Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Hegel's Hyperbolic Formalism 1

  • Rocío Zambrana (a1)
Extract

The Science of Logic is perhaps Hegel's most notoriously impenetrable work. Despite well over a century of commentaries as well as the recent proliferation of scholarship, there exists little agreement concerning the text, whether with regard to particular details or the project of speculative logic in general. Nonetheless, the Logic has often been regarded as exemplifying totalizing metaphysics at its worst. Contemporary philosophers concerned with overcoming metaphysics have thus sought to show not only the incoherence of speculative logic but also the perils of Hegel's supposedly totalizing philosophy.

In contrast, showing the continuity between Kant and Hegel has been the strategy for establishing a ‘non-metaphysical’ view of Hegel's speculative logic. Against readings of Hegel as a metaphysical monist who defends the reality of the Absolute Idea developing in nature and spirit, speculative logic is presented as the absolute-idealist successor to Kantian transcendental logic. Hegel's speculative logic is an ‘idealist logic’, since it aims at expounding the conditions necessary for the determinacy of any possible object of thought. Speculative logic thus clarities that experience is dependent on non-empirical concepts and, ultimately, on selfconsciousness. Along this interpretative line, Hegel's Science of Logic offers an account of thinking as a norm-based activity, and of concepts as rules for fixing determinacy. The great insight of Hegel's Logic is, on this view, twofold. First, Hegel's notion of the concept [der Begriff] is understood as a holistic-inferential system of logical concepts, since it provides an account of conceptual content as determined by every other possible content. Second, Hegel's analysis of the actualization of the concept — of the concept that has ‘made itself the foundation’, in Hegel's obscure phrasing — provides an account of the fundamental role of authority involved in the process of fixing determinacy. To be bound to a rule is to acknowledge it as having authority over us and at the same time to institute it as authoritative over the states of affairs that we seek to determine. That Hegel spoke of the freedom of the concept is, therefore, crucial. It suggests that determinacy is ultimately a matter of the authorization of reason, of establishing one way of fixing intelligibility over against others.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
1

This paper was presented at a symposium on the closing argument of Hegel's Science of Logic hosted by the Society for Systematic Philosophy and held at the 2009 Meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association. I would like to thank Richard Dien Winfield for his kind invitation to participate in the symposium. I am deeply grateful to Jay Bernstein, Richard Bernstein, Karen Ng, Angelica Nuzzo, and Martin Hagglund for helpful comments on and incisive questions about this essay.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Brandom, R. (1991), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays on the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, R. (2005), ‘Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel: Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts’, Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealism us 3.
Burbidge, J. (1988), On Hegel's Logic: Fragments of a Commentary. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
Burbidge, J. (2004), ‘Hegel's Logic’ in Woods, Gabbay and (eds.), The Rise of Modem Logic. From Leibniz to Frege, vol. 3 of The Handbook of the History of Logic. Maryland Heights: North Holland Press.
Burbidge, J. (2007), Hegel's Systematic Contingency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1982), Hegel's Dialectics: Five Hermeneutkal Studies, trans. Smith, P. Christopher. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Haas, A. (2000), Hegel and the Problem of Multiplicity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Hartmann, K. (1977), ‘Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View’ in MacIntyre, Alasdair (ed.), Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hägglund, M. (2010), ‘The Arche-Materiality of Time: Deconstruction, Evolution, and Speculative Materialism,’ in Attridge, Derek and Elliott, Jane, ed. Theory after ‘Theory’. London: Routledge.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969a), Wissenschaft der Logik, vols. 5 and 6 of Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969b), Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969c), Phänomenologie des Geistes, vol. 3 of Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1970), Philosophy of Nature: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Part II Hegel's Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Trans. Miller, A.V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henrich, D. (1967), Hegelim Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Houlgate, S. (2005), Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History, 2nd ed. London: Blackwell.
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel's Logic. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Inwood, M. (1992), A Hegel Dictionary. London: Blackwell.
Kant, I. (1965), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Lau, C.-F. (2006), ‘Language and Metaphysics: The Dialectics of Hegel's Speculative Proposition’ in Surber, Jere (ed.), Hegel and Language. Albany: SUNY Press.
Longuenesse, B. (2007), Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics, trans. Simek, Nicole J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marx, K. (1976), Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Mandel, Ernest, vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.
McCumber, J. (1993), The Company of Words: Hegel, Language and Systematic Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Michelet, K.L. (1876), Das System der Philosophic als exacter Wissenschaft. Berlin: Nicolaischer Verlag.
Nuzzo, A. (1999), ‘The Idea of “Method” in Hegel's Science of Logic—a Method or Finite Thinking and Absolute Reason’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 3940.
Nuzzo, A. (2005), ‘The End of Hegel's Logic. Absolute Idea as Absolute Method’ in Carlson, David Gray (ed.), Hegel's Theory of the Subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nuzzo, A. (2006), ‘The Language of Hegel's Speculative Philosophy’ in Surber, Jere (ed.), Hegel and Language. Albany: SUNY Press.
Nuzzo, A. (2007), ‘Dialectical Reason and Necessary Conflict: Understanding and the Nature of Terror’, Cosmos and History 3: 23.
Pinkard, T. (1979), “Hegel's Idealism and Hegel's Logic”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 33: 2.
Pinkard, T. (1988), Hegel's Dialectics: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Pinkard, T. (1996), Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinkard, T. (2002), German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. (1989), Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. (2005), ‘Brandom's Hegel’, European Journal of Philosophy 13: 3.
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proops, I. (2005), ‘Kant's Conception of Analytic Judgment’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20: 3.
Putnam, H. (2002), The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Redding, P. (1996), Hegel's Hermeneutics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return to Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rinaldi, G. (1992), A History of Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellon Press.
Rockmore, T. (2005), Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rose, G. (1981), Hegel Contra Sociology. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Sallis, J. (1997), ‘Hegel's Concept of Presentation: Its Determination in the Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit’, in Stewart, John (ed.), The Phenomenology of Spirit' Reader. Critical and Interpretive Essays. Albany: SUNY Press.
Stern, R. (1990), Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object. London: Routledge.
Surber, J. (1975), ‘Hegel's Speculative Sentence’, Hegel-Studien 10.
Tugenhadt, E. ( 1976), ‘Das Sein und Das Nichts,’ in Klostermann, Vittorio, ed. Durchblicke: Martin Heidegger zum 80 Geburstag. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Rohs, Peter. 1974. ‘Das Problem der vermittelten Unmittelbarkeit in der Hegelschen Logik,’ Philosophisches Jahrbuch 81.
Rosen, M. (1982), Hegel's Dialectics and Its Criticisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, R.M. (2005), Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winfield, R. D. (2006), From Concept to Objectivity: Thinking Through Hegel's Subjective Logic. London: Ashgate Publishing.
Winfield, R. D. (2009), ‘The End of Logic’, paper presented at the Society for Systematic Philosophy, held at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Hegel Bulletin
  • ISSN: 2051-5367
  • EISSN: 2051-5375
  • URL: /core/journals/hegel-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.