Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:55:02.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Posthuman in the Anthropocene: A Look through the Aesthetic Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2016

Jacob Wamberg  and
Mads Rosendahl Thomsen
Jacob Wamberg
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Denmark. E-mail: litmrt@cc.au.dk
Mads Rosendahl Thomsen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Denmark. E-mail: litmrt@cc.au.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The posthuman summons up a complex of both tangible challenges for humanity and a potential shift to a larger, more comprehensive historical perspective on humankind. In this article we will first examine the posthuman in relation to the macro-historical framework of the Anthropocene. Adopting key notions from complexity theory, we argue that the earlier counter-figures of environmental catastrophe (Anthropocene entropy) and corporeal enhancement (transhuman negentropy) should be juxtaposed and blended. Furthermore, we argue for the relevance of a comprehensive aesthetical perspective in a discussion of posthuman challenges. Whereas popular visual culture and many novels illustrate posthuman dilemmas (e.g. the superhero’s oscillation between superhuman and human) in a respect for humanist naturalist norms, avant-garde art performs a posthuman alienation of the earlier negentropic centres of art, a problematization of the human body and mind, that is structurally equivalent to the environmental modification of negentropic rise taking place in the Anthropocene. In a spatial sprawl from immaterial information to material immersion, the autonomous human body and mind, the double apex of organic negentropy, are thus undermined through a dialectics of entropy and order, from abstraction’s indeterminacy to Surrealism’s fragmentation of the body and its interlacing with inorganic things.

Type
Erasmus Lecture
Information
European Review , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 150 - 165
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. Herbrechter, S. (2013 [2009]) Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis (London: Bloomsbury), pp. 33–36.Google Scholar
2. Shelley, M. (1994) Frankenstein: Or the Modern Prometheus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
3. Butler, S. (1872) Erewhon, or Over the Range (London: Trübner).Google Scholar
4. Wells, H.G. (2005) The Time Machine (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
5.Steve Jones suggests that it is decreasing differences in survival and reproduction rates that eventually stopped ’the Darwin machine’. See his lecture ‘Is Human Evolution Over?’, http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/is-human-evolution-over Google Scholar
6. Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W. and Crutzen, P. (2010) The new world of the Anthropocene. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 2228–2231; K. Gibson, D.B. Rose and R. Fincher (2015) Preface. In: K. Gibson, D.B. Rose and R. Fincher (Eds), Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene (Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books), p. v.Google Scholar
7. More, M. (2003) Principles of Extropy (Version 3.11): an evolving framework of values and standards for continuously improving the human condition. Extropy Institute, on https://web.archive.org/web/20131015142449/http://extropy.org/principles.htm Google Scholar
8. Haraway, D. (2015) Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationecene, chthulucene: making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.Google Scholar
9. McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (New York, Toronto and London: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
10. Lovelock, J. (2000 [1979]) Gaia: A New Look at Life at Earth (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
11. Pagels, H.R. (1988) The Dreams of Reason: The Computer and the Rise of the Sciences of Complexity (New York: Bantam Books), pp. 54–70; S. Lloyd and H. Pagels (1988) Complexity as thermodynamic depth. Annals of Physics, 88, 185–213; E. Jaynes (1990) Maxwell’s Demon, H.S. Leff and A.F. Rex (Eds), (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p. 17.Google Scholar
12. Lyotard, J.-F. (1991 [1987]) Can thought go on without a body? The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, trans. G. Bennington and R. Bowlby (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991), pp. 8–23.Google Scholar
13. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1988 [1980]) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi (London: Athlone Press), p. 166.Google Scholar
14.Notions derived from R. Hughes (1991 [1981]) The Shock of the New: Art and the Century of Change (New York: Knopf) and D. Edgerton (2007) The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
15. Roden, D. (2015) Posthuman Life: Philosophy at the Edge of the Human (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
16. Bostrom, N. (2009) The future of humanity. In: Kyrre-Berg et al. (Eds), New Waves in Philosophy and Technology (London: Palgrave-Macmillan), p. 204.Google Scholar
17. Mehlman, M.J. (2012) How close are we to being able to achieve the transhumanist vision? In: K. Lippert-Rasmussen, M.R. Thomsen and J. Wamberg, (Eds), The Posthuman Condition: Ethics, Aesthetics and Politics of Biotechnological Challenges (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), p. 46.Google Scholar
18. Fukuyama, F. (2012) Agency of inevitability: will human beings control their technological future? In K. Lippert-Rasmussen, M.R. Thomsen and J. Wamberg (Eds), The Posthuman Condition: Ethics, Aesthetics and Politics of Biotechnological Challenges (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), p. 159.Google Scholar
19. http://www.nature.com/news/reproductive-medicine-the-power-of-three-1.15253 Google Scholar
20. Sloterdijk, P. (2009 [1999]) Rules for the human zoo: a response to the Letter of Humanism . Trans. M.V. Rorty. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, pp. 12–28.Google Scholar
21. More, M. (2003) Principles of Extropy (Version 3.11): an evolving framework of values and standards for continuously improving the human condition. Extropy Institute, on https://web.archive.org/web/20131015142449/http://extropy.org/principles.htm See also the Extropist Manifesto (2006) http://extropism.tumblr.com/post/393563122/the-extropist-manifesto Google Scholar
22. Ishiguro, K. (2005) Never Let Me Go (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
23. Houellebecq, M. (2000) The Elementary Particles (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
24. Mitchell, D. (2004) Cloud Atlas (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
25. Rosendahl Thomsen, M. (2013) The New Human in Literature: Posthuman Visions of Changes in Body, Mind and Society after 1900 (London: Bloomsbury), pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
26. Huxley, A. (1932) Brave New World (Garden City: Doubleday).Google Scholar
27. Orwell, G. (1961) Nineteen Eighty-Four (New York: Signet Classic), p. 269.Google Scholar
28. Eco, U. (1989 [1962]) The open work in the visual arts. In: The Open Work. Trans. A. Cancogni (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 84–104.Google Scholar
29.For the earliest example of this trend, see J. Deitch (1992) Post Human (Lausanne: FAE Musée d’Art Contemporain).Google Scholar
30. Herbrechter, S. (2013 [2009]) Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis (London: Bloomsbury), pp. 176–177; Stelarc and Orlan: J. Zylinska (Ed.), (2002) The Cyborg Experiments: The Extensions of the Body in the Media Age (London and New York: Continuum); Kac: C. Wolfe (2010) What is Posthumanism? (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 158–167.Google Scholar
31. Biro, M. (2009) The Dada Cyborg: Visions of the New Human in Weimar Berlin (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
32. Danto, A.C. (1986) The end of art. In The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 111.Google Scholar
33. Sedlmayr, H. (1985 [1948]) Verlust der Mitte: Die bildende Kunst des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts als Symptom und Symbol der Zeit (Frankfurt a.M.: Ullstein).Google Scholar
34. Burnham, J. (1987 [1967]) Beyond Modern Sculpture: The Effects of Science and Technology on the Sculpture of this Century (New York: George Braziller).Google Scholar
35. Arnheim, R. (1971) Entropy and Art: An Essay on Disorder and Order (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
36. Wamberg, J. (2009 [2005]) Landscape as World Picture: Tracing Cultural Evolution in Images (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), vol. 2, pp. 84–89.Google Scholar
37. Burke, E. (1759 [1757]) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (London: R. and J. Dodsley).Google Scholar
38.For this genealogy, without a philosophical framing, cf. R. Rosenblum (1975) Modern Painting and the Northern Romantic Tradition: Friedrich to Rothko (London: Thames and Hudson).Google Scholar
39.J. Ortega y Gasset, José (1948 [1925]) The Dehumanization of Art, and Notes on the Novel. Trans. H. Weyl (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
40. Smithson, R. (1979 [1967]) Entropy and the new monuments. In: N. Holt, (Ed.), The Writings of Robert Smithson (New York: New University Press), pp. 9–18.Google Scholar