Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea

Abstract

Leaders have an important role in initiating and shaping the democratization process. Formal and informal structures within the political system constrain possible options requiring leaders to exercise agency to manage expectations and facilitate change. This article examines the actions of F.W. de Klerk (South Africa) and Roh Tae Woo (South Korea) in initiating processes that eventually led to the consolidation of democratic political systems. The aims of the article are: (1) to identify the array of opportunities and threats faced by the two leaders; and (2) to determine the effect of regime form in shaping these structural factors. Drawing on previous work on the role of leadership in democratization, the analysis focuses on four factors: authority, institutions, opposition and continuity. To assess decisions made in the distinct political contexts the article examines how the respective structural configuration (one-party and military) was managed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Unbuilding from the Inside: Leadership and Democratization in South Africa and South Korea
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Thomas O’Brien is a Lecturer in Political Science at the Centre for International Security and Resilience, Cranfield University at the Defence Academy of the UK. Contact email: t.obrien@cranfield.ac.uk.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Bedeski (1994), The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstruction in the Sixth Republic under Roh Tae Woo 1987–1992 (London: Routledge).

V. Bunce and S. Wolchik (2011), Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

T. Carothers (2002), ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 521.

J. Cotton (1989), ‘From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea’, Political Studies, 37(3): 244259.

A. Croissant (2004), ‘Riding the Tiger: Civilian Control and the Military in Democratizing Korea’, Armed Forces and Society, 30(3): 357381.

A. Croissant and J. Kamerling (2013), ‘Why do Military Regimes Institutionalize? Constitution-Making and Elections as Political Survival Strategy in Myanmar’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 21(2): 105125.

D. della Porta (2014), Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

R. Elgie (1995), Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press).

O. Encarnación (2000), ‘Beyond Transitions: The Politics of Democratic Consolidation’, Comparative Politics, 32(4): 479498.

P. Feaver (1999), ‘Civil–Military Relations’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 211241.

E. Frantz and E.A. Stein (2012), ‘Comparative Leadership in Non-Democracies’, in L. Helms (ed.), Comparative Political Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave): 292313.

S. Friedman (1998), ‘Too Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: South Africa’s Bargained Transition, Democratic Prospects and John Rawl’s “Veil of Ignorance”’, Politikon, 25: 5780.

J. Gandhi (2008), Political Institutions under Dictatorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

S. Haggard and R. Kaufman (1997), ‘The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions’, Comparative Politics, 29(3): 263283.

N. Kersting (2010), ‘Direct Democracy in Constitutional Processes: The South African Plebiscite of 1992’, Politikon, 37(2–3): 207222.

I. Kim (2013), ‘Intra-Military Divisions and Democratization in South Korea’, Armed Forces and Society, 39(4): 695710.

S. Levitsky and L. Way (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

S. Mainwaring and A. Pérez-Liñán (2013), Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival and Fall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

C. Moon and S. Rhyu (2011), ‘Democratic Transition, Persistent Civilian Control over the Military, and the South Korean Anomaly’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3): 250269.

T. O’Brien (2007), ‘The Role of the Transitional Leader: A Comparative Analysis of Adolfo Suárez and Boris Yeltsin’, Leadership, 3(4): 419432.

T. O’Brien (2010), ‘Problems of Political Transition in Ukraine: Leadership Failure and Democratic Consolidation’, Contemporary Politics, 16(4): 355367.

T. O’Brien (2015), ‘The Primacy of Political Security: Contentious Politics and Insecurity in the Tunisian Revolution’, Democratization, 22(7): 12091229.

G. O’Donnell (1996), ‘Illusions About Consolidation’, Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 3451.

S. Ooi (2014), ‘The Transnational Protection Regime and Democratic Breakthrough in Taiwan and South Korea’, Democratization, 21(2): 311334.

J. Pfiffner (2010), ‘US Blunders in Iraq: De-Baathification and Disbanding the Army’, Intelligence and National Security, 25(1): 7685.

D. Rustow (1970), ‘Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model’, Comparative Politics, 2(3): 337363.

C.J. Saxer (2003), ‘Democratic Transition and Institutional Crafting: The South Korean Case’, Democratization, 10(2): 4564.

R. Springborg (2011), ‘Whither the Arab Spring? 1989 or 1848?’, International Spectator, 46(3): 512.

U. Sundhaussen (1998), ‘The Military: A Threat to Democracy?’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 44(3): 329349.

J. Teorell (2010), Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

C. Tilly (2008), Contentious Performances (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

F. Volpi (2013), ‘Explaining (and Re-explaining) Political Change in the Middle East during the Arab Spring: Trajectories of Democratization and of Authoritarianism in the Maghreb’, Democratization, 20(6): 969990.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 161 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.