Skip to main content Accessibility help

Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success

  • Steffen Blings (a1)


Niche parties often originate in social movements, yet the latter’s role in shaping these parties has received scant attention. I argue that movement roots can help niche parties achieve both vote- and policy-seeking goals by keeping core issues salient, bolstering issue ownership and securing allies in civil society. Employing interviews with movement, as well as Green and Pirate party leaders in Sweden and Germany, I identify three mechanisms (electoral pressure, grassroots linkage, elite orientation) that lead to programmatic alignment. This article extends an emerging research agenda that highlights how social movements shape party politics and offers evidence that niche party–movement interactions open new avenues for political representation counterbalancing mainstream parties’ increasing detachment from civil society.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success
      Available formats


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Adams, J, Clark, M, Ezrow, L and Glasgow, G (2006) Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50, 513529.
Adams, J, Ezrow, L and Leiter, D (2012) Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe. West European Politics 35, 12721294.
Bale, T and Bergman, T (2006) A Taste of Honey is Worse than None at All? Coping with the Generic Challenges of Support Party Status in Sweden and New Zealand. Party Politics 12, 189209.
Bischof, D (2017) Towards a Renewal of the Niche Party Concept: Parties, Market Shares and Condensed Offers. Party Politics 23, 220235.
Bischof, D and Wagner, M (2017) What Makes Parties Adapt to Voter Preferences? The Role of Party Organisation, Goals and Ideology. British Journal of Political Science, published early online, December.
Blühdorn, I (2009) Reinventing Green Politics: On the Strategic Repositioning of the German Green Party. German Politics 18, 3654.
Bolleyer, N, Little, C and von Nostitz, F-C (2015) Implementing Democratic Equality in Political Parties: Organisational Consequences in the Swedish and the German Pirate Parties. Scandinavian Political Studies 38, 158178.
Boström, M (2008) The Historical and Contemporary Roles of Nature Protection Organizations in Sweden. In Van Koppen K and Markham WT (eds), Protecting Nature. Organizations and Networks in Europe and the USA. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 213238.
Burchell, J (2002) The Evolution of Green Politics: Development and Change within European Green Parties. London: Earthscan.
Dalton, RJ (2008) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 5th edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Demker, M (2014) Sailing Along New Cleavages: Understanding the Electoral Success of the Swedish Pirate Party in the European Parliament Election 2009. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 49, 188206.
Dobusch, L and Gollatz, K (2012) Piraten Zwischen Transnationaler Bewegung und Lokalem Phänomen. In Bieber C and Leggewie C (eds), Unter Piraten. Erkundungen in Einer Neuen Politischen Arena. Bielefeld: transcript, pp. 2540.
Ezrow, L, De Vries, C, Steenbergen, M and Edwards, E (2011) Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters? Party Politics 17, 275301.
Farrer, B (2014) A Theory of Organizational Choice: Interest Groups and Parties as Substitutable Influence Mechanisms. Party Politics 20, 642645.
Frankland, EG, Lucardie, P and Rihoux, B (eds) (2008) Green Parties in Transition: The End of Grass-Roots Democracy? Farnham: Ashgate.
Gamson, W (1990) The Strategy of Social Protest, 2nd edn.Belmont: Wadsworth.
Häusermann, S and Kriesi, H (2015) What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice. In Beramendi P, Häusermann S, Kitschelt H and Kriesi H (eds), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202230.
Hernández, E and Kriesi, H (2016) The Electoral Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 55, 203224.
Johnston, H (2011) States and Social Movements. Malden, MA: Polity.
Junker, S (ed.) (2014) Rapport: Miljölöften För Europa Miljögranskning Av Svenska Toppkandidater Inför EU-Valet 2014. Stockholm: Naturskyddsföreningen.
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1995) Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics 1, 528.
Kirchheimer, O (1966) The Transformation of Western European Party Systems. In LaPalombara J and Weiner M (eds), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 177200.
Kitschelt, H (1988) Left-Libertarian Parties: Explaining Innovation in Competitive Party Systems. World Politics 40, 194234.
Kitschelt, H (1989) The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kitschelt, H (2000) Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33, 845879.
Kitschelt, H (2006) Movement Parties. In Katz RS and Crotty W (eds), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 278290.
Kriesi, H, Koopmans, R, Duyvendak, JW and Giugni, MG (1995) New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lawson, K (ed.) (1980) Political Parties and Linkage: A Comparative Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lawson, K (2004) Five Variations on a Theme: Interest Aggregation by Party Today. In Lawson K and Poguntke T (eds), How Political Parties Respond: Interest Aggregation Revisited. London: Routledge, pp. 250266.
Lindgren, S (2013) Pirate Panics: Comparing News and Blog Discourse on Illegal File Sharing in Sweden. Information, Communication & Society 16, 12421265.
Lipset, SM and Rokkan, S (eds) (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Little, C (2016) Green Parties in Government. In van Haute E (ed.), Green Parties in Europe. New York: Routledge, pp. 265279.
Marx, P and Schumacher, G (2013) Will to Power? Intra-Party Conflict in Social Democratic Parties and the Choice for Neoliberal Policies in Germany, the Netherlands and Spain (1980–2010). European Political Science Review 5, 151173.
McAdam, D and Tarrow, S (2010) Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements. Perspectives on Politics 8, 529542.
McAdam, D, Tarrow, S and Tilly, C (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meguid, BM (2005) Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99, 347359.
Meguid, BM (2008) Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, TM and Miller, B (2015) The Niche Party Concept and Its Measurement. Party Politics 21, 259271.
Meyer, TM and Wagner, M (2013) Mainstream or Niche? Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Programmatic Strategies of Political Parties. Comparative Political Studies 46, 12461272.
Müller, WC and Strøm, K (eds) (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naturskyddsföreningen (2014) Snabbguide – Så Vill Partierna Jobba För Miljön.
Panebianco, A (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pardos-Prado, S (2015) How Can Mainstream Parties Prevent Niche Party Success? Center-Right Parties and the Immigration Issue. Journal of Politics 77, 352366.
Petrocik, JR (1996) Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40, 825850.
Polk, J, Bakker, R, Edwards, E, Hooghe, L, Jolly, S, Koedam, J, Kostelka, F, Marks, G, Schumacher, G, Steenbergen, M, Vachudova, M and Zilovic, M (2017) Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Research and Politics 4, 19.
Przeworski, A and Sprague, J (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rasmussen, A and Lindeboom, G-J (2013) Interest Group–Party Linkage in the Twenty-First Century: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52, 264289.
Rucht, D and Roose, J (2004) Germany. In Rootes C. (ed.), Environmental Protest in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 80106.
Scarrow, SE (2015) Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tarrow, S (1998) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, M (2012) Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics 18, 845864.
Walgrave, S, Lefevere, J and Tresch, A (2012) The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 771782.
Zons, G (2016) How Programmatic Profiles of Niche Parties Affect Their Electoral Performance. West European Politics 39, 12051229.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Blings supplementary material

 Word (31 KB)
31 KB

Niche Parties and Social Movements: Mechanisms of Programmatic Alignment and Party Success

  • Steffen Blings (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.