Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:29:50.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latest Middle Cambrian metazoan reef from northern Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

B. Hamdi ,
A. Yu. Rozanov  and
A. Yu. Zhuravle
B. Hamdi
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Iran, P.O. Box 13185–1494, Tehran, Iran
A. Yu. Rozanov
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow 117647, Russia
A. Yu. Zhuravle
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow 117647, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Middle and Late Cambrian reefs were built mainly by cyanobacterial communities. A few reefs with a metazoan as well as an algal component, however, are known from this interval. A Middle Cambrian reef formed primarily by spicular demosponges is described here from the Mila Formation in the Elburz Mountains, northern Iran. The reef is enclosed within calcareous grainstones which contain terminal Middle Cambrian (late Mayan) trilobites. The Mila Formation reef was constructed by sponges of the family Anthaspidellidae and bacterial (algal?) sheaths, and is the earliest metazoan reef to be documented from the interval after the demise of archaeocyath sponges. The reefal community is typical of subsequent reefal communities of Early–Middle Ordovician age. The Ordovician examples differ only by the incorporation of additional metazoan elements.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 132 , Issue 4 , July 1995 , pp. 367 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahr, W. M., 1971. Paleoenvironment, algal structures and fossil algae in the Upper Cambrian of Central Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 41, 205–16.Google Scholar
Aitken, J. D., 1967. Classification and environmental significance of cryptalgal limestones and dolomites with illustrations from the Cambrian and Ordovician of southwestern Alberta. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 37, 1163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astashkin, V. A., Varlamov, A. I., Gubina, N. K., Ekhanin, A. E., Pereladov, V. S., Romenko, V. I., Sukhov, S. S., Umperovich, N. V., Fedorov, A. B., Fedyanin, A. P., Shishkin, B. B. & Khobnya, E. I., 1984. Geologiya i perspektivy neftegazonosnosti kembriyskikh rifovykh sistem Sibirskoy platformy [Geology and Prospects of Oil-gasbearing Cambrian Reef Systems of the Siberian Platform]. Nedra, Moscow, 181 pp. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Bengtson, S., Conway, Morris S., Cooper, B. J., Jell, P. A. & Runnegar, B. N., 1990. Early Cambrian Fossils from South Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists Memoir no. 9, 364 pp.Google Scholar
Beresi, M. S. & Rigby, J. K., 1993. The Lower Ordovician sponges of San Juan, Argentina. Brigham Young University Geological Studies 39, 1–63.Google Scholar
Church, S. B., 1974. Lower Ordovician patch reefs in western Utah. Brigham Young University Geological Studies 21, 41–62.Google Scholar
Copper, P., 1994. Ancient reef ecosystem expansion and collapse. Coral Reefs 13, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F., Rozanov, A. Yu. & Webers, G. F., 1984. Upper Cambrian Archaeocyatha from Antarctica. Geological Magazine 121, 291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Zhuravlev, A., 1994. Archaeocyathan affinity: How deep can we go into the systematic affiliation of an extinct group? In Sponges in Time and Space: Biology, Chemistry, Paleontology (eds van Soest, R. W. M., van Kempen, T. M. G. & Braekman, J. C.), pp. 3–12, Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Ding, Wei-Ming & Qian, Yi., 1988. Late Sinian to Early Cambrian small shelly fossils from Yangjiaping, Shimen, Hunan. Acta Micropaleontologica Sinica 5, 39–55 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Finks, R. M., 1967. The structure of Saccospongia laxata Bassler (Ordovician) and the phylogeny of the Demospongia. Journal of Paleontology 41, 1137–49.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Rushton, W. A., 1976. Chelidonocephalus trilobite fauna from the Cambrian of Iran. Bulletin British Museum Natural History (Geology) 27, 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatehouse, C. G., 1968. First record of lithistid sponges in the Cambrian of Australia. Bulletin Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics of Australia 92, 57–68.Google Scholar
Goryansky, V. Yu., 1977. Pervaya nakhodka ostatkov gubki v nizhnem kembrii Vostochoy Sibiri [First find of sponge remains in the Lower Cambrian of Eastern Siberia]. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo paleontologicheskogo obshchestva 20, 274–6 (In Russian).Google Scholar
Gruber, G. & Reitner, J., 1991. Isolierte Mikro- and Megaskleren von Poriferen aus dem Untercampan von Höver (Norddeutschland) und Bemerkungen zur Phylogenie der Geodiidae (Demospongiae). Berliner geowissenschaft Abhandlungen (A) 134, 107–17.Google Scholar
James, N. P. & Gravestock, D. I., 1990. Lower Cambrian shelf and shelf-margin buildups, Flinders Ranges, South Australia. Sedimentology 37, 455–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempen, T. M. G. va & Kate, W. G. H. Z. ten, 1980. The skeletons of two Ordovician anthaspidellid sponges; a semi-numerical approach. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen B 83, 437–53.Google Scholar
Kennard, J. M. & James, N. P., 1986. Thrombolites and stromatolites: Two distinct types of microbial structures. Palaios 1, 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. T. & Chafetz, H. S., 1983. Tidal-flat to shallow-shelf deposits in the Cap Mountain Limestone Member of the Riley Formation, Upper Cambrian of central Texas. Journal of Sedimentary Geology 53, 261–73.Google Scholar
Korde, K. B., 1957. Novye predstaviteli sifonnikovykh vodorosley (New representatives of the siphonaceous algae). In Materialy k “Osnovam paleontologii” [Papers for “Transactions on Palaeontology”] vol. 1 (ed. Korde, K. B.), pp. 67–75, pl. 3. Moscow: Palaeontological Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences (In Russian).Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D., 1983. Middle Cambrian ‘Archaeocyathus’ from the Georgina Basin is an anthaspidellid sponge. Alcheringa 7, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, P. D., 1990. Cambrian palaeontology of the Daly Basin. Northern Territory Geological Survey Report no. 7, 58+i–111 pp.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & James, N. P., 1995. Primordial metazoan-calcimicrobial reefs: Tommotian (Early Cambrian) of the Siberian Platform. Palaios 10, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushan, B., 1973. Stratigraphie und Trilobitenfauna in der Mila-Formation (Mittelkambrium-Tremadoc) im Alborz-Gebirge (N-Iran). Palaeontographica A144, 113–65.Google Scholar
Markello, J. R. & Read, J. F., 1981. Carbonate ramp-to-deeper shale transition of an Upper Cambrian intrashelf basin, Nolichucky Formation, Southwest Virginia Appalachians. Sedimentology 28, 573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlreath, I., 1977. Accumulation of a Middle Cambrian deep water limestone debris apron adjacent to a vertical submarine carbonate escarpment, southern Rocky Mountains, Canada. In Deep-Water Carbonate Environments (eds Cook, H. E., & Enas, P.), pp. 113–24. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication no. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moldowan, J. M., Dahl, J., Jacobson, S. R., Huizinga, B. J., McCaffrey, M. A. & Summons, R. E., 1994. Molecular fossil evidence for Late Proterozoic-Early Paleozoic environments. TERRA nova 6, Abstract supplement no. 3, 4.Google Scholar
Mostler, H. & Mosleh-Yazdi, A., 1976. Neue Poriferen aus oberkambrischen Gesteinen der Milaformation in Elburzgebirge (Iran). Geologisch-Paläontologische Mitteilungen Innsbruck 5, 1–36.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., 1973. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician conodonts from northern Iran. Geological Survey of Iran Report no. 30, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Okulitch, V. J. & Bell, W. G., 1955. Gallatinospongia, a new siliceous sponge from The Upper Cambrian of Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology 29, 460–1.Google Scholar
Pratt, B. R., 1989. Early Ordovician cryptalgal-sponge reefs, Survey Peak Formation, Rocky Mountains, Alberta. In Reefs, Canada and Adjacent Areas (eds Geldsetzer, H. H. J., James, N. P., & Tebbutt, E.), pp. 213–17. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir no. 13.Google Scholar
Pratt, B. R. & James, N. P., 1982. Cryptalgal-metazoan bioherms of early Ordovician age in the St George Group, western Newfoundland. Sedimentology 29, 543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitner, J., 1992. “Coralline Spongien”. Der Versuch einer phylogenetisch- taxonomischen Analyse. Berliner geowissenschaft Abhandlungen (E) 1, 1–352.Google Scholar
Riding, R., 1991. Classification of microbial carbonates. In Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites (ed. Riding, R.), pp. 21–51, New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, J. K., 1971. Sponges and reef and related facies through time. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention (Chicago), Part J, 1374–88.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu., 1992. The Lower Cambrian fossil record of the Soviet Union. In Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa (eds Lipps, J. H. & Signor, P. W.), pp. 205–82. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttner, A., Nabavi, M. & Hajian, J., 1968. Geology of the Shirgesht area (Tabas area, East Iran). Geological Survey of Iran Report no. 4, 133 pp.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H., Laurie, J. R. & Sun, Xiaowen, 1990. Classification and review of the trilobite order Agnostida Salter, 1864: an Australian perspective. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics of Australia Record no. 296, 93 pp.Google Scholar
Soest, R. W. M. van, 1991. Demosponge higher taxa classification re-examined. In Fossil & Recent Sponges (eds Reitner, J. & Keupp, H.), pp. 54–71. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, G. D. Jr, 1992. Tropical reef ecosystems and their evolution. In Encyclopedia of Earth System Sciences, vol. 4 (ed. Nierenberg, W. A.), pp. 375–388. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, M., Mehl, D., Reitner, J. & Erdtmann, B.-D., 1993. Oldest entirely preserved sponges and other fossils from the Lowermost Cambrian and a new facies reconstruction of the Yangtze platform (China). Berliner geowissenschaft (E) 9, 293–329.Google Scholar
Stöklin, J., Ruttner, A. & Nabavi, M., 1964. New data on the Lower Palaeozoic and pre-Cambrian of North Iran. Geological Survey of Iran Report no. 1, 29 pp.Google Scholar
Toomey, D. F., 1981. Organic-buildup constructional capability in Lower Ordovician and late Paleozoic mounds. In Communities of the Past (eds Gray, J., Boucot, A. J. & Berry, W. B. N.), pp. 35–68. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Toomey, D. F. & Nitecki, M. H., 1979. Organic buildups in the Lower Ordovician (Canadian) of Texas and Oklahoma. Fieldiana, New Series 2, 1–181.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D., 1984. Early Phanerozoic distribution patterns of some major groups of sessile organisms. Proceedings of the 27th International Geological Congress 2, 193–208. Utrecht: VNU Science Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. L., 1950. An Upper Cambrian pleospongiid (?). Journal of Paleontology 24, 591–3.Google Scholar
Wittke, H. W., 1984. Middle and Upper Cambrian trilobites from Iran: Their taxonomy, stratigraphy and significance for provincialism. Palaeontographica A183, 91–161.Google Scholar
Wolfart, R., 1983. The Cambrian System in the Near and Middle East, Correlation Chart and Explanatory Notes. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication no. 15, 71 pp., 1 chart.Google Scholar
Wood, R. A., Evans, K. R. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu., 1992. A new post-early Cambrian archaeocyath from Antarctica. Geological Magazine 129, 491–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Debrenne, F., 1992. Functional morphology and ecology of Archaeocyatha. Palaios 7, 131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Chimed, Tseren A., 1993. The ecology of Lower Cambrian buildups from Zuune Arts, Mongolia: implications for early metazoan reef evolution. Sedimentology 40, 829–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., 1995. Reef ecosystem recovery from the Early Cambrian extinctions. In Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinctions (eds. Erwin, D. H. & Hart, M.), in press Geological Society Special Publication.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Wood, R. A., 1994. Early Cambrian extinctions. TERRA nova 6, Abstract supplement no. 3, 9.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., 1960. Arkheotsiaty Sibirskoy platformy [Archaeocyaths of the Siberian Platform]. Moscow:USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, 344 pp. (In Russian).Google Scholar