Skip to main content Accessibility help

Legal Aspects of Research with Human Embryonic Stem Cells

  • Jochen Taupitz (a1)


Research with human embryonic stem cells (HESC) is very much disputed from an ethical point of view as it requires the destruction of the embryo to derive the stem cells. The legal situation in Europe is heterogeneous. This article gives an overview of the current debate on this topic by outlining the international regulations and the national legislation in the European Union. It is shown that the different legal positions are like an in vivo experiment for contrasting solutions. Furthermore, the legal situation in Germany is examined in more detail and with it the effectiveness and the constitutionality of the requirements.



Hide All
2. See also Druml, C. (2009) Stem cell research: toward greater unity in Europe. Cell, 139, pp. 649651, p. 651.
3.Loi no 2013-715 du 6 août 2013.
4.European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies Opinion No. 15 of 2000, p. 11.
5. Trips-Hebert, R. (2009) Hybrid-Embryonen – Herausforderung für den Gesetzgeber?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 42, pp. 8082, p. 80.
6. Haimes, E., Porz, R., Scully, J. and Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2008) So, what is an embryo? A comparative study of the view of those asked to donate embryos for hESC research in the UK and Switzerland. New Genetics and Society, 27, pp. 113126, p. 114.
7. German National Ethics Council (2001) The import of human embryonic stem cells, p. 30.
8. German Ethics Council (2014) Stem cell research – new challenges for the ban on cloning and treatment of artificially created germ cells?
9. Kloepfer, M. (2002) Humangentechnik als Verfassungsfrage. JuristenZeitung, 57, pp. 417428, p. 426.
10. Dederer, H.-G. (2003) Hochrangigkeit von Zielen der Stammzellforschung. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik, 8, pp. 305311, p. 308.
11. Brewe, M. (2006) Embryonenschutz und Stammzellengesetz (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), p. 213.
12. Fassbender, K. (2003) Der Schutz des Embryos und die Humangenetik: Zur Verfassungsmäßigkeit des neuen Stammzellengesetzes und des Embryonenschutzgesetzes im Lichte des einschlägigen Arzthaftungsrechts. Medizinrecht, 21, pp. 279286, p. 283.
13. Klopfer, K. (2006) Verfassungsrechtliche Probleme der Forschung an humanen und pluripotenten embryonalen Stammzellen und ihre Würdigung im Stammzellgesetz (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), pp. 8586.
14. Spickhoff, A. (2014) Medizinrecht, 2. Aufl. (München: C.H. Beck), p. 2794.
15. German Parliament (2002) BT-Drucksache 14/8394, p. 7.
16. Dederer, H.-G. (2012) Stammzellengesetz (Baden-Baden: Nomos) Einleitung (introduction), marginal number 16.
17. Taupitz, J. (2010) The German Stem Cell Act. German Law Journal, 11, pp. 13731392, p. 1385.
18. German Parliament (2008) BT-Drucksache 16/7981.
19.Eleventh Report of the Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research, p. 9.
20. Günther, H.L., Taupitz, J. and Kaiser, P. (2014) Embryonenschutzgesetz: Juristischer Kommentar mit medizinisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Einführung, 2. Aufl., J. Taupitz (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer), p. 201.
21. Taupitz, J. (2003) Alternativlosigkeit als Voraussetzung der Forschung mit embryonalen Stammzellen. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik, 8, pp. 335351, p. 345.
22.Twelfth Report of the Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research, p. 10.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed