Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland

  • Matthew Whiting
Abstract

This article examines how violent separatist groups moderate. Using the case of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland, it shows that moderation is a multidimensional process, entailing a change in strategic behaviour but not necessarily in the goals or values of a separatist group. For Irish republicans, moderation entailed giving up violent revolution and embracing peaceful reformism, but it did not require changing long-term goals, accepting the legitimacy of British rule in Northern Ireland, or distancing themselves from their history of armed struggle. Moderation was possible because both Irish republicans and the British state distinguished between republicans’ strategic behaviour and their political goals, with the British state neither expecting nor demanding a change in the goals of republicanism, and republicans showing a willingness to change tactics to bring them closer to their long-term goal of a united Ireland. This finding has important implications for the moderation of other radical separatist groups.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Matthew Whiting is a Fellow in Government in the Department of Government at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Contact email: m.whiting@lse.ac.uk.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Adams, G. (1998), ‘Keynote Statement on the Omagh Bombing and the State of the Peace Process, 1 September 1998’ (Belfast: Sinn Féin).
Alexander, G. (2002), The Sources of Democratic Consolidation (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
Bean, K. (2007), The New Politics of Sinn Féin (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).
Coakley, J. (2007), ‘National Identity in Northern Ireland: Stability or Change?’, Nations and Nationalism, 13(4): 573597.
Cox, M., Guelke, A. and Stephen, F. (2006) (eds), A Farewell to Arms? Beyond the Good Friday Agreement, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
De Zeeuw, J. (2008) (ed.), From Soldiers to Politicians: Transforming Rebel Movements After Civil War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
English, R. (2004), Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA (London: Pan).
Erk, J. and Anderson, L. (2010), ‘The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions?’, Federal and Regional Studies, 19(2): 191202.
Garry, J. (2009), ‘Consociation and its Critics: Evidence from the Historic Northern Ireland Assembly Election 2007’, Electoral Studies, 28(3): 458466.
Garry, J.(2014), ‘Potentially Voting Across the Divide in Deeply Divided Places: Ethnic Catch-All Voting in Consociational Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 62(S1): 219.
Gerring, J. (2007), ‘Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?’, Comparative Political Studies, 40(3): 231253.
Hansard (1974), 'Hansard Parliamentary Procedures', HC Deb, vol. 871, col. 1476 (4 April 1974).
Hart, P. (2003), The IRA at War, 1916–1923 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Hartzell, C. and Hoddie, M. (2007), Crafting Peace: Power Sharing Institutions and the Negotiated Settlement of Civil Wars (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).
Hartzell, C., Hoddie, M. and Rothchild, D. (2001), ‘Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables’, International Organization, 55(1): 183208.
Horowitz, D. (2014), ‘Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems’, Journal of Democracy, 25(2): 520.
Hutchinson, J. (2005), Nations as Zones of Conflict (London: Sage).
IRA (1973), Freedom’s Struggle (Dublin: IRA).
IRA (2005), ‘Statement on the Ending of the Armed Campaign, 28 July 2005’ (Dublin: Irish Republican Publicity Bureau).
Kerr, M. (2011), The Destructors: The Story of Northern Ireland’s Lost Peace Process (Dublin: Irish Academic Press).
Lustick, I. (1993), Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
Manning, C. (2004), ‘Armed Opposition Groups into Political Parties: Comparing Bosnia, Kosovo, and Mozambique’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(1): 5476.
Mattest, M. and Savun, B. (2009), ‘Fostering Peace After Civil War: Commitment Problems and Agreement Design’, International Studies Quarterly, 53(3): 737759.
McCrudden, C., McGarry, J., O’Leary, B. and Schwartz, A. (2016), ‘Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability’, Government and Opposition, 51(1): 3058.
McDonald, H. (2012), ‘Seven People Face Terrorism Charges in Northern Ireland’, The Guardian’, 19 May.
McEvoy, J. (2014), ‘The Role of External Actors in Incentivising Post-Conflict Power-Sharing’, Government and Opposition, 49(1): 4769.
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (1995), Explaining Northern Ireland: Broken Images (Oxford: Blackwell).
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (2008), ‘Consociation and its Critics: Northern Ireland after the Belfast Agreement’, in S. Choudhry (ed.), Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 369408.
Mitchell, P., Evans, G. and O’Leary, B. (2009), ‘Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 57(2): 397421.
Moore, G., Loizides, N., Sandal, N.A. and Lordos, A. (2014), ‘Winning Peace Frames: Intra-Ethnic Outbidding in Northern Ireland and Cyprus’, West European Politics, 37(1): 159181.
Northern Ireland Office (1972), The Future of Northern Ireland: A Paper for Discussion (London: Stationery Office).
O’Boyle, G. (2011), ‘Bombings to Ballots: The Evolution of the Irish Republican Movement’s Conceptualisation of Democracy’, Irish Political Studies, 26(4): 593606.
O’Leary, B. (1997), ‘The Conservative Stewardship of Northern Ireland, 1979–1997: Sound Bottomed Contradictions or Slow Learning?’, Political Studies, 45(4): 663676.
O’Leary, B. (1998), ‘The Nature of the Agreement’, Fordham International Law Review, 22(4): 16281667.
O’Leary, B., Grofman, B. and Elklit, J. (2005), ‘Divisor Methods for Sequential Portfolio Allocation in Multi-Party Executive Bodies: Evidence from Northern Ireland and Denmark’, American Journal of Political Science, 49(1): 198211.
Reilly, B. (2001), Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Reynolds, A. (1999–2000), ‘A Constitutional Pied Piper: The Northern Irish Good Friday Agreement’, Political Science Quarterly, 114(4): 613637.
Sanchez-Cuenca, I. (2008), ‘Party Moderation and Politicians’ Ideological Rigidity’, Party Politics, 10(3): 325342.
Schwedler, J. (2006), Faith in Moderation: Islamist Parties in Jordan and Yemen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Schwedler, J. (2011), ‘Can Islamists Become Moderates? Rethinking the Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis’, World Politics, 63(2): 347376.
Sinn, Féin (1974), Peace with Justice: Proposals for Peace in a New Federal Ireland (Dublin: Sinn Féin).
Sinn, Féin (1988), The Sinn Féin/SDLP Talks (Dublin: Sinn Féin).
Sinn, Féin (1996), Policing in Transition: A Legacy of Repression: An Opportunity for Justice (Dublin: Sinn Féin).
Snyder, J. (2000), From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict (New York: Norton).
Tezcür, G. (2010), The Paradox of Moderation: Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey (Austin: University of Texas Press).
Unal, M. (2014), ‘Strategist or Pragmatist: A Challenging Look at Ocalan’s Retrospective Classification and Definition of PKK’s Strategic Periods between 1973 and 2012’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(3): 419448.
Walter, B. (2002), Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Walter, B. (2006), ‘Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others’, American Journal of Political Science, 50(2): 313330.
Whitfield, T. (2014), Endgame for ETA: Elusive Peace in the Basque Country (London: Hurst).
Wickham, C. (2004), ‘The Path to Moderation: Strategy and Learning in the Formation of Egypt’s Wasat Party’, Comparative Politics, 36(2): 205228.
Wilson, S. (2006), ‘Hamas Sweep Palestinian Elections, Complicating Peace Efforts in Mideast’, Washington Post, 27 January.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed