatic stress reactions.

Method

The sample comprises 6772 responders who returned to Scandinavia from the tsunami-struck countries of Southeast Asia in 2004.

Results

Most were satisfied with informal support on site. Support from embassies/consulates was not received well, leaving about 64% of the Danes/Norwegians and 73% of the Swedes dissatisfied. After returning home, support from close relatives rendered highest degree of satisfaction. Consultation with general practitioner (GP) was reported by 63% of Norwegians, 40% of Danes, and 16% of Swedes. Most responders (60–77%) were satisfied with their GP, although Norwegians were least satisfied. Using support was associated with higher levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Conclusions

Informal support was used to a high degree and rendered considerable satisfaction in all three countries, while the use of and satisfaction with formal support varied more. Lack of satisfaction with embassies and consulates may indicate deficiencies in the authorities’ preparedness in assisting disaster stricken citizens abroad.

Keywords

StressPosttraumatic stress disorderQuality of care

Information

Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 26 , Issue 7 , October 2011 , pp. 436 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, M.L.Ford, J.D.Dailey, W.F.Predictors of getting help among Connecticut adults after September 11, 2001. American Journal of Public Health 2004; 94: 1596–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APA American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM IV. Washington DC; American Psychiatric Association, 1994.Google Scholar
Benight, C.C.Swift, E.Sanger, J.Smith, A.Zeppelin, D.Coping self-efficacy as a prime mediator of distress following a natural disaster. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1999; 29: 2443–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergh-Johannesson, K.Lundin, T.Michel, P.O.Specialists teams for trauma-related disorders-in short supply in Sweden. There is a lack of both resources and effective therapeutic methods, a survey shows. Läkartidningen. Journal of the Swedish Medical Association 2005 102(47) 3532 3535-6Google Scholar
Bisson, J.I.Tavakoly, B.Witteveen, A.B.Ajdukovic, D.Jehel, L.Johansen, V.J.et al.TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi process. British Journal of Psychiatry 2010; 196: 69–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewin, C.R.Andrew, B.Valentine, J.D.Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68: 748–766CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, R.A.Litz, B.Mental health treatments in the wake of disaster.Neria, Y.Galea, S.Norris, F.H.Mental health and disasters. New York:Cambridge University Press; 2009 321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission for evaluation of the Norwegian authorities’ dealing with the 2004 South-East Asian Tsunami, Reinås J. 26:12 (In Norwegian). Oslo: Government Administration Services; 2005.Google Scholar
Elhai, J.D.Ford, J.D.Utilizations of mental health services after disasters.Neria, Y.Galea, S.Norris, F.H.Mental health and disasters New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009 366–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elhai, J.D.North, T.C.Frueh, B.C.Health service use predictors among trauma survivors: a critical review. Psychological services 2005; 2: 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J.D.Adams, M.L.Dailey, W.F.Prevalence and risk factors for psychological problems and patterns of receipt of help by Connecticut adults 5–15 months after the September 11th terrorist incidents. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2006; 41: 261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galea, S.Vlahov, D.Resnick, H.Ahearn, J.Susser, E.Gold, J.et al.Trends of probable posttraumatic stress disorder in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks. American Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 158: 514–524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heir, TRosendal, SBergh-Johannesson, KMichel, POMortensen, ELWeisæth, Let al. Tsunami-affected Scandinavian tourists: disaster exposure and post traumatic stress symptoms. Nordic J Psychiatry 2010, [in press].Google ScholarPubMed
Heir, T.Weisaeth, L.Acute disaster exposure and mental health complaints of Norwegian tsunami survivors six months post disaster. Psychiatry 7132008 266–276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heir, T.Hussain, A.Weisæth, L.Managing after-effects of disaster trauma; the essentials of early intervention. European Psychiatric Review 2008; 1: 66–69Google Scholar
Hjemdal OK. General practitioners follow up of tsunami survivors in Norway. (Fastlegens oppfölging av de berörte etter tsunamin). Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies. Report no 1; 2007.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S.E.Watson, P.Bell, C.C.Bryant, R.A.Brymer, M.J.Friedman, M.J.et al.Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry Winter 2007 70(4) 283–314Google ScholarPubMed
Jankovic-Gavrilovic, J.Schützwohl, M.Fazal, M.Priebe, S.Who seeks treatment after a traumatic event and who does not? A review of findings on mental health service utilization. Journal of traumatic stress 2005; 18: 595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Child Traumatic Stress Network & National Center for PTSD. Psychological First Aid: Field Operations Guide 2nd Edition. www.nctsn.org; www.ncptsd.va.gov; 2006.Google Scholar
Norris, F.H.Kaniasty, K.Received and perceived social supporting times of stress: a test of social support deterioration deterrence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996; 71: 498–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olff, M.Langeland, W.Draijer, N.Gersons, B.P.R.Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Bulletin 2007 133(2) 183–20410.1037/0033-2909.133.2.183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennebaker, J.W.Mehl, M.R.Niederhoffer, K.G.Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54: 547–577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raphael, B.When disaster strikes. New York: Basic Books: 1986Google Scholar
Raphael, B.Middleton, W.Mental health responses in a decade of disasters: Australia, 1974–1983. Hosp Community Psychiatry Dec 1987 38 (12) 1331–1337Google Scholar
Swedish Government Official Reports. Sweden and the tsunami: evaluation and suggestions. Main report from the 2005 Disaster Commission, SOU 2005: 104 (In Swedish). Stockholm: Swedish Government Official Reports; 2005.Google Scholar
van Griensven, F.Chakkraband, M.L.Thienkrua, W.Pengjuntr, W.Lopes Cardozo, B.Tantipiwatanaskul, P.et al.Mental health problems among adults in tsunami-affected areas in southern Thailand. JAMA 2006 296(5) 537–548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weathers, F.Litz, B.Herman, D.Huska, J.Keane, T.The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, Validity, and Diagnostic Utility. The Annual Convention of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Paper presentation 1993Google Scholar
Weisaeth, L.European history of psychotraumatology. J Trauma Stress 2002; 15: 443–452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisæth, L.Dyb, G.Heir, T.Disaster medicine and mental health: who, how, when for international and national disasters. Psychiatry 2007; 70: 337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, D.Marmar, C.The impact of event scale – revised.Wilson, J.Keane, T.Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD New York: Guilford Press; 2004 168–189Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.