1. Kostakopoulou, D. (2009) The area of freedom, security and justice and the political morality of migration and integration. In: H. Lindahl (Ed.), A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Fault Lines of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Oxford: Hart Highlights), pp. 185–208; A. Etzioni (2005) How Patriotic is the Patriot Act? Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (New York, London: Routledge), pp. 9–27; Ch. Eckes (2011) The legal framework of the European Union’s counter-terrorist policies. Full of good intentions? In: Ch. Eckes and T. Konstadinides (Eds), Crime within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 127–158; J. Angwin (2014) Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security, and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance (New York: Macmillan), pp. 37–44.
3. Matlary, J.H. (2009) European Union Security Dynamics In the New National Interest (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 15–39; S. Léonard and Ch. Kaunert (2013) Introduction – beyond EU counter-terrorism cooperation: European security, terrorism and intelligence. In: S. Léonard and Ch. Kaunert (Eds), European Security, Terrorism and Intelligence Tackling New Security Challenges in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1–16.
4. Ivancea, T.I. and Baltes, L. (2011) European security and defence dimension, general aspects. Land Forces Academy Review, 16(2), pp. 156–159; N. Nita and M.C. Bogea (2013) The most important challenges of Romania for the sustainable development of the freedom, security and justice space in the European Union. Acta Universitatis George Bacovia, 2(2), pp. 24–36; M. Kornprobst (2015) Building agreements upon agreements: The European Union and grand strategy. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), p. 267; M. Kornprobst (2013) European Union strategy for cyber security. Military Technology, 37(3), p. 58.
6. The European Union increasingly assumes the role of an international entity, whose role extends beyond the geographical reach of member countries. This is, first, due to the same kind of undertaken missions; second, it is due to the neighbourhood policy and assistance for the development. Rouet, G. (2014) Turbulences, European neighbourhood policy and European identity. Politické Vedy, 2, pp. 9–27.
7. Górka, M. (2016) Freedom or security? Contribution to the discussion on the example of the law on anti-terrorist operations on 10 June 2016. e-Politikon, 19, available at: http://oapuw.pl/e-politikon (accessed 10 October 2016).
8. Ciorciari, J.D. and Ch. Weiss, J (2016) Nationalist protests, government responses, and the risk of escalation in interstate disputes. Security Studies, 25(3), pp. 546–583.
9. Olsen, G.R. (2015) After Afghanistan: The European Union as security provider in Africa. Global Society, 29(2), pp. 227–242.
10. Banks, Ch.P. and Tauber, S. (2014) U.S. District Court decision-making in USA PATRIOT Act cases after September 11. Justice System Journal, 35(2), pp. 139–161; B.E. Gronbeck (2014) The USA Patriot Act: Coming to terms with silenced voices. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 11(2), pp. 37–48.
11. Byman, D. (2016) The Islamic State’s European front. International New York Times, 24 March 2016, p. 8.
13. Carter, J.G. and Carter, D.L. (2012) Law enforcement intelligence: implications for self-radicalized terrorism. Police Practice and Research, 13(2), . 138–154.
14. Zegart, A.B. (2006) An empirical analysis of failed intelligence reforms before September 11. Political Science Quarterly, 121(1), pp. 33–60; S. Marrin (2011) The 9/11 terrorist attacks: A failure of policy not strategic intelligence analysis. Intelligence and National Security, 26(2-3), pp. 182–202.
16. Donohue, L.K. (2005) Security and freedom on the fulcrum. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(1-2), . 69–87.