Skip to main content
×
Home

DIFFERENT WAYS TO CUT A CAKE: COMPARING EXPERT-BASED AND STATISTICAL TYPOLOGIES TO TARGET SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES, A CASE-STUDY IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA

  • DAVID BERRE (a1) (a2), FRÉDÉRIC BAUDRON (a3), MENALE KASSIE (a1), PETER CRAUFURD (a1) and SANTIAGO LOPEZ-RIDAURA (a4)...
Summary
SUMMARY

Understanding farm diversity is essential to delineate recommendation domains for new technologies, but diversity is a subjective concept, and can be described differently depending on the way it is perceived. Historically, new technologies have been targeted primarily based on agro-ecological conditions, largely ignoring socioeconomic conditions. Based on 273 farm households' surveys in Ethiopia, we compare two approaches for the delineation of farm type recommendation domains for crop and livestock technologies: one based on expert knowledge and one based on statistical methods. The expert-based typology used a simple discriminant key for stakeholders in the field to define four farm types based on Tropical Livestock Unit, total cultivated surface and the ratio of these two indicators. This simple key took only a few minutes to make inferences about the potential of adoption of crop and livestock technologies. The PCA-HC analysis included a greater number of variables describing the farm (land use, household size, cattle, fertilizer, off-farm work, hiring labour, production). This analysis emphasized the multi-dimensional potential of such a statistical approach and, in principle, its usefulness to grasp the full complexity of farming systems to identify their needs in crop and livestock technologies. A sub-sampling approach was used to test the impact of data selection on the diversity represented in the statistical approach. Our results show that diversity structure is significantly impacted according to the choice of a sub-sample of 15 of the 20 variables available. This paper shows the complementarity of the two approaches and demonstrates the influence of data selection within large baseline data sets on the total diversity represented in the clusters identified.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      DIFFERENT WAYS TO CUT A CAKE: COMPARING EXPERT-BASED AND STATISTICAL TYPOLOGIES TO TARGET SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES, A CASE-STUDY IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      DIFFERENT WAYS TO CUT A CAKE: COMPARING EXPERT-BASED AND STATISTICAL TYPOLOGIES TO TARGET SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES, A CASE-STUDY IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      DIFFERENT WAYS TO CUT A CAKE: COMPARING EXPERT-BASED AND STATISTICAL TYPOLOGIES TO TARGET SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES, A CASE-STUDY IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
††Corresponding author. Email: david.berre@cirad.fr
References
Hide All
Alvarez S., Paas W., Descheemaeker K., Tittonell P. and Groot J. C. J. (2014). Constructing typologies, a way to deal with farm diversity: General guidelines for the Humidtropics. Report for the CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics. Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
Duriaux Chavarria J.-Y. (2014). Energy flows in the farming systems of Southern Ethiopia: Implications for sustainable intensification. MSc thesis. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University.
Falconnier G., Descheemaeker K., Van Mourik T. A., Sanogo O. M. and Giller K. E. (2015). Understanding farm trajectories and development pathways: Two decades of change in southern Mali. Agricultural Systems 139:210222.
Feleke S. and Zegeye T. (2006). Adoption of improved maize varieties in Southern Ethiopia: Factors and strategy options. Food Policy 31:442457.
Headey D., Dereje M. and Taffesse A. S. (2014). Land constraints and agricultural intensification in Ethiopia: A village-level analysis of high-potential areas. Food Policy 48:129141.
Herrero M., Thornton P. K., Notenbaert A. M., Wood S., Msangi S., Freeman H. A., Bossio D., Dixon J., Peters M., van de Steeg J., Lynam J., Parthasarathy R., Macmillan S., Gerard B., McDermott J., Seré C. and Rosegrant M. (2010). Smart investments in sustainable food production: Revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science 327:822825.
Hubert M., Rousseeuw P. and Verdonck T. (2009). Robust PCA for skewed data and its outlier map. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53:22642274.
Jollivet M. (1965). D'une méthode typologique pour l’étude des sociétés rurales. Revue Française de Sociologie 6 (1):3354.
Landais E. (1996). Typologies d'exploitations agricoles. Nouvelles questions, nouvelles methods. Economie Rurale 236:315.
Landais E. (1998). Modelling farm diversity – New approaches to typology building in France. Agricultural Systems 58 (4):505527.
Lopez-Ridaura S. and Tittonell P. (2011). Coping with heterogeneity. Typologies for agricultural research and development. 5th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture & 3rd Farming Systems Design Conference, Brisbane, Australie, 26–29 September 2011.
Pacini G. G., Coluccis D., Baudron F., Righi E., Corbeels M., Tittonell P. and Stefanini F. M. (2013). Combining multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis to describe the diversity of rural households. Experimental Agriculture 50:122.
Perrot C. and Landais E. (1993). Exploitations agricoles: Pourquoi poursuivre la recherché sur les methods typologiques. Les Cahiers de la Recherche Agronomique 33:1323.
Sarbu C. and Pop H. F. (2005). Principal component analysis versus fuzzy principal component analysis-a casestudy: The quality of Danube water (1985–1996). Talanta 65:12151220.
Thioulouse J., Chessel D., Dol_edec S. and Olivier J. M. (1997). ADE-4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing. 7:7583.
Valbuena D., Groot J. C. J., Mukalama J., Gerard B. and Tittonell P. (2015). Improving rural livelihoods as a “moving target”: trajectories of change in smallholder farming systems of Western Kenya. Regional Environmental Change 15:13951407.
Von Braun J. and Olofinbiyi T. (2007). Famine and food insecurity in Ethiopia. Food policy for developing countries: The role of government in the global food system. Cornell University.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Experimental Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0014-4797
  • EISSN: 1469-4441
  • URL: /core/journals/experimental-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 200 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 254 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th November 2016 - 11th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.