Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Photosynthesis and Transpiration of Crops

  • J. L. Monteith (a1)
Abstract
Summary

When a leaf absorbs radiant energy, only a small fraction is stored chemically in photosynthesis. In sunlight, this fraction is at most one-fifth of the energy in the visible spectrum, decreasing with increasing light intensity because of the finite resistance to the diffusion of carbon dioxide through the leaf to the chloroplasts. Energy absorbed but not stored in photosynthesis is dissipated by transpiration and convection.

The potential or maximum photosynthesis of a crop canopy can be estimated from a set of six parameters describing the photosynthesis-light curve of single leaves, the arrangement of leaves in the canopy, and radiation climate. Comparing estimates of potential photosynthesis with measurements of carbon dioxide exchange over a field of sugar beet, the estimated rate of respiration was 2 gm carbohydrate per m2 leaf area per day, equivalent to 44 per cent of gross photosynthesis over the whole growing season. Over the season, the foliage lost 34 per cent of incident radiation by transmission to the soil.

The potential rate of transpiration can be found from Penman's formula assuming values of external (aerodynamic) and internal (mainly stomatal) resistance for the canopy as a whole. In south-east England, the energy for potential transpiration is almost equal to net heat H in summer and is therefore about half the energy of incoming solar radiation. For a real crop of grass subject to moisture stress, transpiration was less than the potential rate at about 0·8 H on average and 0·3 H in very dry weather.

During the summer, cumulative photosynthesis increases linearly with cumulative transpiration to give a production ratio (gross photosynthesis/transpiration) of 1/100 in the Thames Valley and 1/200 in the Sacramento Valley. The production ratio is expected to change with crop type as well as with climate.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Gaastra (1963). In ‘Environmental Control of Plant Growth’ (Ed. Evans). New York: Academic Press.

P. Holmgren , P. G. Jarvis & M. S. Jarvis (1965). Physiologia Pl. 18, 557.

J. L. Monteith (1963). In ‘Environmental Control of Plant Growth’ (Ed. Evans). New York: Academic Press.

J. L. Monteith & G. Szeicz (1959). Q. Jl R. met. Soc. 86, 205.

H. L. Penman (1948). Proc. R. Soc. A.193, 120.

H. L. Penman (1955). Q.Jl R. met. Soc. 81, 507.

H. L. Penman (1962). J. agric. Sci. 58, 349.

P. E. Waggoner , J. L. Monteith & G. Szeicz (1964). Nature, 201, 97.

D. J. Watson & K-I. Hayashi (1965). New Phytol. 64, 38.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Experimental Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0014-4797
  • EISSN: 1469-4441
  • URL: /core/journals/experimental-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×