Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T09:39:40.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2012

Sebnem Gumuscu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Turkish national elections of 12 June 2011 the ruling Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi (AKP, Justice and Development Party) registered an exceptional success in Turkish democracy. For the first time, an incumbent party had managed to increase its votes for three elections in a row and established its predominance. This article argues that the AKP, like the Christian Democrats in Italy, Liberal Democrats in Japan or Social Democrats in Sweden, has established a cycle of dominance that includes initial mobilization, expansion of core support through material benefits, delegitimization of the opposition and selective use of ideological rigidity and flexibility. It is through this cycle that the AKP consolidated its position as a right-wing party, unifying centre-right and Islamic constituencies and thereby accomplishing what the other right-wing parties in Turkey had failed to do in the past.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 223 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Sebnem Gumuscu is a post-doctoral fellow at Sabanci University. Contact email: sgumuscu@sabanciuniv.edu.

References

Akarca, A., Baslevent, C. (2010), Inter-party Vote Movements in Turkey: The Sources of AKP Votes in 2007, Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series 509.Google Scholar
AKP (2001), ‘Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi Parti Programi’, www.akparti.org.tr/site/akparti/parti-programi.Google Scholar
AKP (2011), ‘Alnimizin AK'iyla 8.5 yil’, www.akparti.org.tr/icraat.pdf.Google Scholar
Aydinli, E. (2011), ‘Ergenekon, New Pacts, and the Decline of the Turkish “Inner State” ’, Turkish Studies, 12(2): 227–239.Google Scholar
Bugra, A. (1998), ‘Class, Culture, and State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 30(4): 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulac, A. (2007), ‘Iyi bir Tercih’, Zaman, 25 April.Google Scholar
Carkoglu, A. (2002), ‘Turkey's November 2002 Elections: A New Beginning?’, Middle East Review of International Affairs, 6(4): 30–41.Google Scholar
Carkoglu, A. (2008), ‘Ideology or Economic Pragmatism?: Profiling Turkish Voters in 2007’, Turkish Studies, 9(2): 317–344.Google Scholar
Carkoglu, A. (2011), ‘Turkey's 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?’, Insight Turkey, 13(3): 43–62.Google Scholar
Carkoglu, A.Kalaycioglu, E. (2009a), The Rising Tide of Conservatism in Turkey (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Carkoglu, A.Kalaycioglu, E. (2009b), Turkish Democracy Today: Elections, Protest and Stability in an Islamic Society (London: I.B. Tauris).Google Scholar
Celik, A. (2010), ‘Muhafazakar Sosyal Politika Yonelimi: Hak Yerine Yardım, Yukumluluk Yerine Hayirseverlik’, I.U. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi, 42: 63–81.Google Scholar
Celik, H. (2011), interview, 16 June, www.akparti.org.tr/site/haberler/hueseyin-celikin-tvnette-yapt-acklamann-tam-metni/9354.Google Scholar
Cinar, M. (2007), ‘The Justice and Development Party and the Kemalist Establishment’, in U. Cizre (ed.), Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey (London: Routledge): 109–131.Google Scholar
Cinar, M. (2011), ‘The Electoral Success of the AKP: Cause for Hope and Despair’, Insight Turkey, 14(3): 107–127.Google Scholar
Cizre, U. (1996), ‘Liberalism, Democracy and the Turkish Center-Right: The Identity Crisis of the True Path Party’, Middle Eastern Studies, 32(2): 142–161.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2004), speech at the 4th Economy Congress, 5 May, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2007), speech, 12 December, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2009), various speeches in municipal election campaign, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2011a), speech, Sivas, 8 June, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2011b), speech, Bingol, 8 June, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2011c), speech, Ankara, 12 June, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Erdogan, T. (2011d), speech, Malatya, 17 May, www.akparti.org.tr.Google Scholar
Ergin, S. (2011), ‘Erdogan and CHP Leader's Alevi Origin’, Hurriyet Daily News, 18 May, www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=erdogan-and-the-chp-leader8217s-alevi-origin-2011-05-18.Google Scholar
Esen, B.Ciddi, S. (2011), ‘Turkey's 2011 Elections: An Emerging Dominant Party System?’, MERIA Journal, 15(3), www.gloria-center.org/2011/10/turkey%e2%80%99s-2011-elections-an-emerging-dominant-party-system.Google Scholar
Esmer, Y. (2002), ‘At the Ballot Box: Determinants of Voting Behavior’, in S. Sayari and Y. Esmer (eds), Politics, Parties and Governance (London: Lynne Rienner): 91–114.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), ‘Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: The Saga of Social Democracy’, in T.J. Pempel (ed.), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press): 33–57.Google Scholar
Fisher Onar, N. (2011), ‘Constructing Turkey Inc.: The Discursive Anatomy of a Domestic and Foreign Policy Agenda’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19(4, special issue on New Perspectives on Turkey–EU Relations): 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumuscu, S. (2010), ‘Class, Status, and Party: The Changing Face of Political Islam in Turkey and Egypt’, Comparative Political Studies, 43(7): 835–861.Google Scholar
Gunes-Ayata, A. (1994), ‘Roots and Trends of Clientelism in Turkey’, in L. Roniger and A. Gunes-Ayata (eds), Democracy, Clientelism and Civil Society (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guney, A.Karatekelioglu, P. (2005), ‘Turkey's EU Candidacy and Civil–Military Relations: Challenges and Prospects’, Armed Forces and Society, 31(3): 439–462.Google Scholar
Gur, A. (2010), interview in Taraf, 25 January.Google Scholar
Gurek, H. (2008), AKP'nin Muteahhitleri (Contractors of the AKP), (Istanbul: Guncel).Google Scholar
Heper, M. (2011), ‘Civil–Military Relations in Turkey: Toward a Liberal Model?’, Turkish Studies, 12(2): 241–252.Google Scholar
Hurriyet (2004), ‘Zina Tartismasi’ (The Debate on Adultery), Hurriyet, 13 September, http://arama.hurriyet.com.tr/arsivnews.aspx?id5256969.Google Scholar
Hurriyet Daily News (2012), ‘Debate on Religion Takes Over Politics in Ankara’, Hurriyet Daily News, 2 February, www.hurriyetdailynews.com/debate-on-religion-takes-over-politics-in-ankara.aspx?pageID=238&nID=12814&NewsCatID=338.Google Scholar
Milliyet (2011), ‘Yok: Katsayi Kaldirildi’, Milliyet, 1 December.Google Scholar
New York Times (2011), ‘Sponsor of Flotilla Tied to Elite of Turkey’, New York Times, 15 July 2011.Google Scholar
Onis, Z.Rubin, B. (2003), The Turkish Economy in Crisis: A Critical Perspective on the 2000–2001 Crises (London: Frank Cass).Google Scholar
Ozbudun, E. (2009), ‘Turkey: How Far From Consolidation?’, Journal of Democracy, 7(3): 123–138.Google Scholar
Pempel, T.J. (ed.) (1990), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Radikal (2008), ‘The Law to Protect Youth’, Radikal, 7 August, www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalDetayV3&ArticleID=892397&Date=08.08.2008&CategoryID=78.Google Scholar
Reed, H.A. (1954), ‘Revival of Islam in Secular Turkey’, Middle East Journal, 8(3): 267–282.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems (London: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sayari, S. (1978), ‘Turkish Party System in Transition’, Government and Opposition, 13(1): 39–57.Google Scholar
Sayari, S. (2007), ‘Towards a New Turkish Party System?’, Turkish Studies, 8(2): 197–210.Google Scholar
Sayari, S. (2008), ‘Non-Electoral Sources of Party System Change in Turkey’, in: S. Yazıcı, K. Gozler and F. Keyman (eds), Prof. Dr. Ergun Özbudun'a Armağan: Essays in Honor of Ergun Özbudun (Ankara: Yetkin): 399–418.Google Scholar
Secor, A. (2001), ‘Ideologies in Crisis: Political Cleavages and Electoral Politics in Turkey in the 1990s’, Political Geography, 20: 539–560.Google Scholar
TAPDK (Tobacco and Alcohol Market Regulatory Authority) (2011), ‘Announcements’, www.tapdk.gov.tr/soru_cevap.asp.Google Scholar
Umraniye Municipality (2011), author interview with social programme directors of Umraniye Municipality, 27 April.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S. (2008), ‘Calik'in kullandigi kredinin kosullari’, Milliyet, 24 July, http://ekonomi.milliyet.com.tr/sabah-ve-atv----/serpil-yilmaz/ekonomi/ekonomiyazardetay/24.07.2008/970454/default.htm.Google Scholar
Yavuz, H. (2009), Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar