Skip to main content Accessibility help

INNOVATION PLATFORMS IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT: Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes



Innovation platforms are fast becoming part of the mantra of agricultural research for development projects and programmes. Their basic tenet is that stakeholders depend on one another to achieve agricultural development outcomes, and hence need a space where they can learn, negotiate and coordinate to overcome challenges and capture opportunities through a facilitated innovation process. Although much has been written on how to implement and facilitate innovation platforms efficiently, few studies support ex-ante appraisal of when and for what purpose innovation platforms provide an appropriate mechanism for achieving development outcomes, and what kinds of human and financial resource investments and enabling environments are required. Without these insights, innovation platforms run the risk of being promoted as a panacea for all problems in the agricultural sector. This study makes clear that not all constraints will require innovation platforms and, if there is a simpler and cheaper alternative, that should be considered first. Based on the review of critical design principles and plausible outcomes of innovation platforms, this study provides a decision support tool for research, development and funding agencies that can enhance more critical thinking about the purposes and conditions under which innovation platforms can contribute to achieving agricultural development outcomes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Adane-Mariami, Z., Cadilhon, J. J. and Werthmann, C. (2015). Impact of innovation platforms on marketing relationships: The case of Volta Basin integrated crop-livestock value chains in Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 10 (4):110.
Adekunle, A. A., Fatunbi, A. O. and Jones, M. P. (2010). How to set up an Innovation Platform. A concept guide for the Sub-Saharan African Challenge Program (SSA CP). Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), Accra, Ghana. Available at:
Andres, C., Mandloi, L. S. and Bhullar, G. S. (2016). Sustaining the supply of organic white gold. In Innovation Platforms for Agricultural Development. Evaluating the Mature Innovation Platforms Landscape, 133150 (Eds Dror, I., Cadilhon, J.-J., Schut, M., Misiko, M. and Maheshwari, S.). London, UK: Routledge.
Boogaard, B., Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., Duncan, A. and Cullen, B. (2013). Critical issues for reflection when designing and implementing research for development in innovation platforms. Report for the CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humidtropics. 42: Knowledge, Technology & Innovation Group (KTI), Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Brouwer, H., Hiemstra, W., Van Vugt, S. and Walters, H. (2013). Analysing stakeholder power dynamics in multi-stakeholder processes: Insights of practice from Africa and Asia. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9 (3):1131.
Brouwer, H. and Woodhill, J. (2016). The MSP Guide: How to Design and Facilitate Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships, 2nd edn. Warwickshire, UK: Wageningen University & Research, CDI The Netherlands, and Practical Action Publishing. Available at: <>.
Buerkler, E. (2013). Critical success factors for joint innovation: Experiences from a New Zealand innovation platform. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 18 (2):23.
Buizer, D. (2016). The costs of Humidtropics Innovation Platforms in Uganda. MSc-thesis Wageningen University, Development Economics, pp 20.
Cadilhon, J. (2013a). A conceptual framework to evaluate the impact of innovation platforms on agrifood value chains development. In Paper Prepared for the 138 EAAE Seminar on Pro-Poor Innovations in Food Supply Chains. Ghent, Belgium.
Cadilhon, J.-J. (2013b). The functions of facilitation in multi-stakeholder learning: Lessons learned from capacity development on value chains management in innovation platforms in Burkina Faso and Ghana. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9 (3):174181.
Cadilhon, J.-J., Diep, P. N. and Maass, B. L. (2016). The Tanga dairy platform: Fostering innovations for more efficient dairy chain coordination in Tanzania. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 7 (2):8191.
Chave, M., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Noel, Y. and Noël, Y. (2012). Towards agricultural innovation systems: Designing an operational interface. Outlook on Agriculture 41 (2):8186.
Cullen, B., Lema, Z., Tucker, J., Snyder, K. and Duncan, A. J. (2014a). Navigating power dynamics in innovation platforms: Lessons from the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. In Innovation in Smallholder Farming in Africa: Recent Advances and Recommendations: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Agricultural Innovation Systems in Africa (AISA) (Eds Triomphe, B., Waters-Bayer, A., Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Cullen, B., Kamau, G. and Borgne, E. Le). Nairobi, Kenya, 29–31 May 2013. Montpellier, France: CIRAD, 7984.
Cullen, B., Tucker, J., Snyder, K., Lema, Z. and Duncan, A. (2014b). An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management. Innovation and Development 4 (2):259275.
Cullen, B., Tucker, J. and Tui, S. H.-K. (2013). Power dynamics and representation in innovation platforms. Innovation Platforms Practice Brief 4. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.
Davies, J., Maru, Y., Hall, A., Abdourhamane, I. K., Adegbidi, A., Carberry, P., Dorai, K., Ennin, S. A., Etwire, P. M., McMillan, L., Njoya, A., Ouedraogo, S., Traoré, A., Traoré-Gué, N. J. and Watson, I. (2018). Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa. Agricultural Systems. Available at:
Devaux, A., Andrade-Piedra, J., Horton, D., Ordinola, M., Thiele, G., Thomann, A. and Velasco, C. (2010). Brokering innovation for sustainable development: the Papa Andina case. In ILAC Working Paper, No. 12., 32.
Dror, I., Cadilhon, J.-J., Schut, M., Misiko, M. and Maheshwari, S. (2016). Innovation Platforms for Agricultural Development. Evaluating the Mature Innovation Platforms Landscape. London, UK: Routledge.
Duncan, A. J., Teufel, N., Ravichandran, T., Hendrickx, S. and Ballantyne, P. G. (2015). Innovation platforms to improve smallholder dairying at scale: Experiences from the MilkIT project in India and Tanzania. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies 34 (0):114.
Faysse, N. (2006). Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi-stakeholder platforms. Natural Resources Forum 30 (3):219229.
Fichter, K. (2009). Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in Open Innovation. R&D Management 39 (4):357371.
Fleming, L. and Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science 18 (2):165180.
Flor, R., Leeuwis, C., Maat, H. and Gummert, M. (2016). Rice postharvest learning alliance in Cambodia: Comparison of assumptions and implementation of a network approach. Journal of Development Effectiveness 8:489507.
Francis, J., Mytelka, L., van Huis, A. and Röling, N. (Eds) (2016). Innovation Systems: Towards Effective Strategies in Support of Smallholder Farmers. Wageningen, the Netherlands: CTA, CoS, Wageningen University and Research. Available at:
Glin, L. G., Fatunbi, A. O., Kouévi, A. and Togbé, E. (2016). Facilitation strategies for managing Research for Development in innovation platforms. Accra, Ghana: Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA).
Hall, A. (2006). Public–private partnerships in an agricultural system of innovation: Concepts and challenges. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 5:320.
Head, B. W. (2008). Assessing network-based collaborations: effectiveness for whom?. Public Management Review 10 (6):733749.
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413432.
Hendrickx, S., Ballantyne, P., Duncan, A., Teufel, N. and Ravichandran, T. (2015). Scaling and innovation platforms. In Innovation platforms practice brief 13. Available at:
Hermans, F. P., Haarmann, W. F. and Dagevos, J. L. M. M. (2011). Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development. Regional Environmental Change 11 (4):805815.
Hermans, F., Sartas, M., van Schagen, B., van Asten, P. and Schut, M. (2017). Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLoS ONE 12 (2). Available at:
Hinnou, L. C., Mongbo, R. L., Kamanda, J. and Sanyang, S. (2018). Innovation platform and governance of local rice value chains in Benin: Between game of power and internal democracy?. Cogent Food & Agriculture 4 (1):1433346.
Hounkonnou, D., Brouwers, J., van Huis, A., Jiggins, J., Kossou, D., Röling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, O. and Traoré, M. (in press). Triggering regime change: A comparative analysis of the performance of innovation platforms that attempted to change the institutional context for nine agricultural domains in West Africa. Agricultural Systems. Available at:
Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, E. S., Röling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traoré, M. and Van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 108 (5):7483.
IFAD (1998). Report and Recommendation of the President on the Technical Assistance Grant to the FAO for the East African Subregional Pilot Project for FFS in Kenya, Republic of Tanzania and Uganda. Rome, Italy: International Fund for Agriculture and Development (IFAD).
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems 118 (0):6577.
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2017). Supporting smallholder commercialisation by enhancing integrated coordination in agrifood value chains: Experiences with dairy hubs in Kenya. Experimental Agriculture 53 (2):269287.
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C. and Hall, A. (2011). Beyond knowledge brokering: An exploratory study on innovation intermediaries in an evolving smallholder agricultural system in Kenya. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 7 (1):84108.
Klerkx, L., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Adu-Acheampong, R., Saïdou, A., Zannou, E. T., Soumano, L., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Van Paassen, A. and Nederlof, S. (2013). Looking at agricultural innovation platforms through an innovation champion lens. An analysis of three cases in West Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 42 (3):185192.
Klerkx, L., Hall, A. and Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer?. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8 (5–6):409438.
Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C. and Kilelu, C. (2012). Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: Towards innovation system facilitation. IDS Bulletin 43 (5):5360.
Klijn, E. H. and Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public–private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money and Management 23 (3):137146.
Lamers, D., Schut, M., Klerkx, L. and van Asten, P. (2017). Compositional dynamics of multi-level innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Science and Public Policy 44 (6):739752.
Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change 31 (5):931959.
Lundy, M., Gottret, M. V. and Ashby, J. (2005). Learning alliances: An approach for building multi-stakeholder innovation systems. In ILAC Brief 8Rome: Bioversity.
Madzudzo, E. (2011). Role of brokerage in evolving innovation systems: A case of the fodder innovation project in Nigeria. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17 (2015):195210.
Makini, F. W., Kamau, G. M., Makelo, M. N., Adekunle, W., Mburathi, G. K., Misiko, M., Pali, P. and Dixon, J. (2013). Operational Field Guide for Developing and Managing Local Agricultural Innovation Platforms. Nairobi: KARI and ACIAR.
McHugh, M., Shi, Y., McClellan, S. R., Shortell, S. M., Fareed, N., Harvey, J., Ramsay, P. and Casalino, L. P. (2016). Using multi-stakeholder alliances to accelerate the adoption of health information technology by physician practices. Healthc (Amst) 4 (2):8691.
Messely, L., Rogge, E. and Dessein, J. (2013). Using the rural web in dialogue with regional stakeholders. Journal of Rural Studies 32 (0):400410.
Minh, T. T., Friederichsen, R., Neef, A. and Hoffmann, V. (2014). Niche action and system harmonization for institutional change: Prospects for demand-driven agricultural extension in Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies 36 (0):273284.
Misiko, M., Mundy, P. and Ericksen, P. (2013). Innovation platforms to support natural resource management. Innovation Platforms Practice Brief 11. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.
Nederlof, E. S. and Pyburn, R. (2012). One Finger Cannot Lift a Rock: Facilitating Innovation Platforms to Trigger Institutional Change in West Africa. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.
Nederlof, S., Wongtschowski, M. and van der Lee, F. (Eds) (2011). Putting Heads Together. Agricultural Innovation Platform in Practice. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KIT Publishers.
Neef, A. and Neubert, D. (2011). Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (2):179194.
Ngwenya, H. and Hagmann, J. (2011). Making innovation systems work in practice: experiences in integrating innovation, social learning and knowledge in innovation platforms. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 7 (1):109124.
OECD (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Ottosson, S. (2003). Participation action research: A key to improved knowledge of management. Technovation 23 (2):8794.
Pamuk, H., Bulte, E. and Adekunle, A. A. (2014). Do decentralized innovation systems promote agricultural technology adoptionα Experimental evidence from Africa. Food Policy 44:227236.
Pham, N. D., Cadilhon, J. J. and Maass, B. L. (2015). Field testing a conceptual framework for innovation platform impact assessment: The case of MilkIT dairy platforms in Tanga region, Tanzania. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 81 (1):5863.
Poulton, C. and Macartney, J. (2012). Can public–private partnerships leverage private investment in agricultural value chains in Africa? a preliminary review. World Development 40 (1):96109.
Quizon, J., Feder, G. and Murgai, R. (2015). Fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: the case of the farmer field school approach – Supplementary remarks. Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 1:7375.
Rola, A. C., Jamias, S. B. and Quizon, J. B. (2002). Do farmer field school graduates retain and share what they learn: An investigation in Iloilo, Philippines. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 9:6576.
Ruttan, L. (2008). Economic heterogeneity and the commons: Effects on collective action and collective goods provisioning. World Development 36 (5):969985.
Sanyang, S., Pyburn, R., Mur, R. and Audet-Belanger, G. (Eds) (2014). Against the Grain and to the Roots: Maize and Cassava Innovation Platforms in West and Central Africa. Arnhem, the Netherlands: LM Publishers.
Sanyang, S., Taonda, S. J.-B., Kuiseu, J., Coulibaly, N. T. and Konaté, L. (2016). A paradigm shift in African agricultural research for development: The role of innovation platforms. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 14 (2):187213.
Sartas, M., Schut, M. and Leeuwis, C. (2017). Learning System for Agricultural Research for Development (LESARD): Documenting, reporting, and analysis of performance factors in multi-stakeholder processes. In Sustainable Intensification in Smallholder Agriculture: An Integrated Systems Research Approach (Eds Ӧborn, I., Vanlauwe, B., Phillips, M., Thomas, R., Brooijmans, W. and Atta-Krah, K.). London, UK: Earthscan.
Schut, M., Andersson, J. A., Dror, I., Kamanda, J., Sartas, M., Mur, R., Kassam, S., Brouwer, H., Stoian, D., Devaux, A., Velasco, C., Gramzow, A., Dubois, T., Flor, R. J., Gummert, M., Buizer, D., McDougall, C., Davis, K., Homann-Kee Tui, S. and Lundy, M. (2017a). Guidelines for Innovation Platforms in Agricultural Research for Development. Decision support for research, development and funding agencies on how to design, budget and implement impactful Innovation Platforms. Kigali, Rwanda: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Wageningen University (WUR) under the CGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas (RTB).
Schut, M., Cadilhon, J.-J., Misiko, M. and Dror, I. (2018). Do mature innovation platforms make a difference in agricultural research for development? A meta-analysis of case studies. Experimental Agriculture 54 (1):96119.
Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Sartas, M., Lamers, D., Mc Campbell, M., Ogbonna, I., Kaushik, P., Atta-Krah, K. and Leeuwis, C. (2016a). Innovation platforms: experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Experimental Agriculture 52 (4):537561.
Schut, M., Leeuwis, C. and van Paassen, A. (2013). Ex ante scale dynamics analysis in the policy debate on sustainable biofuels in Mozambique. Ecology and Society 18 (1):16. [online] URL:
Schut, M., Leeuwis, C., van Paassen, A. and Lerner, A. (2011). Knowledge and innovation management in the policy debate on biofuel sustainability in Mozambique: What roles for researchers?. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 7 (1):4564.
Schut, M., van Asten, P., Okafor, C., Hicintuka, C., Mapatano, S., Nabahungu, N. L., Kagabo, D., Muchunguzi, P., Njukwe, E., Dontsop-Nguezet, P. M., Sartas, M. and Vanlauwe, B. (2016b). Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems in the Central African highlands: The need for institutional innovation. Agricultural Systems 145:165176.
Schut, M., van Paassen, A., Leeuwis, C. and Klerkx, L. (2014). Towards dynamic research configurations. A framework for reflection on the contribution of research to policy and innovation processes. Science and Public Policy 41 (2014):207218.
Spielman, D. J. and von Grebmer, K. (2006). Public–private partnerships in international agricultural research: An analysis of constraints. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (2):291300.
Steins, N. A. and Edwards, V. M. (1999). Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources. Agriculture and Human Values 16 (3):241255.
Swaans, K., Boogaard, B., Bendapudi, R., Taye, H., Hendrickx, S. and Klerkx, L. (2014). Operationalizing inclusive innovation: Lessons from innovation platforms in livestock value chains in India and Mozambique. Innovation and Development 4 (2):239257.
Swaans, K., Cullen, B., Rooyen, A. V., Adekunle, A., Ngwenya, H., Lema, Z. and Nederlof, S. (2013a). Dealing with critical challenges in African innovation platforms: Lessons for facilitation. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9 (3):116135.
Swaans, K., Cullen, B., van Rooyen, A., Adekunle, A., Ngwenya, H., Lema, Z. and Nederlof, S. (2013b). Dealing with critical challenges in African innovation platforms: Lessons for facilitation. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9 (3):116135.
Swaans, K., Puskur, R., Taye, H. and Haile, A. G. (2013c). A monitoring and evaluation framework to assess the performance of innovation platforms in the context of livestock value chains. In ILRI Discussion Paper 24, Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute.
Tenywa, M. M., Rao, K. P. C., Tukahirwa, J. B., Buruchara, R., Adekunle, A. A., Mugabe, J., Wanjiku, C., Mutabazi, S., Fungo, B., Kashaija, N. I. M., Pali, P., Mapatano, S., Ngaboyisonga, C., Farrow, A., Njuki, J. and Abenakyo, A. (2011). Agricultural innovation platform as a tool for development oriented research: Lessons and challenges in the formation and operationalization. Learning Publics Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Studies 2 (1):117146.
Thiele, G., Devaux, A., Reinoso, I., Pico, H., Montesdeoca, F., Pumisacho, M., Andrade-Piedra, J., Velasco, C., Flores, P., Esprella, R., Thomann, A., Manrique, K. and Horton, D. (2011). Multi-stakeholder platforms for linking small farmers to value chains: Evidence from the Andes. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9 (3):423433.
Tucker, J., Schut, M. and Klerkx, L. (2013). Linking action at different levels through innovation platforms. Innovation Platforms Practice Brief 9. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI: 4.
Van der Meer, K. (Ed) (2002). Public–Private Cooperation in Agricultural Research: Examples From the Netherlands. Wallingford: CABI.
van Paassen, A., Klerkx, L., Adu-Acheampong, R., Adjei-Nsiah, S. and Zannoue, E. (2014). Agricultural innovation platforms in West Africa. How does strategic institutional entrepreneurship unfold in different value chain contexts?. Outlook on Agriculture 43 (3):193200.
van Rooyen, A. F., Ramshaw, P., Moyo, M., Stirzaker, R. and Bjornlund, H. (2017). Theory and application of agricultural innovation platforms for improved irrigation scheme management in Southern Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33 (5):804823.
Warner, J. (2006). Multi-stakeholder platforms: integrating society in water resource management?. Ambiente & Sociedade VIII (2):120.
Wigboldus, S., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., Schut, M., Muilerman, S. and Jochemsen, H. (2016). Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36 (3):120.
Woomer, P. L., Mulei, W. and Kaleha, C. (2016). Humidtropics innovation platform case study. WeRATE operations in West Kenya. In Innovation Platforms for Agricultural Development. Evaluating the Mature Innovation Platforms Landscape, 98116 (Eds Dror, I., Cadilhon, J.-J., Schut, M., Misiko, M. and Maheshwari, S.). London, UK: Routledge.
World Bank (2006). Enhancing agricultural innovation: how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. 135 Washington DC, USA: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Experimental Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0014-4797
  • EISSN: 1469-4441
  • URL: /core/journals/experimental-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed