Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Klepac, Petra Megiddo, Itamar Grenfell, Bryan T. and Laxminarayan, Ramanan 2016. Self-enforcing regional vaccination agreements. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Vol. 13, Issue. 114, p. 20150907.

    Nunes, João 2016. Ebola and the production of neglect in global health. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 542.

    González-Santos, Sandra and Dimond, Rebecca 2015. Medical and Scientific Conferences as Sites of Sociological Interest: A Review of the Field. Sociology Compass, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 235.

    Carmichael, A.G. 2014. Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences.

    Radin, Joanna 2014. Unfolding epidemiological stories: How the WHO made frozen blood into a flexible resource for the future. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 47, p. 62.

    Shafir, Nir 2014. The international congress as scientific and diplomatic technology: global intellectual exchange in the International Prison Congress, 1860–90. Journal of Global History, Vol. 9, Issue. 01, p. 72.

    Kim, Jeong-Ran 2013. The Borderline of ‘Empire’: Japanese Maritime Quarantine in Busan c.1876–1910. Medical History, Vol. 57, Issue. 02, p. 226.

    Tognotti, Eugenia 2013. Lessons from the History of Quarantine, from Plague to Influenza A. Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 254.

    Hamlin, Christopher 2012. The Cholera Stigma and the Challenge of Interdisciplinary Epistemology: From Bengal to Haiti. Science as Culture, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 445.

    Brown, Tim 2011. ‘Vulnerability is universal’: Considering the place of ‘security’ and ‘vulnerability’ within contemporary global health discourse. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 72, Issue. 3, p. 319.

    Chiffoleau, Sylvia 2011. Les pèlerins de La Mecque, les germes et la communauté internationale. médecine/sciences, Vol. 27, Issue. 12, p. 1121.

    Kates, Jennifer and Katz, Rebecca 2011. The Role of Treaties, Agreements, Conventions, and Other International Instruments in Global Health. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 455.

    KNAB, CORNELIA 2011. Infectious Rats and Dangerous Cows: Transnational Perspectives on Animal Diseases in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. Contemporary European History, Vol. 20, Issue. 03, p. 281.

    Brown, Michael 2010. “Like a Devoted Army”: Medicine, Heroic Masculinity, and the Military Paradigm in Victorian Britain. The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 03, p. 592.

    Budd, Lucy Morag Bell, and Brown, Tim 2009. Of plagues, planes and politics: Controlling the global spread of infectious diseases by air. Political Geography, Vol. 28, Issue. 7, p. 426.

    Carmichael, A.G. 2009. Encyclopedia of Microbiology.

    Chahrour, Marcel 2007. ‘A civilizing mission’? Austrian medicine and the reform of medical structures in the Ottoman Empire, 1838–1850. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 687.



  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2006

This article analyses the proceedings of eight International Sanitary Conferences which were convened between 1851 and 1894 to address the danger that cholera epidemics posed to Europe. These conferences are examined in the context of the intellectual and institutional changes in scientific medicine and in the light of the changing structure of internationalist endeavours that took place in the second half of the nineteenth century. The article shows that the International Sanitary Conferences were as much spaces of co-operation as they were arenas where differences and boundaries between disciplines, nations, and cultures were defined. Furthermore, it seeks to shed light on a broader tension of the period. On the one hand, the fact that the world was growing together to an unprecedented extent due to new means of transportation enabled Europeans to establish and expand profitable commercial and colonial relations. On the other hand, this development increased the vulnerability of Europe – for example to the importation of diseases. The perception that the world was becoming increasingly interconnected was thus coupled with the need for controllable boundaries. The conferences attempted to find solutions as to how borders could be secured without resorting to traditional barriers; like semipermeable membranes they should be open for some kinds of communication but closed for others.

Corresponding author
Beerenstr. 47a, 14163 Berlin,
Hide All
This article is based on my M.Phil. dissertation (University of Cambridge, June 2004). I wish to thank Richard Evans for his supervision, Ludmilla Jordanova for her encouragement, and an anonymous referee for this journal for helpful suggestions guiding the transformation from dissertation into article.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *