Skip to main content
×
×
Home

British Labour, Marxism and Working Class Apathy in the Nineteen Twenties

  • Stuart Macintyre (a1)
Extract

A problem of crucial importance confronted the British labour movement in the 1920s. The working class - those who earned their livelihood by selling their labour power, as well as their dependents - constituted a majority of the population. To the left it seemed manifest that their interests lay in ending a social system which exploited them and putting socialism in its place. Yet during the decade only a minority of British voters committed themselves to socialism, even at the minimal level of voting for the Labour party. As Philip Snowden lamented, ‘the very people for whom [the socialist] works and sacrifices are often indifferent and seldom show any gratitude’. Why did the British working class lack class consciousness?

Copyright
References
Hide All

1 The faith of a democrat (London, 1928), p. 3.

2 MacDonald, Ramsay, A policy for the Labour party (London, 1920), p. 181.

3 Snowden, , Twenty objections to socialism (London, 1920), p. 16.

4 MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution (Manchester, 1919), p. 103; A policy for the Labour party, p. 183.

5 Burns, Emue, Capitalism, Communism and the transition (London, 1933), p. 81.

6 Griffiths, Dan, The real enemy and other socialist essays (London, 1923), pp. 19, 21.

7 Paul, William, Communism and society (London, 1992), p. 79.

8 Pankhurst, Sylvia, ‘A reply to Philip Snowden’, Workers' Dreadnought, 6 Mar. 1920.

9 Millar, J. P. M., ‘Ten minutes talks with new students’, Plebs, xii (1920), p. 195.

10 Bukharin, and Preobrazhensky, , The ABC of Communism (London, 1922), p. 44.

11 Angell, Norman, ‘Capturing the workers' will’, New Leader, 9 Nov. 1923.

12 Bell, Thomas, Editorial, Communist Review, Iv (1924), 507; Dutt, , Marxism after fifty yean (London, 1933), p. 9.

13 Paul, William, The State: Its origin and functions (Glasgow, 1917), p. 187.

14 Hayward, C. H. and Langdon-Davies, B. N., Democracy and the press (Manchester, 1919), p. 4.

15 Editorial, Daily Herald, 31 Oct. 1924; Ibid. 27, 28, 31 Oct. 1924.

16 Notes of the Month’, Labour Monthly, vi (1924), p. 714.

17 Advertisement for the Herald in Labour Magazine, v (Aug. 1926); MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution, p. 27.

18 MacDonald, , Daily Herald, 25 Oct. 1924.

19 Paul, William, ‘Race riots and revolution’, Socialist, 10 July 1919.

20 Broadcasting babble machine’, Labour Monthly, XIII (1931), 191.

21 Workers' Weekly, 26 Dec. 1924.

22 See especially Martin's, The British public and the General Strike (London, 1931).

23 Paul, William, ‘Capitalism, labour and the press’, Labour Monthly, VII (1925), 565.

24 Pallister, Minnie, ‘Labour women confer’, New Leader, 5 June 1925.

25 ‘Workers' Sport’, Communist, III (1928), 461

26 ‘The press’, in Lees-Smith, H. B., Encyclopaedia of the Labour movement (London, 1928) III, 60.

27 Parliament and revolution, p. 65; and reported at the 1921 Conference of the I.L.P. in Labour Leader, 31 Mar. 1921.

28 Laski, Harold, Socialism and freedom (London, 1925), p. 5.

29 Socialism: Critical and constructive (London, 1921), p. 234.

30 Snowden, , Labour and the new world (London, 1921), p. 51.

31 Hayward, and Langdon-Davies, , Democracy and the press, pp. 5960.

32 The tradition is discussed with respect to MacDonald by Barker, Bernard in his introduction to Ramsay MacDonald'spolitical writings (London, 1972), and by Barker, Rodney, Education and politics 1900–1951. A study of the Labour party (Oxford, 1972), ch. I.

33Socialism and human nature’, Socialist Review, xxrv (1924), p. 182.

34 MacDonald, , Socialism: Critical and constructive, p. 283.

35 Lansbury's, George address from the chair, Labour Party Conference Report 1928, p. 150.

36 MacDonald, , Socialism: Critical and constructive, p. 2; Parliament and revolution, p. 8.

37 MacDonald's, address from the chair, Labour Party Conference Report 1924, p. 110.

38 A policy for the Labour party, p. 67.

39 ‘The Socialist Way’, Forward, 10 Sept. 1917.

40The Review outlook’, Socialist Review, xvi (1919), 208.

41 MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution, p. 6.

42 Allen, Clifford, ‘A victory that leads to victory’, New Leader, 7 Nov. 1924; Neft, R. in Griffiths, Dan (ed.), What is socialism? A symposium (London, 1924), p. 57.

43 Ponsonby, Arthur, ‘Democracy and the mob’, Socialist Review XXII (1923), 60.

44 Forward, 21 Dec. 1918.

45 MacDonald, , ‘The Review outlook’, Socialist Review, XVII (1920), 9.

46 My three revolutions (London, 1969), p. 247.

47 Forward, 8 Nov. 1924; Egan, Michael, ‘Arace for safety’, Socialist Review, XXIV (1924), 171.

48 Allen, Clifford, Socialism and the next Labour government (London, 1924), p. 6.

49 Scurr, John, ‘The dictatorship of the proletariat’, Labour Leader, 29 Jan. 1920; Griffiths, Dan, The real enemy, pp. 1213.

50 Bevin, Ernest, ‘Straight on through the wilderness’, Labour Magazine, x (1931), 347; Lansbury, George, preface to Gerald Gould, The coming revolution in Great Britain (London, 1920), p. ix.

51 Welsh, J. C., The king and the miner. A contrast (London, 1925), p. 6.

52 Dodd, James J., If Labour wins (London, 1922), p. 77.

53 MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution, p. 103.

54 Allen, Clifford, Putting socialism into practice (London, 1924), pp. 1617.

55 Wallas, Graham, Human nature in politics (London, 1908), p. 45.

56 Eden, and Paul, Cedar, Labour Leader, 17 Jan. 1918.

57 This term was derived from Tressel's, Robert book, The ragged trousered philanthropists (London, 1914), and also became common currency.

58 Shaw, , ‘Are we Bolshevists?’, Labour Leader, 24 Apr. 1919; Tawney, , ‘Christianity and the social revolution’, The Attack and other papers (London, 1935), p. 163; Tillett, , Daily Herald, 31 Oct. 1924.

59 The Attack, p. 163. Ross Terrill explores Tawney's use of Dubb, Henry in R. H. Taximey and his times. Socialism as fellowship (London, 1973), pp. 178, 195–6.

60 Gascoyne, James in, ‘The coming crash’, Communist, 12 Aug. 1930.

61 Eden, and Paul, Cedar, ‘Socialist education’, Workers' Dreadnought, 10 Aug. 1918.

62 Motler, L. A., ‘Dubb dialogues’, Workers' Dreadnought, 16, 23 Aug. 1919.

63 Jackson, T. A., review of Ragged trousered philanthropist, Sunday Worker, 18 Sept. 1927.

64 Socialist, 24 Dec. 1919.

65 (London, 1892), pp. xvii–xviii.

66 (London, 1926), ch. VIII; ‘Imperialism and t he split in t he Labour movement’ (1916), Lenin on Britain (London, 1934), p. 142. Collected works, vols. XXII, XXIII, no. See Hobsbawm's, E. J. discussion of the theory in Revolutionaries. Contemporary essays (London, 1973), PP. 121–9.

67 Rothstein, Theodore, From Chartism to Labourism. Historical sketches of the English working class movement (London, 1973), p. 266.

68 Shields, J., ‘The struggle of the Indian masses’, Communist Review, new ser., iv (1932).76.

69 Dutt, J.R. Palme, Modern India (London, 1927), p. 172; Fox, Ralph, ‘A Communist replies to Philips Price’, Socialist Review, new ser., VIII (Sept. 1926), 41.

70 Esp. pp. 255–66.

71Self-study syllabus’, Communist, II (1927), 284.

72 Leckie, Jack, ‘Draft programme of the C.P.G.B. to the Comintern criticised’, Communist Review, v (1924), 185.

73 Incorrigible rebel (London, 1960), p110.

74 ‘The concept of the Labour aristocracy’, Popular politics and society in late Victorian Britain (London, 1968), p. 61. For a contrary view see Hobsbawm, E. J., ‘The Labouraristocracy in late Victorian Britain’, Labouring men: Studies in the history of Labour (London, 1964), pp. 272315.

75 The I.L.P. and the Third International (London, 1920), p. 17.

75 Price, M. Philips, ‘Impressions of the General Election’, Communist International, XXIV (1923), 37; see also Burns, Emile, Communism and the transition (London, 1933), p. 91.

77 Barton, Alfred, A world history for the zuorkers (London, 1922), p. 95.

78 Brailsford, , Socialism for to-day (London, 1925), p. 51.

79 ‘The principle of empire’, Olives of endless age (New York, 1928), p. 283.

80 Labour Party Conference Report 1921, p. 208.

81 Haden-Guest, L., The Labour party and the empire (London, 1926), p. 7. For discussion of this group see Gupta, Partha Sarathi, Imperialism and the British Labour movement 1914–1964 (London, 1975).

82 Quelch, Tom, ‘The opposition to the social revolution in Britain’, Communist International, III, 1617 (1922) 99100.

83 Dutt, R. Palme, ‘Notes of the month’, Labour Monthly, VI (1924), 528–3.

84 Dowbrett, , ‘Immediate demands’, Communist Review, v (1924), 255.

85 ‘Marxism’, Socialist, 6 Jan. 1921.

86 The I.L.P.: a Marxist study’, Socialist Review, XVII (1920), 86.

87 Editorial, Communist Review, v (1924), 313.

88 A Query and an answer’, Communist Review, VII (1926), 339.

89 Bernard, A., ‘Marxist-Leninist education’, Communist Review, VII (1926), 378.

90 Labour Monthly, VIII (1926), 323–36.

91 Twenty objections to socialism, p. 16.

92 The aims of Labour (London, 1918), pp. 910.

93 When Labour rules (London, 1920), p. 8.

94 Labour Party Conference Report 1923, pp. 178–9.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 291 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.