Skip to main content
×
Home

Information will be the key to successful implementation

  • Peter Littlejohns (a1) and Kalipso Chalkidou (a2)
Abstract

Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage [UHC; World Health Organization (WHO), 2014] is to be welcomed because tackling the relationship between cost-effectiveness and fairness has been given too little attention in policy-making. The consensus that universal coverage is a good thing quickly disperses as the concept is translated into working national policies and local delivery processes. As Weale (2014) and Rumbold and Wilson (2014) point out, seeking practical solutions can lead to the re-exploration of previous givens and result in unexpected ethical and philosophical consequences. While the basic premise underlying the discussion on the ethics of resource concurs with the view that equity is always at odds with efficiency, this is not inevitable as the authors of the report point out in their analysis – a view more fully explored by Culyer (2006). The present report is a welcome attempt to reconcile, as countries progress to UHC, ethical norms with the reality of setting priorities, involving what to pay for and under what circumstances.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence to: Professor Peter Littlejohns, Professor of Public Health, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, King’s College London, 5th Floor, Capital House, Guy's, SE1 3QD, London, UK. Email: peter.littlejohns@kcl.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Bobadilla J.-L., Cowley P., Musgrove P. and Saxenian H. (1994), ‘Design, content and financing of an essential national package of health services’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 72(4): 653662.
Culyer A. J. (2006), ‘The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity’, Health Economics, 15(11): 11551158.
Culyer A. J., McCabe C., Briggs A., Claxton K., Buxton M., Akehurst R., Sculpher M. and Brazier J. (2007), ‘Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the national institute for health and clinical excellence’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 12(1): 5658.
Garner S. and Littlejohns P. (2011), ‘Disinvestment from low value services: nicely done’, BMJ, 343: d4519.
Longworth L., et al. (2009), MRC-NICE Scoping Project: Identifying the National Institute For Health And Clinical Excellence’s Methodological Research Priorities and an Initial Set of Priorities, University of York: Centre for Health Economics, CHE Research Paper 51. https://www.york.ac.uk/che/pdf/rp51.pdf [28 August 2014].
McCabe C., Claxton K. and Culyer A. J. (2008), ‘The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold’, Pharmacoeconomics, 26(9): 733744.
Revill P., Asaria M., Phillips A., Gibb D. M. and Gilks C. F. (2014), WHO Decides What Is Fair? International HIV Treatment Guidelines, Social Value Judgements and Equitable Provision of Lifesaving Antiretroviral Therapy, University of York: Centre for Health Economics, CHE Research Paper 99. http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/CHERP99_International_HIV_Guidelines_ART.pdf [28 August 2014].
Rumbold B. and Wilson J. (2014), ‘Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable’, Health, Economics, Poilcy and Law, forthcoming.
Tantivess S., Werayingyong P., Chuengsaman P. and Teerawattananon Y. (2013), ‘Universal coverage of renal dialysis in Thailand: promise, progress and prospects’, British Medical Journal, 346: f462.
Vorhoeve A., Ottersen T. and Norheim O. (2014), ‘Response to our critics’, Health, Economics, Policy and Law, forthcoming.
Weale A. (2014), ‘The path from nowhere?’, Health, Economics, Policy and Law, forthcoming.
Weale A. and Littlejohns P. (2014), ‘Why Is NICE Saying “Yes” So Often?’, http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g4603/rapid-responses [19 December 2014].
World Health Organization (WHO) (2014), Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage, Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112671/1/9789241507158_eng.pdf?ua=1 [27 July 2014].
World Health Organization/The World Bank (2013), Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels: A Framework. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/UHC_WBG_DiscussionPaper_Dec2013.pdf [28 August 2014].
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Health Economics, Policy and Law
  • ISSN: 1744-1331
  • EISSN: 1744-134X
  • URL: /core/journals/health-economics-policy-and-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 31 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 397 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.