Skip to main content
×
Home

Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea

Abstract

Leaders have an important role in initiating and shaping the democratization process. Formal and informal structures within the political system constrain possible options requiring leaders to exercise agency to manage expectations and facilitate change. This article examines the actions of F.W. de Klerk (South Africa) and Roh Tae Woo (South Korea) in initiating processes that eventually led to the consolidation of democratic political systems. The aims of the article are: (1) to identify the array of opportunities and threats faced by the two leaders; and (2) to determine the effect of regime form in shaping these structural factors. Drawing on previous work on the role of leadership in democratization, the analysis focuses on four factors: authority, institutions, opposition and continuity. To assess decisions made in the distinct political contexts the article examines how the respective structural configuration (one-party and military) was managed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Thomas O’Brien is a Lecturer in Political Science at the Centre for International Security and Resilience, Cranfield University at the Defence Academy of the UK. Contact email: t.obrien@cranfield.ac.uk.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Attwell K. (2015), ‘Ethnocracy Without Groups: Conceptualising Ethnocratic States Without Reifying Ethnic Categories’, Ethnopolitics, published early online, April, doi: 10.1080/17449057.2015.1035559.
Bedeski R. (1994), The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstruction in the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo 1987–1992 (London: Routledge).
Blondel J. (1987), Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis (London: Sage).
Brooker P. (2000), Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Bunce V. and Wolchik S. (2011), Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Burns J.M. (1978), Leadership (New York: Harper & Row).
Carothers T. (2002), ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 521.
Cotton J. (1989), ‘From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea’, Political Studies, 37(3): 244259.
Croissant A. (2004), ‘Riding the Tiger: Civilian Control and the Military in Democratizing Korea’, Armed Forces and Society, 30(3): 357381.
Croissant A. and Kamerling J. (2013), ‘Why do Military Regimes Institutionalize? Constitution-Making and Elections as Political Survival Strategy in Myanmar’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 21(2): 105125.
Cronin T.E. (1993), ‘Reflections on Leadership’, in W.E. Rosenbach and R.L. Taylor (eds), Contemporary Issues in Leadership (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
della Porta D. (2014), Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Deng F. (2011), Unintended Consequences of Social Movements: The 1989 Chinese Student Movement (London: Routledge).
Elgie R. (1995), Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press).
Encarnación O. (2000), ‘Beyond Transitions: The Politics of Democratic Consolidation’, Comparative Politics, 32(4): 479498.
Feaver P. (1999), ‘Civil–Military Relations’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 211241.
Frantz E. and Stein E.A. (2012), ‘Comparative Leadership in Non-Democracies’, in L. Helms (ed.), Comparative Political Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave): 292313.
Friedman S. (1998), ‘Too Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: South Africa’s Bargained Transition, Democratic Prospects and John Rawl’s “Veil of Ignorance”’, Politikon, 25: 5780.
Gandhi J. (2008), Political Institutions under Dictatorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Geldenhuys D. and Kotzé H. (1985), ‘P.W. Botha as Decision Maker: A Preliminary Study of Personality and Politics’, Politikon, 12(1): 3042.
Giddens A. (1995), Politics, Sociology and Social Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Giliomee H. (2013), The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power (Cape Town: Tafelberg).
Giliomee H. and Simkins C. (1999), ‘The Dominant Party Regimes of South Africa, Mexico, Taiwan and Malaysia: A Comparative Assessment’, in H. Giliomee and C. Simkins (eds), The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers): 146.
Glad B. and Blanton R. (1997), ‘F.W. de Klerk and Nelson Mandela: A Study in Cooperative Transformational Leadership’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27(3): 565590.
Guo S. and Stradiotto G. (2014), Democratic Transitions: Modes and Outcomes (Abingdon: Routledge).
Haggard S. and Kaufman R. (1997), ‘The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions’, Comparative Politics, 29(3): 263283.
Hite K. and Morlino L. (2004), ‘Problematizing the Links between Authoritarian Legacies and “Good” Democracy’, in K. Hite and P. Cesarini (eds), Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press): 2584.
Huntington S. (1970), ‘Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems’, in S. Huntington and C. Moore (eds), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems (New York: Basic Books): 374.
Kersting N. (2010), ‘Direct Democracy in Constitutional Processes: The South African Plebiscite of 1992’, Politikon, 37(2–3): 207222.
Kim I. (2013), ‘Intra-Military Divisions and Democratization in South Korea’, Armed Forces and Society, 39(4): 695710.
Levitsky S. and Way L. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Linz J. and Stepan A. (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Mainwaring S. and Pérez-Liñán A. (2013), Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival and Fall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
McFaul M. (2002), ‘The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World’, World Politics, 54(2): 212244.
Moon C. and Rhyu S. (2011), ‘Democratic Transition, Persistent Civilian Control over the Military, and the South Korean Anomaly’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3): 250269.
Nordlinger E. (1977), Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
O’Brien T. (2007), ‘The Role of the Transitional Leader: A Comparative Analysis of Adolfo Suárez and Boris Yeltsin’, Leadership, 3(4): 419432.
O’Brien T. (2010), ‘Problems of Political Transition in Ukraine: Leadership Failure and Democratic Consolidation’, Contemporary Politics, 16(4): 355367.
O’Brien T. (2015), ‘The Primacy of Political Security: Contentious Politics and Insecurity in the Tunisian Revolution’, Democratization, 22(7): 12091229.
O’Donnell G. (1996), ‘Illusions About Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 3451.
O’Donnell G. and Schmitter P. (1986), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Ooi S. (2014), ‘The Transnational Protection Regime and Democratic Breakthrough in Taiwan and South Korea’, Democratization, 21(2): 311334.
Pfiffner J. (2010), ‘US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army’, Intelligence and National Security, 25(1): 7685.
Rustow D. (1970), ‘Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model’, Comparative Politics, 2(3): 337363.
Saxer C.J. (2003), ‘Democratic Transition and Institutional Crafting: The South Korean Case’, Democratization, 10(2): 4564.
Sisk T.D. (1995), Democratization in South Africa: The Elusive Social Contract (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Springborg R. (2011), ‘Whither the Arab Spring? 1989 or 1848?’, International Spectator, 46(3): 512.
Sundhaussen U. (1998), ‘The Military: A Threat to Democracy?’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 44(3): 329349.
Tarrow S. (1995), ‘Mass Mobilization and Regime Change: Pacts, Reform, and Popular Power in Italy (1918–1922) and Spain (1975–1978)’, in R. Gunther, P. Diamandouros and H. Puhle (eds), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 204230.
Teorell J. (2010), Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Tilly C. (2008), Contentious Performances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Tripp C. (2013), The Power and the People: Paths of Resistance in the Middle East (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Volpi F. (2013), ‘Explaining (and Re-explaining) Political Change in the Middle East during the Arab Spring: Trajectories of Democratization and of Authoritarianism in the Maghreb’, Democratization, 20(6): 969990.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 132 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 339 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.