Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:58:55.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is it not time for health economists to rethink equity and access?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

GAVIN MOONEY
GAVIN MOONEY*
Affiliation:
Professor of Health Economics, Curtin University, Australia and Honorary Professor, Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa
*
*Correspondence to: Professor Gavin Mooney, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845, Australia. Email: g.mooney@curtin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers two key issues in health economics regarding the question of equity. First, why have health economists not resolved better the issue of what are equity and access? Second, the paper draws attention to the relative lack of analyses of equity concerns outside of health care. The question of whose values should prevail in equity is also addressed. On the first issue, there is an obsession with quantification in economics with the result that in analysing equity, in practice often ‘use’ has been substituted for ‘access’. The problem of defining access has thereby been by-passed. This has taken the pressure off trying to research access per se. Second, what is meant by equity and access are in part culturally determined. The continued efforts of health economists to treat equity as some universal construct are misplaced. The lack of effort on the part of health economists to look at equity more broadly than health care equity is concerning. Certainly, to be pursued in practice, equity in both health and health care need a shift in resources, which will be opposed by those who exercise power over decision making in health care and in society more generally. Currently health economists’ analyses say all too little about power and property rights in health care and in society. It is argued that the relevant citizens or communities which a health service serves are best placed to judge the access barriers they face and their relative heights. A useful definition of equity established by a citizens’ jury in Perth, Australia is used to exemplify this point. It is concluded that the often all too simplistic equity goals adopted in health economics (and sometimes public health discourse) need to be challenged. For health economists, there is a need for more of us to get involved in the issues around inequalities, class and power and the impact of these on health.

Type
Special Section on Access to Health Care
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 209 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, V. (1999), ‘Equity of the ineffable: cultural and political constraints in ethnomedicine as a health problem in contemporary Tibet’, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, WP Series no. 99.05, April 1999.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2003), ‘Sen, ethics and democracy’, Feminist Economics, 9: 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroua, A. (No Date), ‘Health an Islamic perspective: community health in Islamic perspectives’ (retrieved 28 April 2008 from www.islamset.com/hip/ahmed_aroua.html)Google Scholar
Bell, L.A. (1997), ‘Theoretical foundations for social justice education’, in Adams, A., Bell, L.A. and Griffin, P.(eds.), Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braveman, P. and Gruskin, S.(2003), ‘Defining equity in health’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57: 254–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chizhik, E. W. and Chizhik, A.W.(2002), ‘Decoding the language of social justice: what do privilege and oppression really mean?’, Journal of College Student Development, 43: 792–808.Google Scholar
Coburn, D. (2004), ‘Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities’, Social Science and Medicine, 58(1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deaton, A. (2003), ‘Health, inequality and economic development’, Journal of Economic Literature, 41(1): 113–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of South Australia (2007), ‘GP Plus Health Care Strategy’ (retrieved 28 April from http://www.health.sa.gov.au/Default.aspx?tabid=58).Google Scholar
Gravelle, H. (1998), ‘How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact?’, British Medical Journal, 316: 382–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homedes, N. and Ugalde, A.(2005), ‘Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America’, Health Policy, 71: 83–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawachi, I. and Kennedy, B.P.(2002), The Health of Nations: Why Inequality is Harmful to Your Health, New York: New Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D., Thiede, M. and Birch, S. (2009), ‘Access as a policy-relevant concept in low- and middle-income countries’, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 4: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, G. (1998), ‘Communitarian claims as an ethical basis for allocating health care resources’, Social Science and Medicine, 47(9): 1171–1180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, G. and Blackwell, S.(2004), ‘Whose health service is it anyway?’, Medical Journal of Australia, 180: 76–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, G. and Houston, S. (2004) ‘An alternative approach to resource allocation: weighted capacity to benefit plus MESH infrastructure’, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 3(1): 29–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, G. and Russell, E. (2003), Equity in health care: the need for a new economics paradigm?’, in Scott, A., Maynard, A. and Elliott, R(eds.), Advances in Health Economics, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mooney, G. and Wiseman, V. (2000), ‘A constitution for health services’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 4: 1–2.Google Scholar
Navarro, V. (2007a), ‘The politics of health inequalities research in the United States’, in Navarro, V.(ed.), Neoliberalism Globalization and Inequalities, New York: Baywood.Google ScholarPubMed
Navarro, V. (2007b), ‘Neoliberalism as a class ideology; or, the political causes of the growth of inequalities’, in Navarro, V.(ed.), Neoliberalism, Globalization and Inequalities, New York: Baywood.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell-Mayhew, S. (2007), ‘Eating disorders and obesity as social justice issues’, Journal of Social Action in Counselling and Psychology 1 (retrieved 28 April 2008 from http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:D0TL0_e9ZysJ:www.psysr.org/jsacp/russellmayhew.v1n1.pdf+Russell-Mayhew+social+justice&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=au)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1992), Inequality Re-examined, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, O. (2004), ‘On social justice and political struggle’, Human Nature Review, 4: 152–163.Google Scholar
Thiede, M., Akweongo, P.and McIntyre, D. (2007), ‘Exploring the dimensions of equity’, in McIntyre, D. and Mooney, G.(eds.), The Economics of Health Equity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Doorslaer, E., Masseria, C.and Koopman, X. (2006), ‘Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries’, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(2): 177–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veatch, R.M. (2000), Cross Cultural Perspectives in Medical Ethics: Readings, Boston: Jones & Bartelett.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, A., and van Doorslaer, E. (2000), ‘Equity in health care finance and delivery’, in Culyer, A.J. and Newhouse, J.P.(eds.), Handbook of Health Economics, Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
WHO (2000), World Health Report, Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R.G. and Pickett, K.E. (2006), ‘Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the literature’, Social Science and Medicine, 62(7): 1768–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar