Skip to main content Accessibility help

On the Brout–Englert–Higgs–Guralnik–Hagen–Kibble Mechanism in Quantum Gravity

  • Gerard ‘t Hooft (a1)


Local gauge invariance can materialise in different ways in theories for quantised elementary particles. It is less well-known, however, that a quite similar situation also occurs in the Einstein–Hilbert formalism for the gravitational forces. This may have important consequences for quantum theory. At first sight one may even think that it renders gravity renormalisable, just as happens in local gauge theories, but in gravity the truth is more puzzling.



Hide All
1. Yang, C.N. and Mills, R.L. (1954) Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance. Physical Review, 96, p. 191. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev96.191.
2. Shaw, R. (1955) The problem of particle types and other contributions to the theory of elementary particles. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (unpublished).
3. Nambu, Y. (1960) Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity. Physical Review, 117, p. 648. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.117.648.
4. Goldstone, J. (1961) Field theories with ‘superconductor’ solutions. Nuovo Cimento, 19, p. 154. doi: 10.1007/BF02812722.
5. Higgs, P.W. (1964) Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields. Physics Letters, 12, p. 132. doi: 10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9.
6. Higgs, P.W. (1964) Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons. Physical Review Letters, 13, p. 508. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508.
7. Englert, F. and Brout, R. (1964) Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons. Physical Review Letters, 13, p. 321. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321.
8. Guralnik, G.S., Hagen, C.R. and Kibble, T.W.B. (1964) Global conservation laws and massless particles. Physical Review Letters, 13, p. 585. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585.
9. Anderson, P.W. (1963) Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass. Physical Review, 130, p. 439. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.130.439.
10. Faddeev, L. (2002) Mass in quantum Yang–Mills theory (comment on a Clay millennium problem). Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series, 33, 201. doi: 10.1007/s005740200009.
11. ‘t Hooft, G. (2015) New physics is needed to understand black holes, or renormalization of the gravitational force in analogy with the electroweak theory. Lectures at the Erice International School of Subnuclear Physics, 26–27 June 2015 (unpublished).
12. ‘t Hooft, G. (2017) Local conformal symmetry in black holes, standard model, and quantum gravity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 26, p. 1730006. doi: 10.1142/S0218271817300063.
13. Mannheim, P.D. (2012) Making the case for conformal gravity. Foundations of Physics, 42, p. 388. doi: 10.1007/s10701-011-9608-6.
14. Mannheim, P.D. (2016) Extension of the CPT theorem to non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and unstable states. Physics Letters B, 753, p. 288. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.033.
15. Lee, T.D. and Wick, G.C. (1969) Negative metric and the unitarity of the S-matrix. Nuclear Physics B, 9, p. 209. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(69)90098-4.
16. ‘t Hooft, G. (2016) The firewall transformation for black holes and some of its implications. Foundations of Physics, 47, p. 1503. doi: 10.1007/s10701-017-0122-3.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed