Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Green, Alix 2015. History as Expertise and the Influence of Political Culture on Advice for Policy Since Fulton. Contemporary British History, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 27.


    PEDEN, G. C. 2012. SUEZ AND BRITAIN'S DECLINE AS A WORLD POWER. The Historical Journal, Vol. 55, Issue. 04, p. 1073.


    Rodden, John and Rossi, John P. 2010. If He Had Lived, or A Counterfactual Life of George Orwell. Prose Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Baker, Andrew 2009. Divided sovereignty: Empire and nation in the making of modern Britain. International Politics, Vol. 46, Issue. S6, p. 691.


    ×

THE LESSONS OF ABADAN AND SUEZ FOR BRITISH FOREIGN POLICYMAKERS IN THE 1960s

  • PETER J. BECK (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X06005310
  • Published online: 01 June 2006
Abstract

Responding positively to the 1957 ‘funding experience’ initiative encouraging Whitehall departments to use history more systematically in their everyday work, the Foreign Office commissioned a pilot project centred upon the 1951 Anglo-Iranian Abadan crisis. The resulting study, completed by Rohan Butler in 1962, included a lengthy section drawing lessons from the historical narrative. During the early 1960s Butler's Abadan history, attracting interest and comment from both ministers and officials, fed into ongoing reviews of British foreign policy and methods stimulated by the 1956 Suez debacle and Britain's initial failure to join the Common Market (1963). Confronting policymakers with the contemporary realities affecting Britain's role in the world, the history prompted serious thinking about the case for a radical change of direction in both foreign policy and methods. Generally speaking, the Foreign Office has made little use of history in the actual policymaking process. From this perspective, this episode, centred upon Butler's Abadan history, offers a useful case study illuminating any appraisal of history's potential as a policy input, most notably concerning the role of historical analogies in the formulation, conduct, and presentation of British foreign policy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EE P.Beck@kingston.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All
This article, based upon the keynote lecture delivered to BISA's British International History Group Conference held at the University of East Anglia in September 2004, has benefited from the assistance and constructive advice of Gillian Bennett, John Dickie, Christopher Hill, Wm. Roger Louis, Steve Marsh, Zara Steiner, D. R. Thorpe, and Chris Wrigley as well as the anonymous referees. This study is derived from a research project supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×