Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea


Leaders have an important role in initiating and shaping the democratization process. Formal and informal structures within the political system constrain possible options requiring leaders to exercise agency to manage expectations and facilitate change. This article examines the actions of F.W. de Klerk (South Africa) and Roh Tae Woo (South Korea) in initiating processes that eventually led to the consolidation of democratic political systems. The aims of the article are: (1) to identify the array of opportunities and threats faced by the two leaders; and (2) to determine the effect of regime form in shaping these structural factors. Drawing on previous work on the role of leadership in democratization, the analysis focuses on four factors: authority, institutions, opposition and continuity. To assess decisions made in the distinct political contexts the article examines how the respective structural configuration (one-party and military) was managed.

Hide All

Thomas O’Brien is a Lecturer in Political Science at the Centre for International Security and Resilience, Cranfield University at the Defence Academy of the UK. Contact email:

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Bedeski (1994), The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstruction in the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo 1987–1992 (London: Routledge).

V. Bunce and S. Wolchik (2011), Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

T. Carothers (2002), ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 521.

J. Cotton (1989), ‘From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea’, Political Studies, 37(3): 244259.

A. Croissant (2004), ‘Riding the Tiger: Civilian Control and the Military in Democratizing Korea’, Armed Forces and Society, 30(3): 357381.

A. Croissant and J. Kamerling (2013), ‘Why do Military Regimes Institutionalize? Constitution-Making and Elections as Political Survival Strategy in Myanmar’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 21(2): 105125.

D. della Porta (2014), Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

R. Elgie (1995), Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press).

O. Encarnación (2000), ‘Beyond Transitions: The Politics of Democratic Consolidation’, Comparative Politics, 32(4): 479498.

P. Feaver (1999), ‘Civil–Military Relations’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 211241.

E. Frantz and E.A. Stein (2012), ‘Comparative Leadership in Non-Democracies’, in L. Helms (ed.), Comparative Political Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave): 292313.

S. Friedman (1998), ‘Too Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: South Africa’s Bargained Transition, Democratic Prospects and John Rawl’s “Veil of Ignorance”’, Politikon, 25: 5780.

J. Gandhi (2008), Political Institutions under Dictatorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

S. Haggard and R. Kaufman (1997), ‘The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions’, Comparative Politics, 29(3): 263283.

N. Kersting (2010), ‘Direct Democracy in Constitutional Processes: The South African Plebiscite of 1992’, Politikon, 37(2–3): 207222.

I. Kim (2013), ‘Intra-Military Divisions and Democratization in South Korea’, Armed Forces and Society, 39(4): 695710.

S. Levitsky and L. Way (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

S. Mainwaring and A. Pérez-Liñán (2013), Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival and Fall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

C. Moon and S. Rhyu (2011), ‘Democratic Transition, Persistent Civilian Control over the Military, and the South Korean Anomaly’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3): 250269.

T. O’Brien (2007), ‘The Role of the Transitional Leader: A Comparative Analysis of Adolfo Suárez and Boris Yeltsin’, Leadership, 3(4): 419432.

T. O’Brien (2010), ‘Problems of Political Transition in Ukraine: Leadership Failure and Democratic Consolidation’, Contemporary Politics, 16(4): 355367.

T. O’Brien (2015), ‘The Primacy of Political Security: Contentious Politics and Insecurity in the Tunisian Revolution’, Democratization, 22(7): 12091229.

G. O’Donnell (1996), ‘Illusions About Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 3451.

S. Ooi (2014), ‘The Transnational Protection Regime and Democratic Breakthrough in Taiwan and South Korea’, Democratization, 21(2): 311334.

J. Pfiffner (2010), ‘US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army’, Intelligence and National Security, 25(1): 7685.

D. Rustow (1970), ‘Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model’, Comparative Politics, 2(3): 337363.

C.J. Saxer (2003), ‘Democratic Transition and Institutional Crafting: The South Korean Case’, Democratization, 10(2): 4564.

R. Springborg (2011), ‘Whither the Arab Spring? 1989 or 1848?’, International Spectator, 46(3): 512.

U. Sundhaussen (1998), ‘The Military: A Threat to Democracy?’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 44(3): 329349.

J. Teorell (2010), Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

C. Tilly (2008), Contentious Performances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

F. Volpi (2013), ‘Explaining (and Re-explaining) Political Change in the Middle East during the Arab Spring: Trajectories of Democratization and of Authoritarianism in the Maghreb’, Democratization, 20(6): 969990.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 131 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.