Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • JOEL ISAAC (a1)

The last fifteen years have witnessed an explosion of interest in the history of the Cold War. Historical attention has focused not only on the diplomatic and military aspects of the conflict, but also, increasingly, on its cultural, intellectual, and technological dimensions. One of the fruits of this widening of scope in Cold War studies is a burgeoning literature on the development of the post-Second World War American human sciences. Studies of the Cold War career of the human sciences, however, have often been inflected by moralistic, and sometimes tendentious, claims about the relationship between the state and the academy. This article seeks to explain the chief characteristics of the historiography of the human sciences in Cold War America by describing its formation in the interstices of three distinct lines of inquiry: the history of science, the cultural turn in Cold War studies, and the history of the birth of the human science professions in the United States. It argues that historians of the post-war American human sciences have absorbed some features of these literatures, whilst neglecting others that offer more nuanced perspectives on the relationship between scientific research and its patrons during the Cold War era. Moreover, it suggests that the best prospects for the future maturation of the field lie in the recovery of ‘middle-range contextualizations’ that link post-war trends in the human sciences to interwar and turn-of-the-century developments, thereby making the Cold War context less all-encompassing than it has sometimes appeared.

Corresponding author
Queen Mary, University of LondonE1
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

David C. Engerman , ‘The romance of economic development and new histories of the Cold War’, Diplomatic History, 28 (2004), pp. 2354

Odd Arne Westad , ‘The new international history of the Cold War: three (possible) paradigms’, Diplomatic History, 24 (2000), pp. 551

Paul Forman , ‘Behind quantum electronics: national security as a basis for physical research in the United States, 1940–1960’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 18 (1987), pp. 149229

Robert Kargon and Stuart Leslie , ‘Imagined geographies: Princeton, Stanford and the boundaries of useful knowledge in postwar America’, Minerva, 32 (1994), pp. 121

Rebecca S. Lowen , ‘The more things change … : money, power and the professoriate’, History of Education Quarterly, 45 (2005), pp. 438–45

David Kaiser , ‘Cold War requisitions, scientific manpower, and the production of American physicists after World War II’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 33 (2002), pp. 131–59

David Hounshell , ‘The Cold War, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946–1962’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 27 (1997), pp. 237–67

Mark Solovey , ‘Introduction: science and the state during the Cold War: blurred boundaries and a contested legacy’, Social Studies of Science, 31 (2001), pp. 165–70, at p. 168.

Lawrence Badash , ‘Science and McCarthyism’, Minerva, 38 (2000), pp. 5380

David Kaiser , ‘The atomic secret in Red hands? American suspicions of theoretical physicists during the early Cold War’, Representations, 90 (2005), pp. 2860

David K. van Keuren , ‘Cold War science in black and white: US intelligence gathering and its scientific cover at the Naval Research Laboratory, 1948–62’, Social Studies of Science, 31 (2001), pp. 207–29

John Cloud , ‘Imagining the world in a barrel: CORONA and the clandestine convergence of the earth sciences’, Social Studies of Science, 31 (2001), pp. 231–51

Robert Griffith , ‘The cultural turn in Cold War studies’, Reviews in American History, 29 (2001), pp. 150–7

Stephen Tuck , ‘The new American histories’, Historical Journal, 48 (2005), pp. 811–32, at pp. 821–4

Frank Costigliola , ‘“Unceasing pressure for penetration”: gender, pathology, and emotion in George Kennan's formation of the Cold War’, Journal of American History, 83 (1997), pp. 1309–39

idem, ‘The nuclear family: tropes of gender and pathology in the Western alliance’, Diplomatic History, 21 (1997), pp. 163–83

Emily Rosenberg , ‘Foreign affairs after World War II: connecting sexual and international politics’, Diplomatic History, 18 (1994), pp. 5970

Brenda Gayle Plummer , ‘The changing face of diplomatic history: a literature review’, History Teacher, 38 (2005), pp. 385400

Michael J. Hogan , ‘The “next big thing”: the future of diplomatic history in a global age’, Diplomatic History, 28 (2004), pp. 121, at p. 2

Andrew Rotter , ‘Gender relations, foreign relations: the United States and South Asia, 1947–1964’, Journal of American History, 81 (1994), pp. 518–42, at p. 521

Michael L. Krenn , ‘“Unfinished business”: segregation and U.S. diplomacy at the 1958 World's Fair’, Diplomatic History, 20 (1996), pp. 591612

Jessica C. E. Gienow-Hecht , ‘Shame on US? academic, cultural transfer, and the Cold War – a critical review’, Diplomatic History, 24 (2000), pp. 465–94

Carl Kaysen , ‘Can universities cooperate with the defense establishment?’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 502 (1989), pp. 2939

Richard D. Lambert , ‘DoD, social science, and international studies’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 502 (1989), pp. 94107

David H. Price , ‘Subtle means and enticing carrots: the impact of funding on American Cold War anthropology’, Critique of Anthropology, 23 (2003), pp. 373401

Carleton Mabee , ‘Margaret Mead and behavioral scientists in World War II: problems in responsibility, truth, and effectiveness’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 23 (1987), pp. 313

Mark Solovey , ‘Riding natural scientists’ coattails onto the endless frontier: the SSRC and the quest for scientific legitimacy’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40 (2004), pp. 393422

K. J. Holsti , ‘Scholarship in an era of anxiety: the study of international politics during the Cold War’, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), pp. 1746

Winton U. Solberg and Robert W. Tomilson , ‘Academic McCarthyism and Keynesian economics: the Bowen controversy at the University of Illinois’, History of Political Economy, 29 (1997), pp. 5581

Nicholas Wisseman , ‘Falsely accused: Cold War liberalism reassessed’, Historian, 66 (2004), pp. 320–34

Solovey, ‘Project Camelot and the 1960s epistemological revolution: rethinking the politics–patronage–social science nexus’, Social Studies of Science, 31 (2001), pp. 171206

Bruce Kuklick , ‘Modern anglophone philosophy: between the seminar room and The Cold War’, Modern Intellectual History, 3 (2006), pp. 547–57

Joel Isaac , ‘W. V. Quine and the origins of analytic philosophy in the United States’, Modern Intellectual History, 2 (2005), pp. 205–34

Michael E. Latham , ‘Ideology, social science, and destiny: modernization and the Kennedy-era Alliance for Progress’, Diplomatic History, 22 (1998), pp. 199229

Nick Cullather , ‘Development? It's history’, Diplomatic History, 24 (2000), pp. 641–53

Nick Cullather , ‘Miracles of modernization: the green revolution and the apotheosis of technology’, Diplomatic History, 28 (2004), pp. 227–54

David C. Engerman , ‘New society, new scholarship: Soviet studies in interwar America’, Minerva, 37 (1999), pp. 2543

David C. Engerman , ‘Rethinking Cold War universities: some recent histories’, Journal of Cold War Studies, 5 (2003), pp. 8095

Thomas Haskell , ‘Modernization on trial’, Modern Intellectual History, 2 (2005), pp. 243–4

Reynolds, ‘1940: fulcrum of the twentieth century?International Affairs, 66 (1990), pp. 325–50

Charles Camic , ‘The making of a method: a historical reinterpretation of the early Parsons’, American Sociological Review, 52 (1987), pp. 421–39

idem, ‘Reputation and predecessor selection: Parsons and the institutionalists’, American Sociological Review 57 (1992), pp. 421–45

idem, ‘The Parsons revival in German sociology’, Sociological Theory, 2 (1984), pp. 394412

Sarah Igo , ‘“A gold mine and a tool for democracy”: George Gallup, Elmo Roper, and the business of scientific polling’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 42 (2006), pp. 109–34

Jamie Cohen-Cole , ‘The reflexivity of cognitive science: the scientist as model of human nature’, History of the Human Sciences, 18 (2005), pp. 107–39

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *