Skip to main content

Public Agendas and Policy Agendas in Three Western European Countries: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

  • Andrea Pritoni (a1)

In any democratic system, the question of whether governments pay attention to citizens’ needs and requests represents a crucial component of democratic quality. But what conditions favour this fundamental democratic process? This article compares policy priorities identified by public opinion with the actual legislative production in Italy, Spain and the UK from 2003 to 2012. The article’s methodology is a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in which causal conditions are represented by politico-institutional and contextual factors, while the outcome consists of the degree of overlap between public opinion priorities and legislation. Empirical analysis shows that there are four paths leading to a correspondence in priorities: first, it is linked to the combination of high government decision-making capacity and declining citizens’ trust in government; second, it is also linked to the combination of rising citizens’ trust and low government decision-making capacity. Third and fourth, priorities also correspond where there is a simultaneous absence of both trust and elections, and in the absence of both decision-making capacity and elections, respectively.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email:
Hide All
Adams, J, Clark, M, Ezrow, L Glasgow, G (2004) Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results? British Journal of Political Science 34(4), 589610.
Arcenaux, K, Johnson, M, Lindstädt, R Vander Wielen, RJ (2016) The Influence of News Media on Political Elites: Investigating Strategic Responsiveness in Congress. American Journal of Political Science 60(1), 529.
Bartholomew, DJ Knott, M (1999) Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. London: Arnold.
Baumgartner, FR Jones, BD (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, FR, Green-Pedersen, C Jones, BD (2006) Comparative Studies of Policy Agendas. Journal of European Public Policy 13(7), 959974.
Bevan, S Jennings, W (2014) Representation, Agendas and Institutions. European Journal of Political Research 53, 3756.
Binzer-Hobolt, S Klemmemsen, R (2005) Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies 53(3), 379402.
Blais, A Bodet, MA (2006) Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers? Comparative Political Studies 39(10), 12431262.
Blumenthal, S (1982) The Permanent Campaign. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Borghetto, E, Carammia, M Zucchini, F (2014) The Impact of Party Policy Priorities on Italian Lawmaking from the First to the Second Republic, 1983–2006. In Green-Pedersen C and Walgrave S (eds), Agenda Setting, Policies, and Political Systems: A Comparative Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 164182.
Breeman, G, Lowery, D, Poppelaars, C, Resodihardjo, SL, Timmermans, A de Vries, J (2009) Political Attention in a Coalition System: Analysing Queen’s Speeches in the Netherlands 1945–2007. Acta Politica 44(1), 127.
Chaqués Bonafont, L Palau, AM (2011) Assessing the Responsiveness of Spanish Policymakers to the Priorities of their Citizens. West European Politics 34(4), 706730.
Chaqués Bonafont, L, Palau, AM Baumgartner, FR (2015) Agenda Dynamics in Spain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Converse, PE Pierce, R (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dalton, RJ, Farrell, DM McAllister, I (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esaiasson, P Wlezien, C (2017) Advances in the Study of Democratic Responsiveness: An Introduction. Comparative Political Studies 50(6), 699710.
Ezrow, L Hellwig, T (2014) Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets? Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization. International Studies Quarterly 58(4), 816827.
Gallagher, M (1991) Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies 10(1), 3351.
Golder, SN (2010) Bargaining Delays in the Government Formation Process. Comparative Political Studies 43(1), 332.
Hooghe, L, Marks, G Schakel, AH (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Countries. London: Routledge.
Huber, JD Powell, GB (1994) Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy. World Politics 46(3), 291326.
Jennings, W John, P (2009) The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science 53(4), 838854.
Jennings, W Wlezien, C (2011) Distinguishing between Most Important Problems and Issues. Public Opinion Quarterly 7(3), 545555.
John, P (2006) The Policy Agendas Project: a Review. Journal of European Public Policy 13(7), 975986.
John, P, Bertelli, A, Jennings, W Beavan, S (2013) Policy Agendas in British Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, BD (1994) Reconceiving Decision Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, BD Baumgartner, FR (2005) The Politics of Attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Klingemann, HD, Volkens, A, Bara, J, Budge, I McDonald, M (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klüver, H Spoon, JJ (2016) Who Responds? Voters, Parties, and Issue Attention. British Journal of Political Science 46(3), 633654.
Klüver, H Spoon, JJ (2017) Challenges to Multiparty Governments: How Governing in Coalitions Affects Coalition Parties’ Responsiveness to Voters. Party Politics 23(6), 793803.
Lindeboom, GJ (2012) Public Priorities in Government’s Hands: Corresponding Policy Agendas in the Netherlands? Acta Politica 47(4), 443467.
Lijphart, A. (2012) Patterns of Democracy, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lombardi, D Moschella, M (2016) Domestic Preferences and European Banking Supervision: Germany, Italy and the Single Supervisory Mechanism. West European Politics 39(3), 462482.
Manin, B, Przeworski, A Stokes, SC (1999) Elections and Representation. In Przeworski A, Stokes SC and Manin B (eds), Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2954.
Mansergh, L Thomson, R (2007) Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking. Comparative Politics 39(3), 311330.
Maravall, JM (1999) Accountability and Manipulation. In Przeworski A, Stokes SC and Manin B (eds), Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154196.
Miller, AH (1974) Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review 68(3), 951972.
Miller, WE Stokes, DE (1963) Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 57(1), 4556.
Monroe, AD (1995) Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980–1993. Public Opinion Quarterly 62(1), 628.
Mortensen, PB, Green-Pedersen, C, Breeman, G, Chaqués Bonafont, L, Jennings, W, John, P, Palau, AM Timmermans, A (2011) Comparing Government Agendas: Executive Speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies 44(8), 9731000.
Page, BI Shapiro, RY (1992) The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Powell, GB (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Views. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Pritoni, A (2017) Decision-Making Potential and ‘Detailed’ Legislation of Western European Parliamentary Governments (1990–2013). Comparative European Politics 15(2), 157179.
Ragin, CC (1987) The Comparative Method. Berkeley: University of Berkeley Press.
Ragin, CC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, CC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rihoux, B Ragin, CC (eds) (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles: Sage.
Rihoux, B, Alamos-Concha, P, Bol, D, Marx, A Rezsöhazy, I (2013) From Niche to Mainstream Method? A Comprehensive Mapping of QCA Application in Journal Articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly 66(1), 175184.
Scharpf, FW (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schneider, CQ Rohlfing, I (2013) Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research. Sociological Methods and Research 42(4), 559597.
Schneider, CQ Wagemann, C (2010) Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Comparative Sociology 9(3), 397418.
Schneider, CQ Wagemann, C (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soroka, SN Wlezien, C (2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spoon, JJ Klüver, H (2014) Do Parties Respond? How Electoral Context Influences Party Responsiveness. Electoral Studies 45(1), 3860.
Tsebelis, G (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press–Russell Sage Foundation.
Wagemann, C Schneider, CQ (2010) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: Agenda for a Research Approach and a Data Analysis Technique. Comparative Sociology 9(3), 376396.
Wlezien, C (1995) The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science 39, 9811000.
Wlezien, C (2004) Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy. Journal of Politics 66(1), 124.
Wlezien, C (2016) Public Opinion and Policy Representation: On Conceptualization, Measurement, and Interpretation. Policy Studies Journal 45(4), 561582.
Wlezien, C Soroka, S (2012) Political Institutions and the Opinion–Policy Link. West European Politics 35, 14071432.
Wlezien, C Soroka, S (2016) Public Opinion and Public Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics,
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Pritoni supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (43 KB)
43 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed