Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Explaining the industrial transition: a non-Malthusian perspective

  • GEORGE GRANTHAM (a1)
Abstract

The large-scale structure of world economic history exhibits three steady states punctuated by two phase transitions. The first transition arrived with the domestication of plants and animals; the second with the invention of engines capable of converting thermal to mechanical energy for applications in mining, manufacturing, and transportation. Yet, although both transitions led to increases in the absolute size of the economy, they affected the standard of living differently. Whereas the Industrial Revolution resulted in sustained growth in real per capita income for more than two centuries, over nine millennia the Agricultural Revolution spent itself in population growth that left per capita income insignificantly higher, and possibly lower than the level prevailing under hunting and gathering. This pattern raises three fundamental questions in economic history: why did the first great technological transition produce secular stasis in living standards? Why has the second yielded both steady growth in population and rising living standards? What triggered the transition from the stationary agricultural state to the progressive industrial state?

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

F. Audoin-Rouzeau (1995). Compter et mesurer les os animaux. Pour une histoire de l'élévage en Europe de l'Antiquité aux temps modernes. Histoire et mesure 10, pp. 277312.

G. Becker , K. Murphy and R. Tamura (1990). Human capital, fertility and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, pp. 512–37.

B. M. S. Campbell and M. A. Overton (1993). A new perspective on medieval and early modern agriculture: six centuries of Norfolk farming, c. 1250 – c. 1850. Past & Present 141, pp. 38105.

J.-M. Chevet (1993). Les crises démographique en France à la fin du xviie et au xviiie siècle: un essai de mesure. Histoire et mesure 8, pp. 117–44.

G. Clark (2007). Farm wages, population, and economic growth, England 1209–1869. Economic History Review 60 (1), pp. 97135.

R. W. Fogel (2004). Escape from Hunger and Premature Death, 1700–2100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

E. Karakacili (2004). English agrarian labor productivity before the Black Death: a case study. Journal of Economic History 64, pp. 2455.

R. Lee (1987). Population dynamics of human and other animals. Demography 24, p. 450.

R. Lee (1993). Accidental and systematic change in population history: homeostasis in a stochastic setting. Explorations in Economic History 30 (1), pp. 130.

E. A. Nicolini (2007). Was Malthus right? A VAR analysis of economic and demographic interactions in pre-industrial England. European Review of Economic History 11, pp. 99121.

M. J. Stephenson (1988). Wool yields in the medieval economy. Economic History Review 41, pp. 368–91.

E. A. Wrigley (2006). The transition to an advanced organic economy: half a millennium of English agriculture. Economic History Review 59, pp. 435–80.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Review of Economic History
  • ISSN: 1361-4916
  • EISSN: 1474-0044
  • URL: /core/journals/european-review-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 106 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.