Jesus as Son of Man

¹ Parallels are not cited where there is no evidence of independent tradition. In the reference Mk. 8 30 the earliest of the three embodiments of the tradition is appealed to. The fact that it is transcribed with slight modifications in Mt. 16 20 and Lk. 9 21 adds nothing to the force of Mark's evidence.

² The transfiguration story is expressly designed to carry back the Pauline transcendental conception of the messiahship into the earthly career of Jesus. But even in the Synoptic tradition it intervenes as a psychological anachronism, a rebuke of the twelve, which as yet they are incapable of understanding, for conceiving the messiahship of Jesus “after the things that be of men.” In the Apocalypse of Peter it is frankly placed after the resurrection.

³ Sprüche und Reden Jesu, p. 166.

⁴ In Harnack's Sprüche und Reden Jesu they are numbered 25 (Mt. 11 23–27, Lk. 10 21 f.) and 15 (Mt. 11 16–19, Lk. 7 31–35) respectively.

⁵ The passage whose comparison of the coming ofthe Baptist with that of “the Son of Man” was quoted above.

⁶ On Jesus' idea of the Coming of the Son of Man, see below.

⁷ Wernle, Synoptische Frage, p. 226: “Diese zwei Stücke [the Baptist's discourse and the Temptation of Jesus] sehen überhaupt aus wie eine geschichtliche Einleitung, die nachträglich dem Werk vorgesetzt wurde.”

⁸ Against Harnack, who exclaims, apropos of the same, “Welch' ein Zeichen der Echtheit!” (p. 165).

⁹ Jn. 6 30 ff. combines these two.

¹⁰ Note the similar antithesis in Lk. 12 13–34, where Solomon appears as the rich and wise king of Ecclesiastes in contrast with the poverty of Jesus and his followers.

¹¹ Assonance between the names John and Jonah may have played a part.

¹² It is not apparent from Harnack's language in note 2 on p. 165 whether he regards this occurrence as “unsicher,” as well as that in Lk. 12 8, where the parallel Mt. 10 32 has simply “I,” or whether he holds to Mt. 12 32, Lk. 12 10 as certainly authentic. The former is designated by him No. 34^a the latter No. 34^b. His statement on p. 165 is: “Doch ist er [der Ausdruck Menschensohn] in Nr. 34 unsicher.”